Mendeleev Commun., 2015, 25, 44–46
O(1)
the 2-position of DLG via addition of the corresponding Gringard
reagents.‡ The presence of the 1,6-anhydro bridge provides high
stereoselectivity.6,8(b) Noteworthy, addition of MeMgI to DLG is
less stereoselective.11 The major isomers of target alcohols 1a
(92.9% in mixture) and 2a (91.7%) were easily separated by
column chromatography. The ethenyl and ethynyl substitutents in
such molecules can be transformed to various heterocyclic rings
via 3+2 dipolar cycloaddition reactions.12,§ We demonstrated such
transformation yielding isoxazoles 3–6 and 1,2,3-triazoles 7 with
1,5-anhydrohexitol moieties. 3-Acetylisoxazole 6 was synthesized
from alkyne 1a and acetone using ammonium cerium(iv) nitrate
in one-pot procedure13 (see Scheme 1).
O(2)
C(6)
O(3)
C(8)
C(7)
C(1)
C(2)
C(5)
C(3)
C(4)
Figure 2 Molecular structure of 1,6-anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-ethynyl-
b-d-threo-hexopyranose 1a.
N(1)
O(4)
Interesting biological properties have been reported for
1,2,3-triazole–carbohydrate conjugates.14 Isoxazoles and 4,5-di-
hydroisoxazoles are considered as useful intermediates in organic
synthesis.15 Furanose- and pyranose-containing C-nucleosides
with isoxazole group were reported previously.16 The opening
of 1,6-anhydrohexitol acetal ring, described earlier,6 can be used
for transformation of derivatives 3–7 into type B C-nucleosides.
The molecular structures of 1a and 3 and stereoselectivity were
unambiguously determined by X-ray crystal diffraction study
(Figures 2 and 3).¶
O(1)
C(15)
C(9)
C(10)
C(6)
O(3)
O(2)
C(14)
C(7)
C(1)
C(2)
C(8)
C(11)
C(13)
C(5)
C(12)
C(4)
C(3)
Figure 3 Molecular structure of 1,6-anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-(3-phenyl-
isoxazol-5-yl)-b-d-threo-hexopyranose 3.
In conclusion, we have developed the simple synthesis of C2
chiral derivatives of dihydrolevoglucosenone 1a, 2a and 3–7
as precursors for preparation of methylene-expanded C-nucleo-
sides (B).
EtOAc solution was evaporated. Residue was distilled to afford DLG,
30.2 g (85%), bp 52°C/2 Torr (lit.,17 104°C/16 Torr), [a]D20 –261.8 (c 1.0,
CHCl3) {lit.,17 [a]D25 –246 (CHCl3)}.
‡
1,6-Anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-ethynyl-b-d-hexopyranose 1a. Purified
anhydrous THF (100 ml) was placed in a 50 ml flask, acetylene was
introduced through a gas-inlet tube at the rate of 0.5–1.0 dm3 h–1, and
the stirrer was started. After 15 min, ethylmagnesium bromide (prepared
from 0.48 g, 0.02 g-atom of magnesium turnings, and 2.4 g, 0.022 mol of
bromoethane in the 25 ml of THF) was added over 2 h. The temperature
was raised to 5–10°C. The mixture was stirred at 30–35°C for 1 h, then
cooled in an ice bath and DLG (3.1 g, 0.024 mol) in tetrahydrofuran
(15 ml) was added over 15 min. The mixture was then stirred and heated
to 40–45 °C for a further 2 h, cooled and saturated aqueous NH4Cl was
added carefully to dissolve the solid components. The two layers were
separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (3×15 ml). The
combined organic fractions were dried (K2CO3) and solvent was evaporated
in vacuo. The crude product (2.3 g) was purified by chromatography on
silica gel to afford 1a (1.95 g, 63%) and 1b (0.15 g, 5%) as white crystals.
1,6-Anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-ethenyl-b-d-hexopyranose 1b. A solution
of ethenylmagnesium bromide (prepared from 0.48 g, 0.02 g-atom of
magnesium turnings, and 2.4 g, 0.022 mol of bromoethene) in dry THF
(100 ml) was cooled to 5°C. Solution of DLG (3.12 g, 0.02 mol) in THF
(15 ml) was added. After stirring for 2 h at room temperature, the reaction
was cooled to 0°C and quenched with saturated NH4Cl. The organic layer
was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether
(3×20 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered
and concentrated in vacuo to afford a mixture of 2a and 2b. The crude
product was purified by flash chromatography to yield 2a (1.3 g, 42%)
and 2b (0.12 g, 4%) as white solid products.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2015.01.016.
References
1 (a) G. Romeo, U. Chiacchio, A. Corsaro and P. Merino, Chem. Rev., 2010,
110, 3337; (b) J. S. Barradas, M. I. Errea, N. B. D’Accorso, C. S. Sepulveda,
L. B. Talarico and E. B. Damonte, Carbohydr. Res., 2008, 343, 2468.
2 D. Cai, K. Lin, M. Song and T. You, Synth. Commun., 2004, 34, 159.
3 (a) P. C. Srivastava, M. V. Pickering, L. B. Allen, D. G. Streeter, M. T.
Campbell, J. T. Witkowski, R. W. Sidwell and R. K. Robins, J. Med.
Chem., 1977, 20, 256; (b) P. C. Srivastava and R. K. Robins, J. Med. Chem.,
1983, 26, 445.
4 (a) H. Pedersen, E. B. Pedersen and C. M. Nielsen, Heterocycles, 1992,
34, 265; (b) Y. Maurinsh, J. Schraml, H. De Winter, N. Blaton, O. Peeters,
E. Lescrinier, J. Rozenski, A. Van Aerschot, E. De Clercq and R. Busson,
J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2861; (c) M. J. Perez-Perez, J. Rozenski,
R. Busson and P. Herdewijn, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 1531; (d) G. Cadet,
C. S. Chan, R. Y. Daniel, C. P. Davis, D. Guiadeen, G. Rodriguez, T. Thomas,
S. Walcott and P. Scheiner, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4574.
5 I. Verheggen, A. Van Aerschot, S. Toppet, R. Snoeck, G. Janssen, J. Balzarini,
E. De Clercq and P. Herdewijn, J. Med. Chem., 1993, 36, 2033.
¶
Crystallographic data were collected on an Enraf-Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer using MoKa radiation, w/2q scan mode. Structures were
solved by full-matrix least-squares method.
§
1,6-Anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-(3-phenylisoxazol-5-yl)-b-d-threo-hexo-
pyranose 3 (typical procedure). Compound 1a (0.31 g, 0.002 mol) was
dissolved in Et2O (10 ml). PhCCl=NOH (0.47 g, 0.003 mol) in Et2O
(10 ml) was added at –40°C. Et3N (0.6 g, 0.006 mol) was added dropwise
over 2 h. Stirring was continued at –40°C until the reaction was complete
according to TLC (2–3 h) and 2 h at room temperature. The mixture was
quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (10 ml), extracted with diethyl
ether and dried with Na2SO4. After evaporation of the solvent resulting
oil was purified by flash chromatography to give 3 as a white solid, yield
0.37 g (67%).
1,6-Anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-2-C-(1-benzyl-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)-b-d-threo-
hexopyranose 7. A mixture of 1a (0.162 g, 0.00105 mol), benzyl azide
(0.133 g, 0.001 mol), and Cu(OAc)2·H2O (36 mg, 0.2 mmol) in water
(5 ml) was vigorously stirred for 1 h and extracted with EtOAc (2×5 ml).
The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was crysrallized from
benzene to yield 7 (241 mg, 84%) as a white solid.
For 1a: crystals of C8H10O3 (M = 154.16) are orthorombic, space group
P212121, at 293 K: a = 6.623(1), b = 9.427(2) and c = 12.076(2) Å, V =
= 754.0(3) Å3, Z = 4, dcalc = 1.358 g cm–3. 1061 reflections were collected,
from which 1395 unique (Rint = 0.0209), F(000) = 328. Refinement
converged to R1 = 0.0386, wR2 = 0.0848 (all data) and R1 = 0.0308,
wR2 = 0.0827 [I > 2s(I)], GOF = 1.103.
For 3: crystals of C15H15NO4 (M = 273.28) are hexagonal, space group
P31, at 293 K: a = 9.809(1), b = 9.809(1) and c = 11.856(2) Å, g = 120°,
V = 987.9(3) Å3, Z = 3, dcalc = 1.378 g cm–3. 2045 reflections were col-
lected, from which 1288 unique (Rint = 0.0197), F(000) = 432. Refinement
converged to R1 = 0.0331, wR2 = 0.0612 (all data) and R1 = 0.0224,
wR2 = 0.0594 [I > 2s(I)], GOF = 1.033.
CCDC 961718 and 961719 contain the supplementary crystallographic data
forthispaper.ThesedatacanbeobtainedfreeofchargefromTheCambridge
For more synthetic details and characteristics of compounds 1–7, see
Online Supplementary Materials.
– 45 –