C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
warmed to 180 K and recooled to 77 K. The new spectrum was
identical to that of the stable E,E (see insert in Figure 2b). Thus,
the primary photoproduct must be a high-energy conformer of E,E-2
(E,E′′-2). The presence of the o,o′-substituents that removed
symmetry in the phenyl ring made possible detection of the
associated single-bond isomerization along with the double-bond
isomerization as expected of a HT process.
Another minor difference between results of Z,E-2 and Z,E-1 is
the slightly diffused isosbestic point for the methylated case, which
appeared to be independent of the wavelength of excitation (>300
nm, Pyrex filter, or >325 nm, naphthalene solution filter). Analysis
of the absorption spectrum showed the presence of the stable E,E-2
as a minor product at all stages of irradiation (increasing slightly
with time). Its formation is not consistent with HT-2 of Z,E-2
(yielding instead E,E′-2) but is consistent with HT-1 of the unstable
conformer Z,E-2 present in equilibrium concentration at the setting
temperature of the organic glass (∼90 K).
Figure 3. Difference spectra obtained from direct irradiation of Z,Z-1 in
EPA glass at 77 K. (a) Early period of irradiation (2-50 s). Insert:
absorption spectrum of authentic Z,E-1 (solid line) superimposed with that
of the absorption spectrum at 50 s of irradiation minus the residual amount
of Z,Z-1 (42%) and 1.8% E,E-1 (dotted line). (b) Later period of irradiation
(110-1270 s). Insert: absorption of authentic E,E-1 (solid line) superim-
posed with the absorption spectrum at t ) 1270 s of irradiation minus 62%
Z,E-1 (dotted line).
While it is premature to suggest a primary cause for the observed
regioselectivity in HT of DPB, we suspect there are two contributing
factors favoring HT-1 over HT-2. The first is the possible favorable
energy of the allyl-phenyl transition state structure for the HT-1
process (versus the vinyl-phenyl structure for HT-2). The second
is the smaller phenyl end group in its sideways sliding movement
as part of the HT-1 process (relative to the larger benzyl group for
HT-2).
We have also examined the low-temperature photochemical
behavior of Z,Z-1. The difference spectra corresponding to those
of the early (Figure 3a) and later (Figure 3b) periods of irradiation
are shown separately. The semilog plot (not shown) clearly showed
two distinct steps of reaction giving an early product without any
fine structures and a later product with fine structures in the
absorption spectra. After subtracting contributions of reactants to
the spectra of the irradiated sample, we readily concluded that the
initial product was that of the stable Z,E isomer and the later product
was that of the stable E,E isomer (see inserts), which is identical
to the insert in Figure 1b. Therefore, the photoreaction must be
consecutive HT-1 and HT-1′ processes (see scheme for Z,Z above).
Again, HT-2 or HT-2′ would lead to new unstable conformers.
Additionally, we have examined the low-temperature photo-
chemical behavior of isomers of p,p′- and o,o′-bistrifluoromethyl-
DPB (3 and 4).7 In the case of 3, photoreactions were similar to
those of the parent isomers; in the case of 4, photoreactions were
similar to those of 2. Figures corresponding to those of Figures
1-3 are available in Supporting Information. Hence, the observed
high preference for isomerization at CH-1 was unaffected by
variation of electronic properties of the substituents on the phenyl
rings.
Acknowledgment. The work was supported by grants from
Hawaii NSF-EPSCoR (CHE-01-32250) and Kentucky NSF-EPS-
CoR (4-65752-03-397).
Supporting Information Available: NMR data of isomers of 1-4
and difference absorption spectra of 3 and 4 from direct irradiation
(PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Zechmeister, L. Cis-trans Isomeric Carotenoids, Vitamin A, and Arylpoly-
enes; Academic Press: New York, 1962; pp 163-168.
(2) Yee, W. A.; Hug, S. J.; Kliger, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2164-
2169.
(3) Liu, R. S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 555-562.
(4) Krishnamoorthy, G.; Asato, A. E.; Liu, R. S. H. Chem. Commun. 2003,
2170-2171.
(5) Krishnamoorthy, G.; Schieffer, S.; Shevyakov, S.; Asato, A. E.; Wong,
K.; Head, J.; Liu, R. S. H. Res. Chem. Interm. 2004, 30, 397-405.
(6) Imamoto, Y.; Kuroda, T.; Kataoka, M.; Shevyakov, S.; Krishnamoorthy,
G.; Liu, R. S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3630-3633.
(7) Isomers of 1 were prepared according to published procedures.1,2 Similar
procedures were followed for preparation of isomers of 2-4. Characteriza-
tion data (NMR and UV) of the latter compounds are available in
Supporting Information.
JA043193P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 8, 2005 2405