Inorganic Chemistry
Article
toward a higher stability of the metal-ligand complex.6,20 It is
difficult to evaluate whether the lower energies found with
nitrates compared to without nitrates are due to the method
for calculating the aqueous Nd, which considers the Nd(NO3)2
hydrated species without the nitrate-ion hydration sphere, or a
real effect due to the insertion of additional atoms within the
first coordination shells, which somewhat destabilizes the
complex.
The PTdA ligands have been studied as 1:2 complexes, with
a potential addition of one nitrate ion, and 1:1 complexes with
an addition of three nitrate ions, as previously reported in the
literature for similar compounds.4,6 Convergence issues arose
for the frequency calculations of the biggest molecules, and the
free Gibbs energies could not be compared similarly to the
PTA ligands. For Nd-MTPTdA, the most stable stoichiometry
was the 1:2 complex without nitrate ions with an energy of
−285 kJ/mol, much higher than that of MTPTA, −76 kJ/mol.
The 1:2:1 complex was also stable (−188 kJ/mol) but not the
1:1:3 species (50 kJ/mol). This can be linked to the increased
Ln−O and Ln−N distances of the phenanthroline carbox-
amide upon nitrate addition (Table 5). However, as stated
Table 7. Difference between the Ln−O Distances of Ln in
Water for Their Most Stable CN and the Ln−O,N Distances
in Ln(MTPTA)2(NO3)2 and Ln(MTPTdA)2NO3 (CN =
a
10)
a
Ln-OH2
MTPTA
difference
MTPTdA
difference
La
Pr
2.585
2.540
2.520
2.490
2.460
2.430
2.380
2.679
2.614
2.611
2.584
2.561
2.535
2.501
0.094
0.074
0.091
0.094
0.101
0.105
0.121
2.679
2.647
2.643
2.604
2.583
2.571
2.532
0.094
0.107
0.123
0.114
0.123
0.141
0.152
Nd
Sm
Gd
Dy
Tm
a
Values taken from ref 21.
As predicted by the Gaussian calculation, there is an
important increase in distribution ratio in the presence of an
aromatic cycle onto the nitrogen atom of the amide and a
further increase with a higher number of methyl groups grafted
onto the phenyl ring (Figures 5−7).
Figure 5 shows the evolution of the distribution ratio along
the lanthanide series of four PTA ligands at two nitric acid
concentrations. Without any aromatic ring, low and rather flat
lanthanide distribution ratios are obtained at 0.1 M HNO3,
with a slight increase in light lanthanide with the increase in
nitric acid concentration. In the presence of an aromatic ring,
there is a maximum around Pr−Sm, which is in agreement with
Table 7. This maximum, as reported by Nakase et al.,16 can be
explained by ion-size effects: the cation lies in a cavity induced
by the N−N−O atoms of the phenanthroline, whose size is
better suited for the bigger light Lns, hence the preference of
all PTA and PTdA ligands toward the light Lns. To adapt to
the different ionic radii, the amide oxygens need to slightly
rotate, but this rotation is limited in the presence of the aryl
ring, making the cavity less suitable for the biggest cations La/
Ce. For all three extractants, increasing the nitric acid
concentration decreases the distribution ratio of light
lanthanides but has less influence on the heavy lanthanides.
The branched octyl compound, EHTPTA, has a lower
distribution ratio than the linear OTPTA, probably because
of additional steric effects. The trend along the lanthanide
series is however similar.
Figures 6 and 7 show the lanthanide distribution ratios of
several PTA and PTdA at 1 M NaNO3, with a variation in
ligand concentration for Figure 7. Again, very low distribution
ratios are obtained without any aromatic ring (Figure 6).
Interestingly, very different patterns are obtained with mono-
and dicarboxamide: PTA-nitrate systems show a maximum
within the light Ln (Pr−Sm) followed by a slight decrease all
along the series, whereas PTdA-nitrate systems show a sharp
decrease from La to Sm followed by a quasi-plateau, this latter
trend being also observed by Ustynyuk et al.4 with their
dicarboxamide aryl ligands. This difference indicates a different
ligand coordination, which was not unexpected considering
that PTA ligands coordinate as tridentate (2 N, 1 O) and
PTdA ligands coordinate as tetradentate (2 N, 2 O), yielding,
respectively, coordination numbers of 6 and 8 for PTA and
PTdA, respectively, for the expected 1:2 complexes.
Table 5. Mean Distances of the Closest Atoms around Nd in
MTPTdA Ligands for the 1:2:0, 1:2:1, and 1:1:3
Stoichiometries, Calculated in the Gas Phase
(MTPTdA)2
(MTPTdA)2NO3
MTPTdA(NO3)3
Nd−O
Nd−N
Nd−O (NO3)
2.49
2.68
NA
2.55
2.75
2.61
2.59
2.75
2.56
above, the increase in free Gibbs energies upon addition of
nitrate ions could be due to the different aqueous species
considered, as the literature usually considers the 1:1:3 species
for calculations,4,6 even though slope analysis confirmed the
presence of both 1:1 and 1:2 species.4,13 Moreover, complex
stability was reported to depend on diluents,13 which was not
considered here.
Table 6 provides the distances Nd−N and Nd−O for three
PTdA ligands without nitrate ions, as it was shown to be the
Table 6. Mean Distances of the Closest Atoms around Nd in
PTdA Ligands Having 0−2 Methyl Groups Attached to the
Aniline, Calculated in the Gas Phase without Nitrate Ions
MPPTdA
MTPTdA
MdMAPTdA
Nd−O
Nd−N
2.47
2.68
2.49
2.69
2.44
2.64
most stable. The trend is somewhat different from that of PTA,
as MTPTdA presents slightly longer distances than MPPTdA.
MdMAPTdA still has the shortest distances.
Because of the lanthanide series contraction, the ionic radii
decrease with increasing atomic number. Therefore, the
distance between lanthanide ions and their hydration
molecules in aqueous media also decreases. A similar effect
is expected for extractants in organic phase, as shown by the
calculated distances in Table 7. Interestingly, this decrease is
more pronounced for the ligands than for the hydration sphere,
as the difference between the distances increases with atomic
number, except for Pr-MTPTA and Sm-MTPTdA.
The higher distribution ratio found for Gd with PTdA has
not been fully understood yet, as this exception was not
reported for similar compounds.4,13 The first hypothesis was a
higher content of Gd in the lanthanide mix, but the ICP-MS
analysis did not show any higher concentration of Gd than the
Extraction Results. Extraction experiments of the whole
Ln series have then been performed.
D
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX