branches, one destined to the deltoid m., but the other carrying an important blood supply to the bone. The distribution of
the areas stained by the ACA and the PCA showed the important role of both of these. The vascular effects of an injury
of the upper humeral epiphysis may be caused by a direct injury of the trunks of the arteries, by destruction of the
subperiosteal vessels, by interruption of the intraosseous vessels, or by simultaneous lesions of two or three of these
mechanisms together. In the cases of fractures with a major displacement, or with dislocations, all three mechanisms of
blood supply interruption may be involved.
The injections of the suprascapular a. never colored the humeral head, but after an injury the anastomosis may be thought
to be most developed and efficient. The insertions of the tendons carry some arterial vessels that penetrate into the bone,
but the possibilities of substitutionare only hypothetical [11, 12]. The subperiosteal vessels may be injured by a fracture,
even if undisplaced. The persistent patency of a subperiosteal vessel in relation to the fracture is also a hypothesis, that is
not sustained by the necrosis that may be occasionally observed after some undisplaced or slightly displaced fractures [4,
14].
The effects of a fracture concern the intraosseous vessels. Any fracture of the anatomic neck will separate the head from
its arterial blood supply, because it will remove the center of the head and the epiphyseal plate from the humerus. The
interruption of the blood supply is unavoidable in this case, and the head survey will only be possible if some parts of the
capsule remain attached to a fragment of the neck separated with the head [1, 6, 10 , 13 , 14 ], or if some tendinous
insertions remain present on a fragment of tuberosity separated with the head. Later, a restored vascularization may be
expected, because of local neo-angiogenesis in the fracture-healing zone. Thus, the conditions of survey of the humeral
head need a sufficient blood supply during this healing period. The rate of necrosis seems less high in the cases of
impacted valgus fractures, when the displacement is slight, without shearing between the metaphysis and the epiphysis,
completing the previous observations of Jakob [7].
The intraosseous vessels have the same arrangement as the trabecular bone, and the different supplies to the head or the
tubercles may be separated. The decreased density of the bone with age creates a zone of weak resistance between the
tubercles, as seen on the radiographs when the trabecular system is altered, the narrow cortex of the diaphysis, and the
dense bone of the epiphyseal plate and of the center of the head [5]. These structures may be much more easily separated
in the elderly, and this will cause interruption of the blood supply to the head. The remodeling activity of the bone and
the number of vessels in the subchondral bone will decrease from 30% between the teenage and the sixth decade, and is
slightly re -increased later [8], so that the risk of avascular necrosis of the periphery of the head appears greater with age
because of the poor remaining blood supply.
Conclusion
Both the ACA and PCA participate in the vascularization of the upper humeral epiphysis. The interruption of the blood
supply to the humeral head probably occurs at the time of the injury (fracture or dislocation or combined fracture -
dislocation), or during secondary displacement of the fragments in reduction. These data may help in the therapeutic
decision between a conservative treatment that must avoid increasing the vascular injuries or a prosthetic arthroplasty,
with a close relation to the type of bone injury and the age of the patient.
References
1. Brook CH, Reveli WJ, Heatley FW (1993) Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures. J Bone
Joint Surg 75 132-136
2. Fischer L, Carret JP, Gillet JP, Morin A, Bouchet A (1974) Vascularisation art érielle de l'humérus chez l'homme. Bull
Assoc Anat 163 859 -866
3. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Winh TS (1990) The arterial vascularization of the humeral head. An anatomical study. J
Bone Joint Surg72 1486-1494
4. Gremigni D, de Faveri Tron M, Todescan G (1975) La vascolarizzazionne arteriosa dell' omero umano, Arch It Anat e
Embriol 80 163-172
5. Hall MC, Rosser M (1963) The structure of the upper end of the humerus with reference to osteoporotic changes in
senescence leading to fractures. Canad Med Ass J 88 290-294
6. Hawkins RJ, Angelo RL (1987) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Orth Clin N Am 18 421-431
7. Jakob PJ, Miniaci A, Anson PS, Jaberg H, Osterwalder A, Ganz R (1991) Four part valgus impacted fractures of the
proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B 295-298