2
86
H.J. Xie et al. / Electrochimica Acta 200 (2016) 283–289
for ionic conductivity. The values obtained are 684 K, 1199 K, 915 K,
and 1159 K for [C Im][FcNTf], [C Im][FcNTf], [C Im][FcNTf],
Im][FcNTf], respectively. An increase in the value of the B
C
1 2
C
2 2
1 4
C
4 4
[C C
parameter with increased alkyl chain length is observed for our
RILs (Table 2). Watanabe et al. published a systematic study of the
physicochemical properties of several imidazolium-NTf
2
ionic
liquids with different alkyl chain lengths [29]. They found B
parameter values from the VFT fitting ranging between 604 and
1 1 2 1 4 2
625 K for ILs with short chains ([C C Im][NTf ] to [C C Im][NTf ])
as well as increasing values for chains with more than four carbon
atoms. They also demonstrated that conductivity, diffusivity and
+
viscosity had the same structural dependency. The [C
1
C
1
Im] and
+
1 2
[C C Im] cations provided ILs with the same properties, and a
decrease in conductivity and diffusivity (along with increased
viscosity) was observed with alkyl chains having more than four
carbon atoms. This tendency appears to apply also to ionic liquids
modified with ferrocene. Fig. 3 shows a comparison of the
conductivity of three families of ionic liquids with different alkyl
chains: the unmodified [C
1
C
Y
Im][NTf
] where the cation bears the ferrocene, and
Im][FcNTf] with the redox anion. All three ionic liquids show
2
], the redox ionic liquids
Fig. 3. Ionic conductivity tendencies based on variations in alkyl side chain length
Y 2
[FcEC Im][NTf
for pure [C
X
C
Y
Im][FcNTf] and [FcEIMC
x
][NTf
2
]
[17] RILs and corresponding
ꢁ
[C
1
C
Y
uncommon ILs [47] at 60 C.
a very similar decrease in conductivity with a single alkyl chain
length increase.
the 1 mM solution, where all diffusion coefficient values are
located within the same range. This is likely caused by maximum
solvation of both species as the concentration of ionic liquid is
lower in solution. Therefore, in diluted solutions the cation size has
little impact on the transport properties of the anionic electro-
active species. In comparison with ferrocene, the [FcNTf] anions
diffuse less rapidly because of a significantly larger radius. Our
previous work showed that the diffusion coefficient of [FcNTf]
3.3. Diffusion in diluted solutions
The diffusion of RILs diluted in acetonitrile has been character-
ized at 0.3 M and 1 mM in the presence of 1 M TBAP as supporting
electrolyte, in order to assess the role of cation size in transport.
This would suggest that the strong interaction between RIL ions
would be maintained even at low concentrations. The CVs obtained
ꢀ5
2 ꢀ1
(DFcNTf = 1.03 ꢃ10 cm s ) was only half the value for ferrocene
ꢀ
5
2 ꢀ1
at various scan rates for [C
C
1 2
Im][FcNTf] at both concentrations are
(DFc = 1.99 ꢃ10 cm s ) in diluted solutions (1 mM in CH CN
3
presented in Fig. 4. The curves show a reversible electrochemical
system with a mid-point potential shifted to values higher than
that of ferrocene, due to the electron-withdrawing effect of the
with 0.1 M TBAP) [14]. The electrochemical parameters of RIL are
listed in Table 4 for 0.3 M and 1 mM solutions. As the redox active-
group is linked to anion structure, no obvious cation influence can
be reported for the 1 mM solutions. All mid-point potential (E’)
ꢀ
2 2 3
(SO )N(SO )CF group in FcNTf. A large peak splitting (DEp,a-p,c) is
observed for all scan rates at a concentration of 0.3 M (Fig. 4(A)),
which is caused by solution resistance. The diffusion coefficients
were calculated using the Randles-Sevcik equation [45]:
values, as well as
within the same range of values. The
D
E
pa-pc and oxidation and reduction limits, fall
pa-pc values obtained at
D
E
0.3 M are significantly larger than those in the 1 mM solutions due
to higher solution viscosity. The mid-point potentials (E’) for the
0.3 M solutions are also found to be slightly higher than those
obtained in the 1 mM solutions and some effect of the cation on the
E’ is noted. This is a result of a difference between the diffusion
coefficients of the oxidized (neutral) and reduced (anionic) species
which distorts the CV at high concentrations of RIL. This effect was
explained in a previous publication [14].
ꢀ
ꢁ
1
=2
nF
RT
v1=2D1=2
i
p
¼ 0:4463 n FAC
ð2Þ
where i
p
is the peak current (A), n the equivalent number of
electrons exchanged during the reaction, A the surface area of the
2
3
electrode (cm ), C the concentration (mol/cm ), D the diffusion
2
coefficient (cm /s), T the temperature (K),
V/s), and F and R the Faraday (C/mol) and ideal gas (J/mol
constants, respectively.
n
the potential scan rate
(
ꢂK)
3
.4. Electrochemistry
The CV curves and Randles-Sevcik plots obtained for all
solutions of RILs are shown in Figs. S3 to S6 and the diffusion
coefficient values are listed in Table 3. At high concentration
1 2
Due to its low viscosity in the pure state, the [C C Im][FcNTf]
RIL was selected for all remaining studies on the electrochemical
behavior of the redox anion. While the [C
provide slightly lower viscosity, its 90 C melting point complicates
the measurement process. Fig. 5(A) shows the cyclic voltammo-
1
C
1
Im][FcNTf] RIL may
(
0.3 M), an effect on chain length is noted in the [C
8 8
C Im][FcNTf]
ꢁ
and [C Im][FcNTf] ionic liquids. The impact of cation structure
1 8
C
on anion transport properties indicates a partial association
between cation and anion in the 0.3 M solution. However, the
ion association and impact of viscosity become less significant for
grams for pure [C
1
C
2
Im][FcNTf] at different temperatures between
0 C and 80 C. As discussed above, once melted, these RILs remain
in a super cooled liquid state for a substantial period of time,
allowing CV experiments to be made below T . The CV curves in
ꢁ
ꢁ
5
m
Table 2
Fig. 5(A) indicate that the transport properties are improved at
higher temperatures, as the liquid becomes less viscous. A
noticeable feature of these curves is the different shapes of the
oxidation and reduction peaks. The maximum peak current is
significantly higher during the oxidation process than during
reduction. This difference may be an effect of a migrational
contribution to mass transport which increases the flux of FcNTf
VFT fitting parameters of [C
X Y
C Im][FcNTf] in their undiluted state. The parameters
for the RILs with C
8
chains are not listed because of unreliable fitting.
ꢀ
1
RILs
B/K
T
0
/K
0
s /S m
C
1
C
2
C
1
C
4
C
C
C
C
2
Im FcNTf
2
Im FcNTf
4
Im FcNTf
4
Im FcNTf
684
1199
915
224
185
208
189
0,28
1,46
0,49
0,88
1159