C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
fatty-acylated proteins, as labeled proteins can be visualized within
minutes by streptavidin blotting.
acid analogue 1 and analyzed for Lck N-myristoylation by
streptavidin blotting after immunoprecipitation (Figure 2C). The
myristic acid analogue 1 only labeled wild-type Lck and not the
G2A mutant, demonstrating that compound 1 was attached specif-
ically to the N-terminal glycine of Lck. Collectively, these
experiments establish that ω-azido-fatty acids can be efficiently
metabolized by mammalian cells and selectively installed on sites
of fatty acylation on proteins, depending on the chain length of the
ω-azido-fatty acids.
The distinct profiles of protein labeling afforded by ω-azido-
fatty acid 1 compared to 2-4 suggest that these chemical probes
target different sets of fatty-acylated proteins in mammalian cells.
To determine whether the ω-azido-fatty acids selectively target
N-myristoylated or S-palmitoylated proteins, we subjected ω-azido-
2
fatty acid labeled proteins to hydroxylamine (NH OH) treatment,
which selectively removes fatty acids attached to proteins via a
3
thioester linkage. Treatment of ω-azido-fatty acid labeled proteins
New tools are needed to further our understanding of protein
fatty acylation. Here we demonstrate that ω-azido-fatty acids 1 and
3 can be efficiently metabolized by mammalian cells and serve as
selective probes to rapidly visualize N-myristoylation and S-
acylation, respectively. In addition to the more sensitive detection
of fatty-acylated proteins with these chemical probes, the ability
to biotinylate fatty-acylated proteins provides an opportunity for
enrichment and proteomic analysis of lipidated proteins. These
studies are currently underway and will be reported in due course.
The development ω-azido-fatty acids adds to the toolbox of
with NH
ω-azido-fatty acid 1 were resistant to NH
In contrast, proteins visualized with ω-azido-fatty acids 2-4 were
sensitive to NH OH treatment and suggest that the majority of
2
OH demonstrated that the polypeptides visualized with
2
OH cleavage (Figure 2A).
2
ω-azido-fatty acids 2-4 are attached to proteins through a thioester
bond (Figure 2A). Proteins labeled with the 14-carbon ω-azido-
fatty acid 2 were differentially sensitive to NH OH, which suggests
2
that compound 2 may serve as a substrate analogue for both myristic
and palmitic acid (Figure 2A). Co-incubation with myristic acid
selectively decreased protein labeling with ω-azido-fatty acid 1 in
a dose-dependent manner, whereas lauric acid and palmitic acid
had no effect at the same concentration (Supporting Information
Figure 2A and B). Alternatively, protein labeling with ω-azido-
fatty acid 3 was selectively reduced by co-incubation with longer
chain fatty acids, such as palmitic acid or stearic acid and not with
lauric or myristic acid (Supporting Information Figure 2C).
Furthermore, proteins labeled with ω-azido-fatty acid 1 were
sensitive to co-incubation with cycloheximide, whereas proteins
targeted by ω-azido-fatty acid 3 were not (Supporting Information
Figure 2D), consistent with the co-translational addition of myristic
acid to proteins by N-myristoyltransferases6 and the post-
translational modification of palmitoylated proteins by S-palmi-
12
chemical reporters to monitor protein glycosylation and farnesy-
lation.13
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Jannie Borst (Netherlands
Cancer Institute) for the gift of polyclonal anti-Lck sera. H.C.H.
acknowledges the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation for
a postdoctoral fellowship. A.M.P. acknowledges the National
Science Foundation for graduate fellowship. M.J.B. acknowledges
the Medical Research Council for a Career Development Award.
This work was funded by NIH grant to H.L.P. (5RO1A1034893-
13).
Supporting Information Available: Procedures for chemical
synthesis, metabolic labeling, and streptavidin blots. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
7
toyltransferases. Collectively, these results suggest that the ω-azido-
fatty acid 1 selectively targets N-myristoylated proteins, whereas
the longer chain ω-azido-fatty acids 2-4 primarily label S-acylated
proteins.
References
(
1) Resh, M. D. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 584-590.
To further establish fatty-acylated protein labeling with ω-azido-
fatty acids, we analyzed a well-characterized fatty-acylated protein,
Lck, a Src-family protein kinase that is essential for T cell
(2) Resh, M. D. Methods 2006, 40, 191-197.
(
(
3) Drisdel, R. C.; Green, W. N. Biotechniques 2004, 36, 276-285.
4) Roth, A. F.; Wan, J.; Bailey, A. O.; Sun, B.; Kuchar, J. A.; Green, W.
N.; Phinney, B. S.; Yates, J. R., III; Davis, N. G. Cell 2006, 125, 1003-
1013.
8
activation. Human Jurkat T cells were metabolically labeled with
(
5) Saxon, E.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 2000, 287, 2007-2010.
ω-azido-fatty acid 1 or 3, cell lysates were prepared, labeled with
phosphine-biotin, immunoprecipitated for endogenous Lck with
polyclonal anti-Lck sera,9 and analyzed for fatty acylation by
streptavidin blotting (Figure 2B). Lck immunoprecipitated from
Jurkat cell lysates was efficiently labeled with the myristic acid
analogue 1 as well as by the palmitic acid analogue 3, albeit at
much lower levels (Figure 2B). The differences observed between
Lck labeling with compounds 1 and 3 are consistent with N-
myristoylation being a constitutive modification, whereas S-
palmitoylation is often dynamic and substoichiometric. These results
are similar to those observed using radiolabeled fatty acids.10 To
unequivocally demonstrate that the myristic acid analogue 1 labels
the N-terminal glycine residue of Lck and not the side chain of
lysine residues elsewhere in the protein, we analyzed wild-type Lck
and an N-terminal glycine to alanine Lck mutant (G2A), which
blocks N-myristoylation of proteins.11 Human embryonic kidney
(6) Farazi, T. A.; Waksman, G.; Gordon, J. I. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276,
3
9501-39504.
7) Smotrys, J. E.; Linder, M. E. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2004, 73, 559-587.
(8) Kabouridis, P. S.; Magee, A. I.; Ley, S. C. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 4983-
(
4998.
(
9) Taher, T. E.; Smit, L.; Griffioen, A. W.; Schilder-Tol, E. J.; Borst, J.;
Pals, S. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 2863-2867.
(
(
(
10) Bijlmakers, M. J.; Isobe-Nakamura, M.; Ruddock, L. J.; Marsh, M. J.
Cell Biol. 1997, 137, 1029-1040.
11) Paige, L. A.; Nadler, M. J.; Harrison, M. L.; Cassady, J. M.; Geahlen, R.
L. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 8669-8674.
12) (a) Vocadlo, D. J.; Hang, H. C.; Kim, E. J.; Hanover, J. A.; Bertozzi, C.
R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 9116-9121. (b) Hang, H. C.;
Yu, C.; Kato, D. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003,
1
00, 14846-14851. (c) Prescher, J. A.; Dube, D. H.; Bertozzi, C. R.
Nature 2004, 430, 873-877. (d) Dube, D. H; Prescher, J. A.; Quang, C.
N.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 4819-4824.
(e) Rabuka, D.; Hubbard, S. C.; Laughlin, S. T.; Argade, S. P.; Bertozzi,
C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12078-12079. (f) Sawa, M.; Hsu,
T.-L.; Itoh, T.; Sugiyama, M.; Hanson, S. R.; Vogt, P. K.; Wong, C.-H.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 12371-12376.
(
13) Kho, Y.; Kim, S. C.; Jiang, C.; Barma, D.; Kwon, S. W.; Cheng, J.;
Jaunbergs, J.; Weinbaum, C.; Tamanoi, F.; Falck, J.; Zhao, Y. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 12479-12484.
(HEK) 293T cells were transfected with cDNA constructs encoding
wild-type Lck or the G2A mutant Lck, labeled with the myristic
JA0685001
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 10, 2007 2745