2
04 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 54, No. 1, 2007
Lai et al.
¼
Cn) On (n = 5, 6) between adjacent layers in 1a are calcu-
lated as 2.85, and 2.57 Å, respectively; analogously, the
corresponding H-bond distances in 1b are calculated as
quadrupolarity of benzene moiety.
We thank National Chi Nan University and the Na-
tional Science Council (NSC 93-2113-M-260-002) for fi-
nancial support. The National Center of High-Performing
Computing and the Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica,
are also highly appreciated for providing the Beilstein data-
base system and the most helpful library service, respec-
tively.
3
.02, and 2.58 Å, respectively.
The conformations of azo dyes 1a, 1b and 1d were
further optimized by the CaChe program, using the AM1
model in the gas phases. After optimization, the bond dis-
tances of Oa-Cy and Ha’-Ob’ together with the dihedral an-
gles of Oa-Cx-Ob-Cy and Ha’-Cx’-Cy’-Ob’ for 1a, 1b and
1
d are further calculated (Table 2 and Fig. 7). The corre-
sponding bond distances and dihedral angles are not signif-
icantly different. This indicates that in the gas phase, the
conformation of molecules 1a, 1b and 1d might be quite
similar because of the absence of the polar attraction and
quadrupolar and intermolecular H-bonding interaction.
However, the conformations of molecules 1a, 1b and 1d in
the solid state are different because of these forces in the
corresponding molecular stackings.
Received November 23, 2005.
REFERENCES
1. (a) Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim,
1
995. (b) Hamilton, A. D. Perpectives in Supramolecular
Chemistry; John Wiley, 1996.
2. (a) Hunter, C. A. Angew. Chem. int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32,
Additionally, it is worthwhile to discuss the H-bond
interaction between different molecules in the same layer
¼
1
584. (b) Hunter, C. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1994, 23, 101.
3
. (a) Desiraju, G. R. Crystal Engineerring: The Design of Or-
ganic Solids; Elsevier: New York, 1989. (b) Desiraju, G. R.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 1475.
for 1a, 1b and 1d: The H-bond distances of H(at Cn) On
(
n = 3, 4) in 1a are calculated as 2.75 Å, and those of corre-
4
. (a) Lee, K. M.; Lee, C. M.; Lin, I. J. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1997, 36, 1850. (b) Chang, J.; Moore, J. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2655.
sponding distances are both 3.00 Å for 1b and 1d. The
stronger interaction between two ending functional groups
in 1a may lead to the bending of the molecular stacking as
shown in Fig. 5a and the resulting nematic phase is thus ob-
served. It is known that liquid crystal with SmA phase pos-
sesses a layer structure; additionally, if a regular hexagonal
arrangement exists among the layer structure, then a SmB
phase is expected. Based on the above observations, it is
clear that the interactions between adjacent layers are
stronger in 1d than those in 1b. This stronger interaction in
some regional areas leads to the breaking of regular hexag-
onal arrangement, and thus azo dye 1b shows a SmB phase
but 1d shows a SmA phase during the thermal process.
In summary, we have clearly showed that azo dyes
5
. (a) Lai, L. L.; Su, F. Y.; Hung, C. H. Liq. Cryst. 2004, 31,
7
73. (b) Lai, L. L.; Su, F. Y.; Lin, Y. J.; Ho, C. H.; Wang, E.;
Hung, C. H.; Liu, Y. H.; Wang, Y. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85,
517.
1
6. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL version 5.03, Siemens Analyti-
cal X-ray Instruments Inc., Wisconsin: Madison, 1994.
7
. (a) Lai, L. L.; Ho, C. H.; Lin, Y. J.; Wang, E.; Liu, Y. H.;
Wang, Y.; Lin, Y. C.; Cheng, K. L. Liq. Cryst. 2002, 29,
1
477. (b) Petrov, V. F. Liq. Cryst. 2001, 28, 217.
8
. (a) Haase, W.; Athanassopoulou, M. A. Structure and
Bonding 1999, 44, 140 and references cited therein. (b)
Ciunik, Z.; Desiraju, G. R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 703.
9. (a) Bondi, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441. (b) Allen, F. H.;
Lommerse, J. M. P.; Hoy, V. J.; Howard, J. K. H.; Desiraju,
G. R. Acta Cryst. 1996, B52, 734. (c) Thaimattam, R.; Xue,
F.; Sarma, J. A. R. P.; Mak, T. C. W.; Desiraju, G. R. J. Amer.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4432. (d) Muthuraman, M.; Masse,
R.; Nicoud, J.-F.; Desiraju, G. R. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13,
1
a, 1b and 1d, having the same core and different lengths of
alkyl chains, possess various mesogenic behaviours and
their corresponding molecular stackings are different based
1
0
on crystallographic study. Although we do not directly
demonstrate the exact molecular arrangements of 1a, 1b
and 1d in the liquid crystalline phases, we do show that dif-
ferent lengths of alkyl chain obviously can lead to the vari-
ous stackings of 1a, 1b and 1d in the solid state because of
the different interaction of functional polarity, H-bond and
1
473.
1
0. Crystals of 1a, 1b and 1d for crystallographic studies were
all grown from dichloromethane/hexane (1/1) at room tem-
perature.