B.J. Levandowski, N.S. Abularrage and R.T. Raines
Tetrahedron 91 (2021) 132160
Table 1
Measuresa of the aromaticity of cyclopentadiene and 5,5-dimethylcyclopentadiene
[
6,8].
NICS(0)
L
ASE
BI
ꢁ3.1
ꢁ3.5
2.60
29
ꢁ2.2
ꢁ2.4
0.85
22
a
NICS(0), nuclear independent chemical shift; L, diamagnetic susceptibility
exaltation; ASE, aromatic stabilization energy (kcal/mol); BI, Bird Index.
Scheme 2. Second-order rate constants for the DielseAlder reactions of Me
Me Cp, and Me Cp with maleimide.
4
Cp,
5
6
M06e2X/6-31þG(d) level of theory in Gaussian16 Rev. C.01 [24,25].
The ground state structures of cyclopentadiene, 5,5-
dimethylcyclopentadiene, 2,3-diazacyclopentadiene, and 5,5-
dimethyl-2,3-diazacyclopentadiene are shown in Fig. 1. The angle
between the geminal substituents is represented by
q
2
. Geminal
ꢀ
ꢀ
dimethylation increases
q
2
from 106.4 in cyclopentadiene to 110.1
ꢀ
in 5,5-dimethylcyclopentadiene and from 107.6
in 2,3-
Scheme 1.
p
-Facial selectivity in the DielseAlder reaction of 5-methylcyclopentadiene
diazacyclopentadiene
to
111.2
ꢀ
in
5,5-dimethyl-2,3-
with 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-dione [18].
diazacyclopentadiene. The increase in
2
q results in a decrease in
the angle between the ring substituents of C5, which is represented
ꢀ
by
1
q
1
. Specifically,
q
1
decreases from 103.2 in cyclopentadiene to
(
4,4-dimethyl-4H-pyrazoles) react poorly as DielseAlder dienes.
ꢀ
ꢀ
01.8 in 5,5-dimethylcyclopentadiene, and from 97.5 in 2,3-
Even with highly reactive strained dienophiles, DielseAlder re-
actions of 5,5-dimethyl-2,3-diazacyclopentadienes do not readily
proceed unless promoted with an acid catalyst [4,19e22]. To un-
derstand the poor DielseAlder reactivities of geminally substituted
ꢀ
diazacyclopentadiene
diazacyclopentadiene. The decrease in
to
96.3
in
5,5-dimethyl-2,3-
q
1
decreases the distance
between the diene termini of cyclopentadiene and 2,3-
diazacyclopentadiene, which is represented by r, by 0.02 and
.01 Å, respectively. These structural changes upon geminal
dimethylation are consistent with the ThorpeeIngold effect
26e28].
The transition state structures and Gibbs free energies of acti-
5
,5-dimethylcyclopentadienes
and
5,5-dimethyl-2,3-
0
diazacyclopentadienes, we have computationally and experimen-
tally studied the effect of the gem-dimethyl substitution on reac-
tivity. Our results provide new insight on the basis for the sluggish
reactivity of these dienes.
[
z
vation (DG ) for the DielseAlder reactions of cyclopentadiene (TS-
1
), 5,5-dimethylcyclopentadiene (TS-2), 2,3-diazacyclopentadiene
2
. Results and discussion
(TS-3), and 5,5-dimethyl-2,3-diazacyclopentadiene (TS-4) with
ethylene are shown in Fig. 2. Geminal dimethylation decreases the
To quantify the effect of geminal dimethylation on DielseAlder
DielseAlder
reactivity
of
cyclopentadiene
and
2,3-
reactivity, we experimentally determined the second-order rate
diazacyclopentadiene by 310- and 35-fold, respectively [29].
Geminal dimethylation has little influence on the reaction energies.
To understand the origin of the decreased reactivity upon the
geminal dimethylation of the cyclopentadiene and 2,3-
diazacyclopentadiene scaffolds, we analyzed the DielseAlder re-
actions of cyclopentadiene, 5,5-dimethylcyclopentadiene, 2,3-
diazacyclopentadiene, and 5,5-dimethyl-2,3-diazacyclopentadiene
with the distortion/interactioneactivation strain model [30]. This
model dissects the electronic energies into the distortion energies
and interaction energies. The distortion energies represent the
energy required to deform the ground state structures of the re-
actants into the geometries of the transition state. The interaction
energies are the energies of interactions that occur between the
diene and dienophile during the course of bond formation. These
interactions include steric (i.e., Pauli-repulsion), orbital, electro-
static, and dispersive interactions. The transition states of the gem-
dimethyl substituted dienes occur later than those of the unsub-
stituted dienes. To account for the different timing of the transition
constants
for
the
DielseAlder
reactions
(Me Cp),
Cp),
of
1,2,3,4-
1,2,3,4,5-
tetramethylcyclopentadiene
pentamethylcyclopentadiene
hexamethylcyclopentadiene (Me
4
(Me
5
and
1,2,3,4,5,5-
6
Cp) with maleimide. Second-
order reaction kinetics were assessed with UVevis spectroscopy
for Me Cp and Me Cp. NMR spectroscopy was used for Me Cp
4
5
6
because the reaction was too slow to observe the reaction rates
otherwise. We note that an experimental comparison between the
DielseAlder reactivity of a 5,5-dimethyl-2,3-diazacyclopentadiene
and a 2,3-diazacyclopentadiene without substituents at the satu-
rated center is not possible because unsubstituted 2,3-
diazacyclopentadienes rapidly isomerize into 1H-pyrazoles [23].
The experimental second-order rate constants for the DielseAlder
reactions of Me
dienophile are 124, 85, and 0.13 M
4 5 6
Cp, Me Cp, and Me Cp with maleimide as the
ꢁ
1 ꢁ1
s
, respectively (Scheme 2).
Thus, the presence of a gem-dimethyl group on the saturated center
reduces the DielseAlder reactivity of the diene by approximately 3
orders of magnitude.
state
structures,
we
performed
the
distortion/inter-
To understand the origin of the decreased DielseAlder reactivity
actioneactivation strain analysis along the intrinsic reaction coor-
dinate (IRC) defined by the average length of the forming bonds
[31]. The results from the analysis are shown in Fig. 3. The distor-
tion/interactioneactivation strain analysis indicates that the
in
5,5-dimethylcyclopentadienes
and
5,5-dimethyl-2,3-
diazacyclopentadienes, we studied computationally the reactions
of these dienes and their unsubstituted counterparts with ethylene.
Calculations were performed at the M06e2X/6e311þþG(d,p)//
2