concentrations to impact GCS. Importantly, with short-
term dosing, inhibitor 3h was observed to significantly lower
brain GlcCer levels. This effect was specific for this analog
in that eliglustat failed to demonstrate any change in brain
cerebroside content under identical dosing conditions, even
though it significantly lowered liver and kidney glycolip-
ids. This finding confirmed that developing a high-affinity
GCS inhibitor (3h) with a lack of recognition by MDR1
is able to result in a pharmacological response in the brain.
In summary, the present study outlines a general strat-
egy for the design and testing of compounds that lack
MDR1 affinity and identifies a new PDMP analog that ap-
pears to satisfy the properties of high inhibitory activity
against GCS and limited MDR1 affinity. Because the con-
cept of synthesis inhibition for the treatment of glycosphin-
golipidoses by PDMP-based GCS inhibitors is now well
established on both experimental and clinical grounds,
the identification of a related compound that is active
within brain is encouraging. Specifically, the D-threo-
ethylendioxyphenyl analogs of PDMP are characterized by
inhibition of GCS at low nanomolar concentrations, high
specificity, and the absence of ꢁ-glucocerebrosidase bind-
ing. Recent phase 2 clinical data for eliglustat tartrate have
demonstrated a clinical response in type 1 Gaucher dis-
ease that is comparable to enzyme replacement therapy as
measured by reduction in spleen and liver volume, correc-
tion of anemia, and improvement in thrombocytopenia.
The untoward effects observed with NBDNJ, including
weight loss, diarrhea, and tremor, were not observed in
this clinical trial nor in an extension study. These observa-
tions are consistent with the high specificity of the drug
and its absence of CNS penetration.
3. Shayman, J. A., L. Lee, A. Abe, and L. Shu. 2000. Inhibitors of glu-
cosylceramide synthase. Methods Enzymol. 311: 373–387.
4
. Weinreb, N. J., J. A. Barranger, J. Charrow, G. A. Grabowski, H. J.
Mankin, and P. Mistry. 2005. Guidance on the use of miglustat for
treating patients with type 1 Gaucher disease. Am. J. Hematol. 80:
2
23–229.
5
. Shayman, J. A. 2010. Eliglustat tartrate. Drugs Future. 35: 613–621.
. Lukina, E., N. Watman, E. A. Arreguin, M. Banikazemi, M. Dragosky,
M. Iastrebner, H. Rosenbaum, M. Phillips, G. M. Pastores, D. I.
Rosenthal, et al. 2010. A phase 2 study of eliglustat tartrate (Genz-
6
1
12638), an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease
type 1. Blood. 116: 893–899.
7. Abe, A., S. Gregory, L. Lee, P. D. Killen, R. O. Brady, A. Kulkarni,
and J. A. Shayman. 2000. Reduction of globotriaosylceramide in
Fabry disease mice by substrate deprivation. J. Clin. Invest. 105:
1
563–1571.
8
. Liu, Y., R. Wada, H. Kawai, K. Sango, C. Deng, T. Tai, M. P.
McDonald, K. Araujo, J. N. Crawley, U. Bierfreund, et al. 1999. A
genetic model of substrate deprivation therapy for a glycosphingo-
lipid storage disorder. J. Clin. Invest. 103: 497–505.
9
. Miller, D. S. 2010. Regulation of P-glycoprotein and other ABC
drug transporters at the blood-brain barrier. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
3
1: 246–254.
1
0. Hirth, B. H., and C. Siegel. 2005. Synthesis of UDP-glucose:
N-acylsphingosine glucosyltransferase inhibitors. Patent no.
6,855,830. Genzyme Corporation, United States.
1
1. Shayman, J. A., and A. Abe. 2000. Glucosylceramide synthase: assay
and properties. Methods Enzymol. 311: 42–49.
1
2. Shu, L., and J. A. Shayman. 2003. Src kinase mediates the regula-
tion of phospholipase C-gamma activity by glycosphingolipids. J.
Biol. Chem. 278: 31419–31425.
1
3. Shu, C., H. Shen, N. S. Teuscher, P. J. Lorenzi, R. F. Keep, and D.
E. Smith. 2002. Role of PEPT2 in peptide/mimetic trafficking at
the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier: studies in rat choroid plexus
epithelial cells in primary culture. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 301:
8
20–829.
1
4. Wishart, D. S., C. Knox, A. C. Guo, D. Cheng, S. Shrivastava, D.
Tzur, B. Gautam, and M. Hassanali. 2008. DrugBank: a knowledge-
base for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:
D901–D906.
5. Jimbo, M., K. Yamagishi, T. Yamaki, K. Nunomura, K. Kabayama, Y.
Igarashi, and J. I. Inokuchi. 2000. Development of a new inhibitor
of glucosylceramide synthase. J. Biochem. 127: 485–491.
1
Although the absence of eliglustat tartrate distribution
into brain may be advantageous for glycosphingolipidoses
without CNS manifestations, including type 1 Gaucher
and Fabry diseases, our identification of a PDMP homolog
that crosses the BBB is of potential therapeutic benefit for
disorders such as GM2 gangliosidoses, Tay-Sachs, Sand-
hoff disease, and types 2 and 3 Gaucher disease. Excellent
murine models for these disorders exist and, following the
characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile of 3h, will
provide the basis for experimental proof of principle for
the use of synthesis inhibition in these disorders. Finally,
recent work has defined a mechanistic association between
loss of glucocerebrosidase activity, neuronal GlcCer accu-
mulation, and ꢄ-synuclein accumulation (30). These find-
ingsprovideapotentialexplanationforthehighassociation
of type 1 Gaucher disease with Parkinson’s disease. The
identification of a potent GCS inhibitor with CNS activity
provides a pharmacological tool for further assessing this
association and possible therapeutic intervention.
1
6. Lee, L., A. Abe, and J. A. Shayman. 1999. Improved inhibitors of
glucosylceramide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 14662–14669.
7. Lipinski, C. A., F. Lombardo, B. W. Dominy, and P. J. Feeney. 2001.
Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility
and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv.
Drug Deliv. Rev. 46: 3–26.
1
1
1
2
8. Garberg, P., M. Ball, N. Borg, R. Cecchelli, L. Fenart, R. D. Hurst,
T. Lindmark, A. Mabondzo, J. E. Nilsson, T. J. Raub, et al. 2005.
In vitro models for the blood-brain barrier. Toxicol. In Vitro. 19:
2
99–334.
9. Wang, Q., J. D. Rager, K. Weinstein, P. S. Kardos, G. L. Dobson, J.
Li, and I. J. Hidalgo. 2005. Evaluation of the MDR-MDCK cell line
as a permeability screen for the blood-brain barrier. Int. J. Pharm.
2
88: 349–359.
0. Gouaze-Andersson, V., and M. C. Cabot. 2006. Glycosphingolipids
and drug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1758: 2096–2103.
21. Mahar Doan, K. M., J. E. Humphreys, L. O. Webster, S. A. Wring,
L. J. Shampine, C. J. Serabjit-Singh, K. K. Adkison, and J. W. Polli.
2
002. Passive permeability and P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux dif-
ferentiate central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS marketed
drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 303: 1029–1037.
22. Leeson, P. D., and A. M. Davis. 2004. Time-related differences
in the physical property profiles of oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 47:
6
338–6348.
2
3. Pajouhesh, H., and G. R. Lenz. 2005. Medicinal chemical properties
of successful central nervous system drugs. NeuroRx. 2: 541–553.
4. Cecchelli, R., V. Berezowski, S. Lundquist, M. Culot, M. Renftel,
M. P. Dehouck, and L. Fenart. 2007. Modelling of the blood-brain
barrier in drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6:
650–661.
REFERENCES
2
1
2
. Barton, N. W., R. O. Brady, J. M. Dambrosia, A. M. Di Bisceglie, S.
H. Doppelt, S. C. Hill, H. J. Mankin, G. J. Murray, R. I. Parker, C.
E. Argoff, et al. 1991. Replacement therapy for inherited enzyme
deficiency–macrophage-targeted glucocerebrosidase for Gaucher’s
disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 324: 1464–1470.
. Radin, N. S. 1996. Treatment of Gaucher disease with an enzyme
inhibitor. Glycoconj. J. 13: 153–157.
25. Lundquist, S., M. Renftel, J. Brillault, L. Fenart, R. Cecchelli, and
M. P. Dehouck. 2002. Prediction of drug transport through the
blood-brain barrier in vivo: a comparison between two in vitro cell
models. Pharm. Res. 19: 976–981.
2
90
Journal of Lipid Research Volume 53, 2012