W. Li, Q. You / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 3733–3735
3735
uated for their in vitro local anesthetic activity. The
compounds 6a–6e were obtained starting from 4-flu-
oro-2-nitro-toluene. The in vitro local anesthetic activity
was evaluated by sciatic nerve block. Dissociation con-
J = 6.5 Hz, 1-NCH
ArH), 7.18 (2H, m, ArH). Compound 6c: (CD
2
), 6.76 (2H, m, ArH), 6.99 (2H, m,
3
OD) d 2.02
0
0
(
CH
2H, m, 2-CH ), 2.06 (2H, m, 2 -CH ), 2.15 (2H, m, 3 -
2
2
0
2
), 3.16 (2H, m, 4 -CH
2
N), 3.28 (4H, m, ArCH
0
2
–), 3.35
), 3.86 (2H, t,
(2H, m, 3-CH
J = 7 Hz, 1-NCH
2
N), 3.36 (2H, m, 1 -NCH
2
stants (pK ) of these compounds have been determined
a
2
), 6.76 (2H, m, ArH), 6.97 (2H, m,
to be 7.6–7.9. These compounds have different degrees
of local anesthetic action. Compound 6b was found to
have potency, onset, and duration of action comparable
to those of lidocaine. The new compound 6b may de-
serve further evaluation as potential local anesthetic.
ArH), 7.16 (2H, m, ArH). Compound 6d: (CD OD) d 1.22
3
0
0
0
(
2H, m, 3 -CH
CH ), 2.07 (2H, m, 2-CH
2
), 1.77 (2H, m, 2 -CH
2
), 1.91 (2H, m, 4 -
0
2
2
), 2.90 (2H, m, 5 -CH
2
N), 3.10
0
(2H, m, 1 -CH N), 3.18 (4H, m, ArCH –), 3.35 (2H, m, 3-
2
2
CH N), 3.86 (2H, t, J = 7 Hz, 1-NCH ), 6.76 (2H, m,
2
2
ArH), 6.97 (2H, m, ArH), 7.16 (2H, m, ArH). Compound
e: (CD OD) d 2.00 (2H, m, 2-CH ), 3.05 (6H, m, 3-
CH N, 1 -NCH , 5 -CH N), 3.18 (4H, m, ArCH ), 3.65
6
3
2
0
0
Acknowledgments
2
2
2
2
0
(
2H, m, 2 -CH
0
2
O–), 3.80 (2H, t, J = 7 Hz, 1-NCH
2
), 3.97
(
ArH), 7.10 (2H, m, ArH).
2H, m, 4 -CH
2
O–), 6.70 (2H, m, ArH), 6.90 (2H, m,
This work was supported by a grant from Jiangsu Hen-
grui Pharmaceutical Com. Ltd. The authors are grateful
to Dr. J. H. Fu (Pharmaceutical School, China Pharma-
ceutical University) for the determination of biological
activity.
1
1
1
1. Thiele, J.; Holzinger, O. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1899, 305, 96.
2. Kricka, L. J.; Ledwith, A. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 102.
3. Horowska, B.; Ledochowasky, A. Pol. J. Chem. 1981, 55,
39.
1
1
1
1
4. Smith, K.; James, D. M.; Mistry, A. G. Tetrahedron 1992,
4
8, 7479.
5. Kricka, L. J.; Ledwith, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
973, 859.
References and notes
1
6. Jorgensen, T. K.; Andersen, K. E.; Lau, J. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1999, 36, 57.
7. Christian, F.; Elke, K.; Steffi, L. Arzneimittelforschung
1
2
3
. Chen, Y. W.; Huang, K. L.; Liu, S. Y. Pain 2004, 112, 106.
. Brau, M. E.; Dreimann, M. Anesthesiology 2001, 94, 137.
. Pancrazio, J. J.; Kamatchi, G. L.; Roscoe, A. K. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 284, 208.
. Ogata, N.; Narahasshi, T. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1989, 97, 905.
. Khan, M. A.; Gerner, P.; Wang, G. K. Anesthesiology
2
. Wang, G. K.; Gerner, P. WO0226020, 2002.
. Sudoh, Y.; Cahooh, Y.; Cahoon, E. E. Pain 2003, 103, 49.
. Kyburz, E.; Spiegelberg, H. US 3927128, 1975.
2
003, 53, 221.
1
1
8. Hertog, D. Eur. J. Pharmamol. 1974, 26, 175.
9. Salako, L. A.; Vaughan, W. E. M.; Wittig, J. H. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 1976, 57, 251.
4
5
002, 96, 109.
2
2
0. Lee-Son, S.; Wang, H. K.; Concus, A. Anesthesiology
1
6
7
8
9
992, 77, 324.
1. The regress equation of AP decreasing extent (%) and
compound concentration was y = blogx + a (y: AP
decreasing extent (%); x: drug concentration; a, b: regress
coefficient). The regress equation of latent period and
compound concentration was y = blogx + a (y: latent
period; x:drug concentration; a and b: regress coefficient).
The ED50 and latent time were calculated by these
equations.
. Compound 6a: (CD
0
3
OD) d 2.02 (2H, m, 2-CH
2
), 2.82 (6H,
s, 1 -NCH
CH N), 3.82 (2H, t, J = 7 Hz, 1-NCH ), 6.72 (2H, m,
3
), 3.18 (4H, m, ArCH
2
–), 3.32 (2H, m, 3-
2
2
ArH), 6.94 (2H, m, ArH), 7.13 (2H, m, ArH).
0
1
3
0. Compound 6b: (CD OD) d 1.22 (6H, t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 -
0
CH ), 2.03 (2H, m, 2-CH ), 3.14 (4H, m, 1 -NCH ), 3.18
3
2
2
(
4H, m, ArCH
2
–), 3.32 (2H, m, 3-CH
2
N), 3.88 (2H, t,