(
)
300
H. Hase et al.rChemical Physics Letters 326 2000 299–303
trapping sites and interaction with their environments
such as ligand molecules and Auq atoms in solid
solutions, if they could be successfully produced by
the radiation–chemical method at low temperatures.
However, such comparative studies have been unsuc-
cessful because of the instability and the insolubility
of Auq monovalent compounds in many aqueous
and non-aqueous solvents.
In this study, we used two sets of solute–solvent
Ž
.
combination: AuClP C2 H5 in 2-methyltetrahydro-
3
Ž
.
furan MTHF and AuCN in 10 M NaOH and have
successfully produced Au0 atoms radiation–chem-
ically in these solid solutions at 77 K. ESR character-
istics of Au0 atoms in the solid solutions are ob-
tained and are compared with those of Au0 atoms
which were produced by the condensation method
Fig. 1. ESR spectra of Au0 atoms produced radiation–chemically
Ž .
Ž
.
.
in MTHF A and 10 M NaOH aqueous B solutions containing
Ž
AuClP C2 H5 and AuCN, respectively. The solute concentration
3
w x
was 2=10y2 M. The g-irradiation was carried out at 77 K and
the dose was typically 60 kGy. ESR measurements were done at
73 K.
8 . This pioneer study will initiate a variety of
experimental and theoretical studies of Au0 atoms in
the solid solutions hereafter.
Ž
.
Ž
.
mT are 165.2, 433.2 for MTHF and 157.9, 406.8
2. Experimental
for 10 M NaOH aqueous solutions. The values of the
magnetic field, mutual spacing of these lines are
similar to those of the corresponding two lines out of
four lines due to Au0 atoms which are produced by
the condensation method in various matrixes 8,9 .
Thus we conclude that Auq ions are reduced by
g-radiolysis of the solid solutions to be converted to
Au0 atoms and trapped in the matrixes at 77 K. The
observed lines at H1 and H2 are attributed to the
ESR transitions Fs1, ms1 Fs2, ms2 and
Fs2, msy2 Fs2, msy1 of Au atoms,
respectively, where m is the magnetic quantum num-
ber of the total moment of Au0 atoms FsJqI in
which J and I are, respectively, the electronic and
nuclear angular momenta. The alternative interpreta-
tion of the spectra is possible, if the hyperfine split-
Ž
.
AuClP C2 H5 of the purity claimed to be more
3
than 97% and the reagent grade AuCN and NaOH
were used. Reagent grade MTHF was distilled frac-
tionally and then dried over Na and K alloy. The
w
x
Ž
.
concentration of both AuClP C2 H5 in MTHF and
3
AuCN in 10 M NaOH was 2=10y2 M. The solu-
tions were first bubbled by N2 gas for a few minutes
and transferred into ESR tubes and then cooled to 77
K by immersing them into liquid nitrogen.. The
g-irradiation of the frozen samples was carried out at
the dose rate of 30 kGy hy1 at 77 K. The total dose
was typically 60 kGy for each sample. X-band ESR
measurements were carried out at 73 K by bubbling
helium gas into liquid nitrogen in an ESR Dewar to
avoid bubbling from liquid nitrogen.
Ž
.
0
Ž
.
w
x
ting is larger than the spectrometer frequency 8,9 :
Ž
The line at HsH1 is the ‘NMR’ transition Fs1,
.
msy1 Fs2, msy2 and the line at HsH2
3. Results and discussion
Ž
is the ESR transition Fs2, msy2 Fs2, m
. w
x
sy1 8,9 . However, we ascribe the two lines
observed at H1 and H2 to the ESR transitions, since
the calculated hyperfine splitting values are always
The ESR spectra of the irradiated MTHF and 10
M NaOH aqueous solutions are shown in Fig. 1 A
Ž .
Ž .
Ž
.
and B , respectively. In each spectrum, two separate
lower than the working frequency see Table 1 . The
ESR lines at H1 and H2 are accompanied by satellite
lines which are more clearly resolved in MTHF than
Ž
Ž
.
Ž
.
lines were observed at low- H1 and high- H2 mag-
netic fields. The values of H1, H2 in the units of
.