April 2004
523
esis induced by tumors, we established an assay system in Agents supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
which the compound inhibiting HUVEC growth induced by Priority Area “Cancer” from the Ministry of Education, Cul-
the conditioned medium of PC-9 could be screened. Though ture, Sports, Science and Technology.
the identified active compound 4Ј-thioguanosine inhibited the
growth induced by the conditioned medium of PC-9, it did REFERENCES
not inhibited the growth induced by the generally known an-
1
2
)
)
Folkman J., Adv. Cancer Res., 43, 175—203 (1985).
Ingber D., Fujita T., Kishimoto S., Sudo K., Kanamaru T., Brem H.,
Folkman J., Nature (London), 348, 555—557 (1990).
Fong T. A., Shawver L. K., Sun L., Tang C., App H., Powell T. J., Kim
Y. H., Schreck R., Wang X., Risau W., Ullrich A., Hirth K. P., McMa-
hon G., Cancer Res., 59, 99—106 (1999).
O’Reilly M. S., Holmgren L., Shing Y., Chen C., Rosenthal R. A.,
Moses M., Lane W. S., Cao Y., Sage E. H., Folkman J., Cell, 79, 315—
giogenesis-related growth factors, bFGF and VEGF (Fig. 1).
Thus, 4Ј-thioguanosine appears to inhibit different pathway
from bFGF or VEGF pathway, though the factor in PC-9
conditioned medium has not clarified yet. For example, an-
giogenin, known to have ribonucleolytic activity and promote
angiogenesis, is one of the possible target(s) of 4Ј-thioguano-
3
4
5
)
)
)
1
5)
sine. We consider that the inhibitory mechanism of 4Ј-
thioguanosine is different from that of 6-MMPR, the anti-an-
giogenic 4Ј-oxonucleoside, because it was reported to inhibit
3
28 (1994).
O’Reilly M. S., Boehm T., Shing Y., Fukai N., Vasios G., Lane W. S.,
Flynn E., Birkhead J. R., Olsen B. R., Folkman J., Cell, 88, 277—285
(1997).
Presta M., Rusnati M., Belleri M., Morbidelli L., Ziche M., Ribatti D.,
Cancer Res., 59, 2417—2424 (1999).
6
)
bFGF pathway.
6
7
)
)
The nucleosides containing a sulfur atom at the 4Ј-posi-
tion, where oxygen is in the case of natural nucleosides, were
Reist E. J., Gueffroy D. E., Goodman L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86,
1
6—19)
reported to have antitumor or antiviral activity.
How-
5
658—5663 (1964).
ever, they were shown or suggested to inhibit DNA synthesis
8) Anisuzzaman A. K. M., Amin M. D., J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci., 2,
2
0,21)
by inhibiting DNA polymerases.
4Ј-Thioguanosine is not
59—64 (1978).
9
)
Yoshimura Y., Endo M., Miura S., Sakata S., J. Org. Chem., 64,
suggested to act as a mere DNA or RNA synthesis inhibitor
3
3
7912—7920 (1999).
0) Mossman T., J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55—63 (1983).
1) Yamori T., Matsunaga A., Sato S., Yamazaki K., Komi A., Ishizu K.,
Mita I., Edatsugi H., Matsuba Y., Takezawa K., Nakanishi O., Kohno
H., Nakajima Y., Komatsu H., Andoh T., Tsuruo T., Cancer Res., 59,
because it did not inhibit [ H]thymidine or [ H]uridine incor-
poration into the macromolecular fraction of HUVEC unlike
araC (data not shown). The molecular target of 4Ј-thioguano-
sine remains to be clarified.
1
1
4
042—4049 (1999).
In the CAM assay, 4Ј-thioguanosine inhibited the S-180
growth (Fig. 2) though it did not inhibit physiological angio-
genesis in the experimental system in which tumor tissue was 13) Kusaka M., Sudo K., Fujita T., Marui S., Itoh F., Ingber D., Folkman J.,
1
2) Ohyama S., Tanaka M., Yonemura Y., Kinoshita K., Miyazaki I.,
Sasaki T., Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 82, 607—612 (1991).
not implanted onto CAM (data not shown). These results
also suggest that 4Ј-thioguanosine inhibits the tumor growth
by inhibiting the pathway that transmits the angiogenesis sig-
nal from certain unidentified growth factors produced by the
tumor. Unfortunately, 4Ј-thioguanosine exhibited a fatal side
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 174, 1070—1076 (1991).
4) Boshoff C., Endo Y., Collins P. D., Takeuchi Y., Reeves J. D., Schwe-
ickart V. L., Siani M. A., Sasaki T., Williams T. J., Gray P. W., Moore
P. S., Chang Y., Weiss R. A., Science, 278, 290—294 (1997).
5) Leland P. A., Staniszewski K. E., Park C., Kelemen B. R., Raines R.
T., Biochemistry, 41, 1343—1350 (2002).
1
1
effect suggesting its neurotoxicity when administered sys- 16) Yoshimura Y., Kitano K., Yamada K., Satoh H., Watanabe M., Miura
S., Sakata S., Sasaki T., Matsuda A., J. Org. Chem., 62, 3140—3152
temically to mice. The mechanism of the neurotoxicity, pos-
sibly unrelated to its anti-angiogenic action, is also uncertain.
The clarification of these mechanisms and the derivative with
(
1997).
1
7) Miura S., Yoshimura Y., Endo M., Machida H., Matsuda A., Tanaka
M., Sasaki T., Cancer Lett., 129, 103—110 (1998).
no neurotoxicity are needed for the further development of 18) Ashida N., Machida H., Recent Devel. Antiviral Res., 1, 63—73
useful drugs in clinical cancer chemotherapy.
(2001).
1
9) Tiwari K. N., Shortnacy-Fowler A. T., Cappellacci L., Parker W. B.,
Waud W. R., Montgomery J. A., Secrist J. A., 3rd, Nucleosides Nu-
cleotides Nucleic Acids, 19, 329—340 (2000).
0) Miura S., Yoshimura Y., Satoh H., Izuta S., Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 92,
562—567 (2001).
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. T. Abiru, Dr. S. Sakata
and Dr. K. Kodama of Yamasa Corporation for helpful dis-
cussions and for supporting this work. We also thank Dr. H.
Hayakawa of Yamasa Corporation for critical reading of this
manuscript. The test for human cancer cell line panel was
carried out at the Screening Committee of New Anticancer
2
2
1) Parker W. B., Shaddix S. C., Rose L. M., Waud W. R., Shewach D. S.,
Tiwari K. N., Secrist J. A., 3rd, Biochem. Pharmacol., 60, 1925—1932
(
2000).