Liu et al.
This result is consistent with trapping of the singlet
state of the acylnitrene. Different results are obtained
with alkoxycarbonyl azides, which form mixtures of
aziridines upon photolysis, in the presence of alkenes.6
TABLE 1. Singlet-Triplet Energy Gap [∆H (298 K)
(
kcal/mol)] of Species 1, 2, and 3 by DFT, CCSD(T), and
a
CBS-QB3 Methods
level of theory
1
2
3
B3LYP/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*
CCSD(T)/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-31G*
CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ//B3LYP/6-31G*
CBS-QB3
4.9
1.9
13.9
12.2
12.0
5.7
3.7
4.4
3.6
1.3
1.6
-4.0
a
A negative sign denotes a singlet ground state.
red (TRIR) spectroscopy, is consistent with the prediction
of DFT calculations.13 A recent report by Pritchina,
Gritsan, and Bally have examined the chemical prefer-
ences of formylnitrene (HC(dO)N) and hydroxycarbon-
ylnitrene (HOC(dO)N.1
3b
To better understand the differences between acetylni-
trene (CH C(dO)N) and methoxycarbonylnitrene (CH -
3 3
OC(dO)N), we have performed calculations to predict
their ground state multiplicities and reactivity at con-
sistent levels of theory and have attempted to directly
compare alkylcarbonylnitrenes and alkoxycarbonyl-
nitrenes with the use of isodesmic equations. Herein, we
are pleased to report our results. Some of these predic-
tions are tested by Laser Flash Photolysis studies of
benzoylnitrene.
This result is consistent with the interception of both
the singlet and triplet states of an alkoxycarbonylnitrene.
The conclusions deduced from chemical trapping stud-
ies are also consistent with matrix spectroscopic experi-
ments. The triplet ESR spectra of alkoxycarbonylnitrenes
are observed upon low-temperature photolysis of alkoxy-
carbonyl azides,7 confirming that alkoxycarbonylni-
trenes have triplet ground states. However, triplet acylni-
trenes have never been detected by ESR spectroscopy
when acyl azides are irradiated at cryogenic tempera-
tures. Photolysis of benzoyl azide and related azides fails
to produce ESR spectra characteristic of a benzoylnitrene.
Taken together, the chemical trapping studies and matrix
spectroscopic studies indicate that acylnitrenes have
singlet ground states.
,8
Results
Computational Chemistry. A. Singlet-Triplet En-
ergy Splittings. The singlet-triplet energy splitting of
nitrenes 1 and 2 and carbene 3 were computed using
B3LYP, CCSD(T), and CBS-QB3 methodologies. In par-
ticular, the CBS-QB3 method relies on a B3LYP geom-
etry, a CCSD(T) energy as an estimate for electron
correlation, and an extrapolation to the infinite basis set
limit. As such, it is the most accurate method utilized in
this study. The results are given in Table 1.
Imidogen (NH),9 alkyl7,10 and arylnitrenes7,11 have
triplet ground-state multiplicities. Recent density func-
tional theory (DFT) and high level ab initio calculations,
however, indicate that other acylnitrenes have closed-
shell singlet ground states because of a bonding interac-
tion between the oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the
1
2,13
intermediate.
B3LYP and CCSD(T) methods predict that compounds
-3 will all have triplet ground states, as opposed to
1
The position of the carbonyl vibration of singlet ben-
zoylnitrene, observed by matrix and time-resolved infra-
CBS-QB3 theory, which indicates that whereas 2 and 3
have triplet ground-state multiplicities, acetylnitrene 1
is predicted to have a singlet ground state. This conclu-
sion is in agreement with G2 calculations by Faustov et
al. B3LYP predicts the triplet nitrenes to be too stable,
relative to CBS-QB3, by approximately 8-9 kcal/mol. In
the case of the carbene, the discrepancy is only 2.4 kcal/
(
5) Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5814.
6) (a) Lwowski, W.; Mattingly, T. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965,
(
12c
8
5
5
7, 1947. (b) Lwowski, W.; Woerner, F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
491. (c) McConaghy, J. S.; Lwowski, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87,
490.
(
(
7) Wasserman, E. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1971, 8, 319.
8) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
988, 110, 4297.
(11) (a) Hrovat, D. A.; Waali, E. E.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 8698. See also: Castell, O.; Garc ´ı a, V. M.; Bo, C.;
Caballolo, R. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 42-48. (b) Gritsan, N. P.;
Zhu, Z.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1202.
(12) (a) Gritsan, N. P.; Pritchina, E. A. Mendeleev Commun. 2001,
94. (b) Shapley, W. A.; Bacskay, G. B. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103,
6625. (c) Faustov, V. I.; Baskir, E. G.; Biryukov, A. A. Russ. Chem.
Bull. Int. Ed. 2003, 52, 2328.
(13) (a) Pritchina, E. A.; Gritsan, N. P.; Maltsev, A.; Bally, T.; Autrey,
T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Toscano, J. P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5,
1010. (b) Pritchina, E. A.; Gritsan, N. P.; Bally, T. Russ. Chem. Bull.
Int. Ed. 2004, 53, in press.
(
9) (a) Fairchild, P. W.; Smith, G. P.; Crosly, D. R.; Jeffries, J. B.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 107, 181. (b) Engelking, P. C.; Lineberger, W.
C. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 65, 4323.
(
10) (a) Travers, M. J.; Cowles, D. C.; Clifford, E. P.; Ellison, G. B.;
Engelking, P. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1999, 111, 5349. (b) Kemnitz, C. R.;
Ellison, G. B.; Karney, W. L.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
1
1
1
22, 1098. (c) Barash, L.; Wasserman, E.; Jager, W. A. J. Chem. Phys.
967, 89, 3931. For a correction, see: Ferrante, R. F. J. Chem. Phys.
987, 86, 25. (d) Radziszewski, J. G.; Downing, J. W.; Wentrup, C.;
Kaszynski, P.; Jawdosiuk, M.; Kovacic, P.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
985, 107, 2799.
8584 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 25, 2004