Paper
Dalton Transactions
Ru loading and graphite degree being almost the same the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese
because Ru NPs were stabilized mainly through the coordi- Academy of Sciences (XDB20000000).
nation interaction of nitrogen atoms in NPC; the interaction
was not strong enough to suppress the aggregation and leach-
ing during catalytic reactions. Thus, the catalytic activity of
Ru@NPC-2 gradually decreased after the consecutive catalytic
Notes and references
cycles. In sharp contrast, ultrafine Ru NPs in Ru@NPC-1
possessed high surface energy, but they were tightly anchored
on NPC; the interactions between NPC and Ru NPs
were much stronger than that observed for Ru@NPC-2, which
effectively inhibited the aggregation and coalescence during
catalytic reaction. Impressively, the ultrasmall size and uniform
distribution of Ru NPs were almost the same after consecutive
catalytic cycles. The integration of Ru NPs into NPC from the
COG precursor by the in situ growth strategy was beneficial for
enhancing the stability of the catalytic systems. It should be
mentioned that the protocol for the synthesis of ultrafine Ru
NPs exhibited excellent generality and could be extended to the
fabrication of other metallic NPs. The treatment of COG with
aqueous PdCl2 and K PtCl solutions under the same con-
1 C. Zhu, H. Li, S. Fu, D. Du and Y. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2016, 45, 517–531.
2 R. V. Jagadeesh, H. Junge, M. M. Pohl, J. Radnik,
A. Brgckner and M. Beller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135,
10776–10782.
3 K. N. Wood, R. O. Q. Hayre and S. Pylypenko, Energy
Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 1212–1249.
4 J. Zhu, L. Kong, X. Shen, H. Zhou, G. Zhu, Z. Ji, K. Xu and
S. A. Shah, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 9724–9732.
5 H. Zhong, Y. Wang, C. Cui, F. Zhou, S. Hu and R. Wang,
Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 8703–8710.
6 L. He, F. Weniger, H. Neumann and M. Beller, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 12582–12594.
7 H. Zhao and L. Zhao, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 3321–
3328.
8 J. Masa, W. Xia, M. Muhler and W. Schuhmann, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 10102–10120.
9 M. Mahyari and A. Shaabani, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2,
16652–16659.
2
6
ditions and subsequent pyrolysis at 600 and 800 °C under a
nitrogen atmosphere generated Pd@NPC and Pt@NPC, respect-
ively (Fig. S3†). Ultrafine Pd and Pt NPs were also obtained, and
their average particle sizes were 1.87 ± 0.4 and 1.83 ± 0.4 nm,
respectively, which were very close to that of Ru NPs.
1
1
0 W. Xin and Y. Song, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 83239–83285.
1 M. R. Benzigar, S. N. Talapaneni, S. Joseph, K. Ramadass,
G. Singh, J. Scaranto, U. Ravon, K. Al-Bahily and A. Vinu,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 2680–2721.
Conclusions
We developed a facile method for the in situ synthesis of
robust NPC-supported metal NPs through the use of COG con-
taining metal ions as the precursor for the first time.
Irrespective of the ultrafine size and narrow size distribution
of Ru NPs, the unprecedented catalytic performance in terms
of stability and reusability was displayed in the selective
reduction of nitroaromatic compounds. The ultrafine Ru NPs
still maintained their uniform dispersion, identical particle
size and high catalytic activity after consecutive cycles for eight
runs. The outstanding performance was mainly attributed to
intensive metal–support interactions when compared with that
of Ru NPs supported by NPC obtained by post-loading. This
study has demonstrated the unique advantages of COG for the
synthesis of robust ultrafine Ru NPs over NPC, and the pro-
posed protocol holds great promises for the general synthesis
of a broad range of ultrafine metal NPs supported by NPC for
various heterogeneous catalyses.
1
2 P. Zhang, Y. Gong, H. Li, Z. Chen and Y. Wang, Nat.
Commun., 2013, 4, 1593.
3 H. Zhao and L. Zhao, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 3321–3328.
4 R. Arrigo, M. E. Schuster, Z. Xie, Y. Yi, G. Wowsnick,
L. L. Sun, K. E. Hermann, M. Friedrich, P. Kast,
M. Haevecker, A. Knop-Gericke and R. Schlçgl, ACS Catal.,
1
1
2015, 5, 2740–2753.
1
5 X. Cui, Y. Li, S. Bachmann, M. Scalone, A. E. Surkus,
K. Junge, C. Topf and M. Beller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
137, 10652–10658.
1
1
6 W. Xia, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 630–644.
7 Z. Li, J. Li, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xia and F. Li, ChemCatChem,
2
014, 6, 1333–1339.
8 D. S. Su, S. Perathoner and G. Centi, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113,
782–5816.
1
1
2
2
2
2
5
9 M. N. Groves, A. S. W. Chan, C. Malardier-Jugroot and
M. Jugroot, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2009, 481, 214–219.
0 L. Zhang, A. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Liu, S. Miao,
J. Liu and T. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6563–6572.
Conflicts of interest
1 L. M. Ombaka, P. G. Ndungu and V. O. Nyamori, RSC Adv.,
2
015, 5, 109–122.
2 Z. Dong, X. Le, Y. Liu, C. Dong and J. Ma, J. Mater. Chem. A,
014, 2, 18775–18785.
3 X. Li, S. Zhao, W. Zhang, Y. Liu and R. Li, Dalton Trans.,
016, 45, 15595–15602.
There are no conflicts to declare.
2
Acknowledgements
2
This work was supported by the National Natural Science 24 Y. X. Zhou, Y. Z. Chen, L. Cao, J. Lu and H. L. Jiang, Chem.
Foundation of China (21603228, 21673241 and 21471151), and
Commun., 2015, 51, 8292–8295.
Dalton Trans.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019