Reactivity of Free-tert-Butylphenylmethylene
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 21, 1998 7411
C-C-CH3 angle, would raise steric interactions between
ortho hydrogens and the methyl groups and is not
observed.
but the phenyl groups have rotated completely out of the
plane formed by the carbene carbon and its attached
atoms. In the present case, the energy required to reach
the transition state for C-C insertion (TS2-4 in Figure
2) of 3.8 kcal/mol is only 2.0 kcal/mol higher than that
required for C-H insertion. This is an energy difference
that can be evaluated experimentally. In the following
paragraphs we report our efforts to make this evaluation.
Exp er im en ta l In vestiga tion s of th e En er gy a n d
Rea ctivity of 2. A persistent problem in examining
carbene reactivity is the fact that one must take care to
ensure that it is the reactions of the free carbene rather
than those of a precursor that are being studied.14,17 This
seems to be a particular problem in the case of nitrog-
enous carbene precursors (diazo compounds and diazir-
ines) in which the precursor, either in its ground or
excited state, also yields carbene type products. This
problem has been circumvented in two general ways. The
first is simply to avoid the use of nitrogenous precursors
and employ alternatives such as the deoxygenation of
carbonyl compounds by atomic carbon5,18,19 and cheleo-
tropic extrusion of carbenes from cyclopropanes.6,19 The
second approach is to use a nitrogenous precursor fol-
lowed by rearrangement to a new carbene that is
distinctively separated from its precursor on the reactive
energy surface. This method has been used successfully
by generating a carbene that undergoes the phenylcar-
bene rearrangement20,21 to a new carbene that is now
capable of intramolecular rearrangement to stable prod-
ucts.18,22 In the present investigation, we have used the
second of these approaches to study 2.
Gen er a tion of 2 by th e P h en ylca r ben e Rea r -
r a n gem en t. In an attempt to avoid complications
associated with the chemistry of nitrogenous carbene
precursors, we have followed the lead of Chambers and
J ones22 and generated 2 by the phenylcarbene rearrange-
ment of p-tert-butylphenylcarbene, 5. The starting point
for the formation of 2 was p-tert-butylbenzaldehyde
tosylhydrazone lithium salt, 6. When 6 is mildly heated,
p-tert-butylphenyldiazomethane, 7, is evolved and may
then be passed into a tube furnace and pyrolyzed to yield
5. The phenylcarbene rearrangement then converts 5 to
the m- and o-tert-butylphenylcarbenes, 8 and 9, and then
to 2. When Chambers and J ones22 studied this reaction,
they found that some 9 was intramolecularly trapped as
dimethylindane while the remainder rearranged to 2,
which had been previously shown23 to yield both 3 and 4
As expected, 2 has a triplet ground state with a
singlet-triplet (S-T) splitting of 8.0 kcal/mol calculated
at the PMP2/6-31G(d)//MP2/6-31G(d)+ZPC/6-31(d) level.
To assess the singlet-triplet splitting accurately, we have
calculated the S-T in PC at this level and compared it
to our value for 2. Recent computational studies place
the S-T splitting in PC at 4-6 kcal/mol,12 in good
agreement with experiment.15 Our PMP2/6-31G(d)//MP2/
6-31G(d)+ZPC/6-31(d) value for S-T in PC is 7.8 kcal/
mol, indicating that our calculated singlet-triplet gap
in 2 is too high by ∼3 kcal/mol, leading to an actual value
of 5-6 kcal/mol. A comparison of this S-T gap to that
we have reported in 1 of 1-2 kcal/mol demonstrates that
the presence of the phenyl group increases the S-T gap
by 4-5 kcal/mol. In contrast to singlet 2, the triplet
adopts a geometry, 2d , that allows maximum overlap
between the carbene p orbital and the π orbitals of the
ring. In this case, the phenyl ring lies in the plane
formed by the carbene carbon and its attached atoms. It
is probable that the ability of the triplet to accommodate
a larger angle about the carbene carbon than the singlet
(138.5° vs 119.3°) brings about lowered steric interactions
between the tert-butyl group and the ring, allowing
maximum overlap between the carbene p orbital and the
aromatic π orbitals in the planar carbene conformer.
These considerations may be responsible for an abnor-
mally large S-T gap in 2. In the absence of steric
interactions, the addition of alkyl groups to carbene
centers lowers the S-T gap.16 Thus, we may have
expected a smaller S-T gap in 2 relative to PC. How-
ever, geometry constraints placed on singlet 2 by its
electronic structure increase steric interactions, raise the
energy of the singlet, and increase the S-T gap.
An inspection of the minimized geometry calculated for
singlet 2a in Figure 3 reveals a Me-CR-Ccarbene angle of
101.0°, in marked contrast to the angle of 79.8° calculated
for carbene 1.5 While the smaller than normal Me-CR-
Ccarbene angle in 2 indicates some stabilization by the
adjacent C-C σ bond, the effect is far less dramatic than
in 1. In the present case, it appears that, although the
stabilization of the carbene p orbital by the phenyl is not
optimal, it is sufficient to avoid the necessity of ap-
preciable bridging by neighboring σ bonds.
This lack of stabilization by bridging in 2 leads to a
ground-state geometry in 2a which is quite different from
the geometry calculated for the transition state for
intramolecular C-H insertion to give 3 (TS2-3 in Figure
2). Thus, unlike carbene 1, which is calculated to
undergo intramolecular C-H insertion with little or no
barrier, there is a higher barrier (1.8 kcal/mol) in 2. The
(17) (a) Moss, R. A.; Liu, W. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993,
1597. (b) Modarelli, D. A.; Morgan, S.; Platz, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 7034. (c) Chen, N.; J ones, M., J r.; White, W. R.; Platz, M.
S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4981. (d) Seburg, R. A.; McMahon, R.
J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7183. (e) Tomioka, H.; Kitagawa, H.;
Izawa, Y. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3072. (f) Yamamoto, N.; Bernardi,
F.; Bottoni, A.; Olivucci, M.; Robb, M. A.; Wilsey, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 2064. (g) Liu, M. T. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 287.
(18) Fox, J . M.; Scacheri, J . E. G.; J ones, K. G. H.; J ones, M., J r.;
Shevlin, P. B.; Armstrong B.; Sztyrbicka, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 5021.
geometries of 1 and 2 are compared in Figure 3.
A
comparison of the geometries of the transition states in
Figure 2 with that of 2a reveals that geometric factors
lower the differences in energies required for intramo-
lecular C-H and C-C insertion in 2 relative to 1. Not
only do TS2-3 and TS2-4 have substantially smaller Me-
Ca-Ccarbene angles than 2a (76.4° and 68.5°, respectively)
(19) Thamattoor, D. M., J ones, M., J r.; Pan, W.; Shevlin, P. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8333.
(20) For reviews of the extensively studied phenylcarbene rear-
rangement see: (a) J ones, W. M. In Rearrangements in Ground and
Excited States; de Mayo, P., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1980; Vol. 1.
(b) Wentrup, C. In Methoden der Organischen Chemie (Houben-Weyl);
Regitz, M., Ed.; G. Thieme: Stuttgart, 1989; Vol. E19b, pp 824-1021.
(c) Gaspar, P. P.; Hsu, J .-P.; Chari, S.; J ones, M., J r. Tetrahedron 1985,
41, 1479. (d) Platz, M. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 487.
(21) For recent computational studies of the phenylcarbene rear-
rangement see ref 12.
(15) (a) Admasu, A.; Gudmundsdo´tter, A. D.; Platz, M. S. J . Phys.
Chem. A 1997, 101, 3832. (b) Poutsma, J . C. Nash, J . J .; Paulino, J .
A.; Squires, R. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4686.
(16) Sulzbach, H. M.; Bolton, E.; Lenoir, D.; Schleyer, P. v. R.;
Schaefer, H. F., III J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9908, and references
therein.
(22) Chambers, G. R.; J ones, M., J r. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 52,
5193.