192
A. Babai et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 192 (2014) 191–198
solute–solvent interactions, excluding such interactions leading to defi-
nite chemical alterations of the ions or molecules of the solute” [6].
According to Reichardt solvent–solute interactions can be divided
into specific and non-specific interactions [7]. Non-specific interactions
are instantaneous/induced dipole forces (dispersion or London forces),
dipole/induced-dipole forces (induction or Debye forces), dipole/dipole
forces (orientation or Keesom forces) and ion/dipole forces (Coulomb
forces) which might quite well get addressed through measurements
of continuum properties such as dielectric constants. Specific interac-
tions include hydrogen bond donor and/or hydrogen bond acceptor in-
teractions, electron pair donor/electron pair acceptor or charge–transfer
interactions, solvophobic interactions (which can become important
only in highly structured solvents). As ionic liquids contain, in contrast
to conventional molecular solvents, charged ions it is expected that
electron–donor–acceptor interactions have a rather high influence. In
consequence, an important property of ionic liquids as solvents is
their Lewis acidity and basicity or, in other words, their electron accep-
tor and donor capability. It is anticipated that the electron acceptor
properties of an IL depend largely on the cation whereas the IL anion
governs the IL electron donor properties.
Methylimidazole (98%), N-methylpyrrolidine (98%), the respective hal-
ogen alkanes (N98%) were purchased from Acros, Geel, B and distilled
prior to use.
2.2. General purification procedure for ILs
The respective IL was diluted with CH2Cl2 or CHCl3 and washed sev-
eral times with deionized water to remove any excess of halides or alkali
metal salts (AgNO3 test) as well as unreacted starting material. After
filtration of the solution over a column with neutral Al2O3 and active
charcoal the solvent was removed under high vacuum and the ILs
dried under dynamic vacuum for 1–2 days at 80–90 °C.
2.3. Synthesis of HTf2N
HTf2N was obtained by sublimation at 70 °C from a solution of LiTf2N
in concentrated sulfuric acid under reduced pressure (10−3 mbar). The
crude product was resublimed for further purification. Yield: 90%.
1H−NMRðD2OÞ : δðppmÞ ¼ 4:77ðs; 1HÞ
We could confirm this hypothesis through evaluation of spectro-
scopic properties of certain transition metal compounds in different
ionic liquids. They made it possible to separate the anionic influ-
ence, hence Lewis basicity. We were able to rank various IL anions
with respect to their Lewis basicity by evaluating the absorption
spectra of the indicator complex (Ni(tmen)(acac)][B(Ph)4] (tmen =
tetramethylethylendiamine, acac = acetylacetonate) [8]. In a second
step we transferred Duffy's concept of the optical basicity [9] to ILs by
using Mn(Tf2N)2 as a spectroscopic probe [10].
19 F−NMRðD2OÞ : δðppmÞ ¼ −79:16ðs; 6FÞ
n
o
13C 19 F −NMRðD2OÞ : δðppmÞ ¼ 19:27ðs; 2CÞ
When investigating in a different context the solvation and li-
gand exchange processes of ytterbium(III) salts in ionic liquids
such as (C4mpyr)(Tf2N) (C4mpyr = N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium)
or (C4mpyr)(TfO) we made an interesting observation: We found that
the Yb2+/Yb3+ redox potential strongly depends on the local chemical
environment and coordination of Yb3+ by the IL anion. It was found that
the more coordinating the IL anion is, the less negative the redox
potentials (vs. Fc/Fc+) [11]. Thus, it also should be possible to elec-
trochemically determine the Lewis basicity of an IL with a given
anion by investigating the redox potential of a dissolved lanthanide
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide, Ln(Tf2N)3. An additional ad-
vantage of using lanthanide salts as a probe is, that many of the tri-
valent lanthanides show distinct photoluminescence. As Yb3+ is
spectroscopically inactive in the visible range of the electromagnetic
spectrum, we choose for this study Eu3+ which is commonly used as
a structural probe. To date several Eu3+ containing ionic liquids and
liquid crystals are known [12]. In case of Eu3+ it is possible to monitor
the electron donation power of the anion via the shift of (hyper-) sensi-
tive transitions in the luminescence spectra. Thus, by using the same
probe, Eu(Tf2N)3, but different analytical tools, namely cyclic voltamm-
etry and luminescence spectroscopy, it should be possible to access the
electron donor power of an IL anion. To check whether Eu(Tf2N)3 can
work as both, an optical and electrochemical probe for the anion
Lewis basicity we have investigated solutions of Eu(Tf2N)3 in a set of
ionic liquids with anions of weak (e.g. Tf2N−), middle (e.g. TfO−) and
strong (e.g. DCA−) Lewis basicity and recorded the respective lumines-
cence spectra and cyclic voltammograms.
2.4. Synthesis of Eu(Tf2N)3
Eu2O3 was suspended in deionized water and five-fold molar excess
of an aqueous HTf2N solution was added dropwise. After complete dis-
solution of Eu2O3 the water was boiled off until a slurry solid appeared.
This slurry was transferred to a Schlenk tube and dried at 140–160 °C
under high vacuum. The residual solid was sublimed for purification
under reduced pressure at 270 °C.
Elemental analysis : EuðTf2NÞ3
calc:N 4:23%:C 7:26%; H 0:00%; S 19:39 %
found N 4:19%:C 7:25%; H 0:10%; S 20:34%
2.5. Synthesis of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bromides
(CnmimBr) bromides (n = 2, 3, 4 and 6) were obtained by alkylation
of 1-methylimidazole with the respective halogen alkane [13]. All bro-
mides except C6mimBr, which is liquid, were obtained as crystalline
white powders.
ðC2mimÞBr:1H−NMR ðCDCl3Þ : δ ðppmÞ
¼ 1:23 ðt; 3H; J ¼ 7:4 HzÞ; 3:75 ðs; 3HÞ; 4:06 ðq; 2H; J ¼ 7:2 HzÞ;
7:39 ðs; 2HÞ; 9:82 ðs; 1HÞ
2. Experimental section
2.1. Chemicals and synthesis
LiTfO (98%), Eu(TfO)3 (98%) and Eu2O3 (99.9%) were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, D. LiTf2N, (N4441)(Tf2N), (C2mim)(MeSO3),
(C2mim)(TfO) and (C4pyr)(Tf2N) (all 99%) were purchased from
IoLiTec, Heilbronn, D. (P666 14)Cl (95%) was provided by Cytec, Stamford,
USA. All commercial ILs were purified prior to the experiments.
ðC3mimÞBr:1H−NMR ðCDCl3Þ : δ ðppmÞ
¼ 0:44 ðt; 3H; J ¼ 7:4 HzÞ; 1:45 ðhex; 2H; J ¼ 7:2 HzÞ; 3:61 ðs; 3HÞ;
3:82 ðt; 2H; J ¼ 7:2 HzÞ; 7:82 ðd; 2H; J ¼ 1:7 HzÞ; 9:67 ðs; 1HÞ