230
PONOMAREV et al.
0
.2 g (0.001 mol) of CuI and 0.5 mL of triethylamine. over methylhydroquinone) in 5 mL was added dropꢀ
The reaction course was monitored by TLC using tolꢀ wise, and stirring was continued (24, 48, 72, and 96 h)
uene–methanol as an eluent. After reactants and with intermittent sonication for 20–30 min at 40–
2
3
1
disappeared, the reaction solution was filtered through 50°C and sampling for H NMR analysis of the substiꢀ
a thin layer of silica gel, concentrated to 5–6 mL, and tution extent. The polymer was precipitated with
allowed to crystallize in a refrigerator to give pale yelꢀ water, acidified with acetic acid to pH 5, filtered, and
low crystals, mp 114–116°C.
the polymer powder was refluxed twice in distilled
water for 1–2 h each to remove the solvent. The powꢀ
der was dried at 100°C in a vacuum. Depending on conꢀ
ditions and reactant ratio, the alkylation degree may be
For C H N O P anal. calcd. (%): C, 64.66; H,
.63; N, 13.96; P, 6.18, FW = 501.52.
27
28
5
3
5
Found (%): C, 64.51; H, 5.68; N, 13.76; P, 6.13.
25–100%. Propargylꢀcontaining PBI–O–PT–Pg is
1
H NMR (DMSOꢀd + CF COOD, δ, ppm, J, Hz):
6
3
readily soluble in amide solvents and DMSO.
1
2
.15 (t, 6H, СН3, 3JHH 6.8), 3.30 (d, 2H, СН Р, 2JHР
2
1.6), 3.95 (dq, 4H, СН О, 3J
3J
1,3ꢀDipolar addition of 4ꢀazidobenzylphosphonate (3)
to PBI–O–PT–Pg to form PTPBI. PBI–O–PT–Pg
~
7.1), 5.84
HP
2
HH
2
4
(
s, 2H, CH N), 7.46 (d, 2H, C H ,6, 3JHH 7.7), 7.58–
2
6
(
0.608 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 6 mL of DMSO, a
7
.67 (m, 2H, Н5'',6''), 7.71–7.84 (m, 5H,
mꢀ + pꢀС Н +
6 5
solution of 0.55 g (~2.2 mmol of azide in 5 mL of
3
C H ), 7.85–7.93 (m, 1H, Н4''), 8.05–8.16 (m, 3H, DMSO and a solution of 0.04 g of CuI, 0.5 mL of Et N
3
,5
6
4
3
in 3 mL of DMSO were added. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 8 h at 60–80°C, filtered through a fritꢀ
ted glass filter, and precipitated with 1% aqueous
ammonia solution. The precipitate was separated by
filtration, dried at 100°C in a vacuum, and studied by
NMR and IR spectroscopy and by elemental analysis.
In all cases, irrespective of the alkylation extent of
PBI–O–PT, the polymer analogous “click” reaction
о
ꢀС Н + Н7''), 8.94 (s, 1H, H5').
6 5
3
1
1
P{ H} NMR (DMSOꢀd ,
δ
, ppm): 26.00 s.
Alkylation of PBI–O–PT with propargyl bromide.
Alkylation (Scheme 3) was carried out using the samꢀ
ples of PBI–O–PT with = 1.4–3.0 dL/g (0.5%
solution in NꢀMP at 25
according to GPC data to Mw = 60000–90000 [3].
6
η
red
°
C), which corresponds
The polymer (0.532 g, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 6 mL proceeded quantitatively. Completely alkylated PBI–
of NꢀMP, 0.3 g (~2.2 mmol) of K CO was added, and O–PT undergoes 100% addition of azide to give
2
3
the mixture was stirred for 30 min on a water ultraꢀ PTPBI containing 5.2% of phosphorus at a calculated
sound bath at 40–50°C. Then, a solution of 0.5 g value of 5.18%. The polymer is soluble in amide solꢀ
(
~4.4 mmol) of propargyl bromide (freshly distilled vents, DMSO, and HCOOH.
1
5
10
Rh, nm
0
.010
.008
0
1
2
3
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
log
M
Fig. 2. Molecular weight distribution function relative to PS (lower axis) and hydrodynamic radius distribution (upper axis) for
) PBI–O–PT, ( ) PBI–O–PT–Pg (modification extent of 80%), and ( ) the corresponding PTPBI–O–PT. is the weight
fraction of polymer.
(1
2
3
W
DOKLADY CHEMISTRY Vol. 447
Part 1
2012