Calc. for C
8
H
6
◦
O
4
: C 57.83, H 3.61. Found: C 57.85, H 3.62%.
Electrochemical measurements
-1
Mp 240–242 C. Significant IR bands (KBr, v cm ): 3550–3200
v(O–H), 1669 v(C O), 1319 v(C–H, aldehyde), 1288 v(C–O). H
NMR (CDCl
1
Electrochemical measurements were controlled on a CH In-
struments model 660B Electrochemical Workstation (Shanghai
Chenhua Instruments, Shanghai) using a three electrode set-up
3
) d/ppm: 7.08 (d, 1H, ph-H), 8.26 (d, 1H, ph-H),
8
.398 (s, 1H, ph-H), 9.98 (s, 2H, CHO), 11.49 (s, 1H, OH).
2
comprising of a glassy carbon disc (surface area of 0.071 cm )
working, platinum wire auxiliary and a saturated calomel reference
3
-Formyl-4-hydroxybenzoic acid ethyl ester (C10
H
10
4
O ). 3-
(SCE) electrode (All potentials relative to this electrode).
Formyl-4-hydroxybenzoic acid (0.02 mol, 3.32 g) was dissolved
in 20 mL ethanol and then 1 mL sulfuric acid was added with
stirring. After refluxing for 10 h the solution was added into 200
mL cold water to obtain the crude product. The crude product
was extracted by 0.01 M sodium carbonate aqueous solution and
then dried in vacuum to obtain a pure white solid (81%). Anal.
Electropolymerization was performed in nitrogen-saturated
DMSO solution containing 5 ¥ 10 M copper complex and 0.1 M
-4
NaNO as supporting electrolyte. The modified electrode was used
3
to perform the scan-rate dependent study in nitrogen saturated
DMSO solution. The EIS was performed in 5 mM equiv. molar
3-
4-
ratio of [Fe(CN)
6
] /[Fe(CN) ] solution containing 0.1 M KCl,
6
Calc. for C10
H
10
◦
O
4
: C 61.86, H 5.15. Found C 61.79, H 5.30%.
at 0.188 V and frequency ranges from 0.1 to 20 kHz.
Electrocatalytic oxidation of ascorbic acid and amperometric
-1
Mp 60.2–60.8 C. Significant IR bands (KBr, v cm ): 3401 v(O–
H), 1709 v(C O, aldehyde), 1661 v(C O, ester), 1281 v(Cph–O),
determination of H A were all performed in pH 6.8 PBS solutions
2
1
1
214, 1179 v(C–O–C). H NMR (CDCl
3
) d/ppm: 1.41 (t, 3H,
containing 0.1 M KCl with a volume of 8 mL. Amperometric
determination was performed at an applied potential of 0.2 V vs.
CH
3
), 4.39 (m, 2H, CH ), 7.04 (d, 1H, ph-H), 8.20 (d, 1H, ph-H),
2
8
.33 (s, 1H, ph-H), 9.96 (s, 1H, CHO), 11.39 (s, 1H, OH).
SCE and 8 mL of different concentrations of H A were injected to
2
the electrolytic cell successively with constant magnetic stirring.
For the vitamin C tablets analysis, the ground vitamin tablets were
dissolved in double distilled water. 8 mL of tablet solution was
injected to the determination system five times and then 8 mL of
Synthesis of complex [Cu
2
(Sal-GLy)
2
(H
2
O)
2
]
3
-Formyl-4-hydroxybenzoic acid ethyl ester (1 mmol, 0.194 g) and
glycine (1.2 mmol, 0.090 g) were dissolved in aqueous methanol
80%, 20 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30
2
H A solution of known concentration was added.
(
min to give a clear yellow solution. Then an aqueous solution (10
mL) of copper acetate (1 mmol, 0.200 g) was added with stirring.
The mixture was stirred and refluxed at 323 K for 6 h, then cooled
to room temperature. After filtration, the filtrate was left to stand at
room temperature. Green crystals were obtained after two weeks,
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jing Yang for helping us in the article’s modification.
References
yield 0.204 g (61.5%). Anal. Calc. for C24
H
26Cu
2
N
2
O12: C 43.53,
1
(a) M. N. Zhang, K. Liu, L. Xiang, Y. Q. Lin, L. Su and L. Q. Mao,
Anal. Chem., 2007, 79, 6559; (b) H. A. Kontos, Stroke, 2001, 32, 2712.
G. Glgelashvili and A. Schousboe, Brain Res. Bull., 1998, 45, 233.
N 4.23, H 3.93; found C 43.77, N 4.26, H 3.89%. Significant IR
-
1
bands (KBr, v cm ): 3420 v(O–H, coord. water), 1690 v(C O,
2
-
-
ester), 1605 vas(COO ), 1646 v(C N), 1375 v
s
(COO ), 1276 v(Cph
–
3 R. Kirk and R. Sawyer, Pearson’s Composition and Analysis of Food,
-
4
O), 1240, 11193 v(C–O–C). UV-Vis (DMSO, c = 1 ¥ 10 M) lmax
361 (3.77), 297 (4.36), 264 (log e = 4.31) nm.
9th edn, Longman, Harlow, UK, 1991.
4
(a) E. S. Wagner, B. Lindley and R. D. Coffin, J. Chromatogr., 1979,
53, 225; (b) A. Khan, M. I. Khan, Z. Iqbal, Y. Shah, L. Ahmad, S.
Nazir, D. G. Watson, J. A. Khan, F. Nasir, A. Khan and Ismail, Talanta,
011, 84, 789.
=
1
2
X-Ray crystallography
5 W. M. Zeng, F. Martinuzzi and A. MacGregor, J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal., 2005, 36, 1107.
Details of the crystal parameters, data collection and refinements
are listed in Table 1. Diffraction data were collected on a
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer with a graphite-
6 (a) T. Egberg, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1977, 60, 126; (b) K. Ishii, K.
Kubo, T. Sakurada, K. Komori and Y. Sakai, Chem. Commun., 2011,
4
7, 4932.
7
(a) S. A. Kumar, P. H. Lo and S. M. Chen, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2008,
24, 518; (b) A. P. dos Reis, C. R. T. Tarley, N. Maniasso and L. T.
Kubota, Talanta, 2005, 67, 829.
˚
monochromated Mo-Ka (l = 0.71073 A) radiation source using
the w–2q scan technique at 298(2) K. Raw data collection and
8
9
(a) R. N. Adams, Anal. Chem., 1976, 48, 1126A; (b) C. R. Raj, K.
Tokuda and T. Ohsaka, Bioelectrochemistry, 2001, 53, 183.
cell refinement were achieved using SMART; data reduction
+
was performed using SAINT and corrected for Lorentz and
(a) R. S. Freire and L. T. Kubota, Analyst, 2002, 127, 1502; (b) S.
Shahrokhian and M. Karimi, Electrochim. Acta, 2004, 50, 77; (c) S.
Sadeghi, A. Gafarzadeh, M. A. Naseri and H. Sharghi, Sens. Actuators,
B, 2004, 98, 174; (d) E. A. Huttona, R. Pauliukait e˙ , S. B. Hocevara,
B. Ogorevca and M. R. Smythb, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2010, 678,
polarization effects. Absorption corrections were applied using the
33
SADABS routine. The structure was solved by direct methods
using SHELXTL and was refined by full-matrix least-squares
2
34
on F using SHELX-97. Visualization of the structures was
1
76.
35
performed using DIAMOND. All non-hydrogen atoms were
refined anisotropically. All non-solvent H-atoms were located in
their calculated positions and treated as riding on the atoms to
which they were attached with isotropic displacement parameters
10 Y. N. Wang, K. C. Lau, W. W. Y. Lam, W. L. Man, C. F. Leung and T.
C. Lau, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 400.
1
1 (a) X. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. R. Zhang and Z. S. Yang, Spectrochim.
Acta, Part A, 2010, 77, 1; (b) Y. Y. Kou, J. L. Tian, D. D. Li, W. Gu,
X. Liu, S. P. Yan, D. Z. Liao and P. Cheng, Dalton Trans., 2009, 2374;
(c) P. A. N. Reddy, M. Nethaji and A. R. Chakravarty, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 2004, 1440.
U
iso values were set to 1.2Ueq for aryl H and 1.5Ueq for methyl
H and amino H. Hydrogen atoms riding on H O were placed in
2
1
2 (a) N. Poulter, M. Donaldson, G. Mulley, L. Duque, N. Waterfield, A.
G. Shard, S. Spencer, A. T. A. Jenkins and A. L. Johnson, New J. Chem.,
2011, 35, 1477; (b) M. T. Kaczmarek, R. Jastrz a˛ b, E. Hołderna-K e˛ dzia
optimised positions and refined isotropically to be constrained to
ride on their parent atom.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 1252–1258 | 1257