c
developed is a simple yet general way to functionalize and P (area under PL peak), where the subscripts a, b, and c
nanoparticles. In ambient environment, the QD ionic liquids denote the measurements aforementioned. The quantum yield is
[
23]
aresolventfreeandmorestablethanthesameQDsdispersedin then calculated by the simple equation
a solvent.
PcLb ꢁ PbLc
h ¼
:
LaðLb ꢁ LcÞ
Experimental Section
We verified that the accuracy of this method is about ꢄ2%.
Synthesis of colloidal PbS QDs: Lead (II) oxide (220mg, 1 mmol,
9
9.999%), oleic acid (0.64 mL, 2 mmol, 90%), and 1-octadecene
ODE, 9.36 mL, 90%) are mixed and stirred at 150 8C under pure
nitrogen environment. At the same time, a 0.1 M hexamethyldisi-
lathiane ((TMS) S, 126 mL, 0.6mmol) in ODE (6mL) is stirred in a
glove box for at least 30 minutes. After the reaction solution
containing PbO) turns clear, the temperature is set to 908C and
allowed to stabilize. Then, 5 mL of the (TMS) S/ODE solution (0.5
Keywords:
(
.
.
.
.
conductivity ionic liquids lead salts photostability
quantum dots
2
[
[
[
1] F. W. Wise, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 773.
2] I. Kang, F. W. Wise, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1997, 14, 1632.
(
2
3] S. A. McDonald, G. Konstantatos, S. Zhang, P. W. Cyr, E. J. D. Klem,
L. Levina, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 138.
4] J. J. Choi, Y.-F. Lim, M. B. Santiago-Berrios, M. Oh, B.-R. Hyun,
L. Sun, A. C. Bartnik, A. Goedhart, G. G. Malliaras, H. D. Abru n˜ a,
F. W. Wise, T. Hanrath, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3749.
5] B.-R. Hyun, H. Chen, D. A. Rey, F. W. Wise, C. A. Batt, J. Phys. Chem.
B 2007, 111, 5726.
mmol sulfur) is drawn into a syringe and injected into the reaction
solution. After reacting for 1 min, the reaction solution is rapidly
cooled with an ice bath. The growth solution is then mixed with
[
[
5
mL hexane. Excess oleic acid and unreacted precursors are
removed by precipitating the particles using incompatible solvents,
for example, methanol. The NCs are redispersed in toluene and
stored in the dark under an inert atmosphere.
[
[
6] E. H. Sargent, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 515.
7] J. S. Steckel, S. Coe-Sullivan, V. Bulovi c´ , M. G. Bawendi, Adv.
Mater. 2003, 15, 1862.
8] R. Rodriguez, R. Herrera, L. A. Archer, E. P. Giannelis, Adv. Mater.
Synthesis of ionic liquid ligands: Sodium 3-mercapto-1-propa-
nesulfonate (0.2g, 1.12 mmol, technical grade, 90%) is dissolved
in 4 mL deionized water. The solution is run through an ion
exchange column (Dowex, HCR-W2 ion exchange resin) to remove
[
2008, 20, 1.
[9] A. B. Bourlinos, S. R. Chowdhury, D. D. Jiang, Y.-U. An, Q. Zhang,
L. A. Archer, E. P. Giannelis, Small, 2005, 1, 80.
þ
Na ions and fully protonate the sulfonate groups present. The fully
[
10] A. B. Bourlinos, A. Stassinopoulos, D. Anglos, R. Herrera,
S. H. Anastasiadis, D. Petridis, E. P. Giannelis, Small, 2006, 2, 513.
11] A. B. Bourlinos, R. Herrera, N. Chalkias, D. D. Jiang, Q. Zhang,
L. A. Archer, E. P. Giannelis, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 234.
protonated solution shows a distinct pH value change (from 2.75 to
0). Polyetheramine (0.67g, 1.12 mmol, Jeffamine XTJ505, XTJ506) is
[
mixed with 3 mL deionized water and then added dropwise to the
mercaptosulfuric solution while monitoring the pH increase. Once [12] S. C. Warren, M. J. Banholzer, L. S. Slaughter, E. P. Giannelis,
the equivalence point is reached, the reaction mixture is kept at
room temperature overnight under shaking. Then the solvent is
evaporated by placing the solution in a vacuum oven for drying at
F. J. DiSalvo, U. B. Wiesner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12074.
13] M. Green, P. Rahmana, D. Smyth-Boyle, Chem. Commun. 2007,
[
[
5
74.
14] C. B. Murray, C. R. Kagan, M. G. Bawendi, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.
000, 30, 545.
35 8C until all the solvent is removed. Equivalence point plots are
2
used to determine the necessary amount of reagents to achieve a
[
15] M. A. Hines, G. D. Scholes, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1844.
16] L. Sun, L. Bao, B.-R. Hyun, A. C. Bartnik, Y.-W. Zhong, J. C Reed, D.-
W. Pang, Hector, D. Abru n˜ a, G. G. Malliaras, F. W. Wise, Nano Lett.
2009, 9, 789.
1:1 ratio of mercaptosulfonic acid to amine.
[
Absolute quantum yield measurement: An integrating sphere
(
IS; IS200, Thorlabs) that has its inner surface coated with a
[
17] H. Ohno, Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, Wiley, New
Jersey 2005, p. 19.
18] A. K. Jonscher, Nature 1977, 267, 673.
diffusely reflecting material – PTFE – is used to redistribute the
light isotropically over the sphere interior surface. A solid-state
laser (wavelength 635 nm) beam enter the IS through the input
port. At the output port of the IS, an optical-fiber bundle is used to
collect and send the light to a spectrometer (SpectraPro 275,
[
[
[
19] M. Pollak, G. E. Pike, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972, 28, 1449.
ˇ
20] A. Santi c´ , W. Wrobel, M. Mutke, R. D. Banhatti, K. Funke, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 5930.
Acton). A femtowatt photoreceiver (Model 2151, New Focus) is [21] K. Funke, R. D. Banhatti, S. Br u¨ ckner, C. Cramer, C. Krieger,
A. Mandanici, C. Martiny, I. Ross, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
mounted on the exit side of the spectrometer to measure the
2
002, 4, 3155.
dispersed light power. The laser beam is chopped by a fan and a
lock-in amplifier is used to depress the background noise during
measurements. The spectral response of the entire system is
calibrated using a quartz tungsten halogen lamp (20 W QTH,
Newport). The sample is loaded into a small glass cuvette or drop-
[
22] a) H. Vogel, Phys. Z. 1921, 22, 645; V. G. Tammann, W. Z. Hesse,
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1926, 156, 245; b) G. S. J. Fulcher, Am. Ceram.
Soc. Bull. 1925, 8, 339.
23] J. C. De Mello, H. F. Wittmann, R. H. Friend, Adv. Mater. 1997, 9,
230.
[
cast onto a glass slide and then mounted to a sample holder that [24] R. C. Benson, H. A. Kues, J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977, 22, 379.
[
25] J. J. Peterson, T. D. Krauss, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3851.
26] D. Kuang, P. Wang, S. Ito, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Gr a¨ tzel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7732.
allows the sample to pass in and out of the laser beam. Three
spectra are taken: a) laser beam only, b) sample in IS but off the
laser beam, and c) sample in the laser beam. In each photon-
number spectrum (intensity ꢃ wavelength verus wavelength), five
[
Received: November 26, 2009
Published online: February 2, 2010
parameters are calculated, L
a
, L
b
, L
c
(area under laser peak), P
b
small 2010, 6, No. 5, 638–641
ß 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.small-journal.com 641