A R T I C L E S
Kaloudis et al.
8
-Amino-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-NH
2
-dGuo) and 8-aminogua-
-Guo, 2) are produced together with the corre-
important intermediate for which spectroscopic and kinetic
information is very scarce.
2
6
nosine (8-NH
2
sponding 8-oxo-guanine derivative, in rat liver treated with
-nitropropane (2-NP), a hepatocarcinogen widely used as an
industrial solvent, a component of coatings, and also found in
2
13a
cigarette smoke. This has been shown to result from amination
of DNA or RNA, respectively, by a metabolite of 2-NP,
hydroxylamine-O-sulfonate, capable of releasing a reactive
+
13b
nitrenium ion (NH
2
). Metal-mediated DNA damage caused
Herein we report detailed chemical radiation studies of com-
pounds 1 and 2 in aqueous solution. In particular, we have
investigated their one-electron oxidation and one-electron reduction
reactions and clarified the major tautomeric forms of the various
intermediates by the combined use of pulse radiolysis and DFT
calculations. In addition, continuous radiolysis coupled with product
studies allowed a better understanding of the fate of the transients.
14
by 2-NP metabolites may also play a role. This is a mutagenic
lesion that has been found to generate GfT and GfC
15
transversions in mammalian cells and to be weakly mutagenic
-
3
16
(
mutation frequency, 10 ) in Escherichia coli. To extenuate
the difference between 1 and 2, it was found that 8-NH -dGTP
is incorporated and extended more efficiently than 8-oxo-dGTP
by both HIV type I and murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptases and by DNA polymerases R and ꢀ. The
analogous one-electron oxidation of 8-aminoguanine derivatives
2
Results and Discussion
1
7
Protonated One-Electron Reduced 8-Oxo-dGuo (1) and
-
8
-NH
2
-Guo (2) Species. Radiolysis of neutral water leads to eaq
,
2
has not received any attention. The 8-NH -G moiety is also of
particular interest, since it can be considered as a model
•
•
HO , and H as shown in eq 2. The values in parentheses represent
the radiation chemical yields (G) in units of µmol J . The reactions
of eaq with the substrates were studied in O -free solutions
-1
compound of protein-DNA cross-links with the C8 position
-
1
8,19
20
21
of the guanine moiety.
NMR studies and calculations
2
containing 0.25 M t-BuOH. Based on the available kinetic data,
suggest that the amino form 2b rather than the imino 2a form
is the most stable tautomer in aqueous solutions, contrary to
•
we expected that HO is scavenged efficiently (eq 3, k
3
) 6.0 ×
27,28
8
-1 -1
•
1
0 M s ), whereas H is trapped only partially (eq 4, k
10 M s ) under the utilized concentrations of t-BuOH.
4
) 1.7
8
-oxo-G (Scheme 1).
5
-1 -1
×
Another interesting aspect related to 8-oxo-dGuo is the one-
electron reduction process. Up to now this reaction has not
-
•
•
H O ' e (0.27), HO (0.28), H (0.062)
(2)
(3)
(4)
2
aq
received any attention. Nucleosides react with hydrated electrons
-
(
e
aq ) at practically diffusion-controlled rates to give radical
•
•
2
HO + t-BuOH f (CH ) C(OH)CH + H O
3
2
2
anions. Radical anions of purine nucleosides, in particular, are
rapidly protonated by water preferably at the C8 position, since
•
•
2
2
2
H + t-BuOH f (CH ) C(OH)CH + H
3
2
2
the corresponding pK
a
values are very high. For example, it
has been recently reported that the guanine radical anion is
The pseudo-first-order rate constants, kobs, for the reaction of
2
3
protonated at C8. 8-Bromoguanine derivatives are also pro-
tonated at C8 affording the corresponding one-electron oxidized
-
e
aq with 8-oxo-dGuo (1) and 8-NH
2
-Guo (2) were determined
-
by measuring the rate of the optical density decrease of eaq at
2
4,25
guanine.
If an analogous reaction applies to 1, it can be
4
-1
-1 29
7
20 nm (ε ) 1.9 × 10 M cm ) at pH ∼7. From the slope
•
expected to generate the HO radical adduct 3 (Reaction 1), an
of kobs vs nucleoside concentration, the bimolecular rate
9
-1 -1
9
-1 -1
constants (k) of 5.6 × 10 M
s
for 1 and 4.4 × 10 M
s
(
(
(
12) In schemes and figures, R ) 2-deoxyribosyl for 8-oxo-G and R )
ribosyl for 8-NH -G and 8-N -G. In the theoretical part (all tables) R
2-deoxyribosyl.
for 2 are obtained. The optical absorption spectrum recorded at
-
2
3
2
µs after the pulse from the reaction of 1 (1.0 mM) with eaq
)
at natural pH (pH 7.2) is presented in Figure 1 (red circles) in
13) (a) Fiala, E. S.; Nie, G.; Sodum, R.; Conaway, C. C.; Sohn, O. S.
Cancer Lett. 1993, 74, 9–14. (b) Sodum, R. S.; Nie, G.; Fiala, E. S.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1993, 6, 269–276.
the range 300-700 nm and shows a broad band that decreases
at longer wavelengths. The time profile of the formation of this
14) Sakano, K.; Oikawa, S.; Murata, M.; Hiraku, Y.; Kojima, N.;
Kawanishi, S. Mutat. Res., Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2001, 479,
-
transient absorbance is identical to the disappearance of eaq
,
denoting a single process. The transient species decays with
1
01–111.
5
-1
(
(
(
(
(
(
15) Tan, X.; Suzuki, N.; Johnson, F.; Grollman, A. P.; Shibutani, S. Nucleic
second-order kinetics, k/ε330 nm ) 8.2 × 10 cm s (right inset).
Acids Res. 1999, 27, 2310–2314.
The optical absorption spectrum recorded at 2 µs after the pulse
16) Venkatarangan, L.; Sivaprasad, A.; Johnson, F.; Basu, A. K. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2001, 29, 1458–1463.
-
from the reaction of 2 (1.0 mM) with eaq at natural pH (pH
17) Kamath-Loeb, A. S.; Hizi, A.; Kasai, H.; Loeb, L. A. J. Biol. Chem.
8.1) is also presented in Figure 1 (blue triangles). The spectrum
1
997, 272, 5892–5898.
of this transient species is more intense than that obtained by
18) Perrier, S.; Hau, J.; Gasparutto, D.; Cadet, J.; Favier, A.; Ravanat,
J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5703–5710.
-
the reaction of 1 with eaq , although its shape is only slightly
different. This transient species decays with second-order
19) Xu, X.; Muller, J. G.; Ye, Y.; Burrows, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
5
-1
1
30, 703–709.
kinetics, k/ε370 nm ) 1.8 × 10 cm s (left inset), with a non-
20) Guengerich, F. P.; Mundkowski, R. G.; Voehler, M.; Kadlubar, F. F.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1999, 12, 906–916.
negligible plateau.
(
(
(
21) Cysewski, P. Z. Phys. Chem. 2005, 219, 213–234.
22) Steenken, S. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 503–520.
(26) Chatgilialoglu, C.; D’Angelantonio, M.; Guerra, M.; Kaloudis, P.;
Mulazzani, Q. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2214–2217.
(27) Buxton, G. V; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. J. Phys.
Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886.
23) D’Angelantonio, M.; Russo, M.; Kaloudis, P.; Mulazzani, Q. G.;
Wardman, P.; Guerra, M.; Chatgilialoglu, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009,
1
13, 2170–2176.
(
24) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Caminal, C.; Guerra, M.; Mulazzani, Q. G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6030–6032.
(28) Ross, A. B., Mallard, W. G.; Helman, W. P.; Buxton, G. V.; Huie,
R. E.; Neta, P. NDRLNIST Solution Kinetic Database - Ver. 3, Notre
Dame Radiation Laboratory, Notre Dame, IN and NIST Standard
Reference Data, Gaithersburg, MD (1998).
(
25) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Caminal, C.; Altieri, A.; Mulazzani, Q. G.;
Vougioukalakis, G. C.; Gimisis, T.; Guerra, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
006, 128, 13796–13805.
(29) Hug, G. L. Nat. Stand. Ref. Data Ser., Nat. Bur. Stand. 1981, 69, 6.
1
5896 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 131, NO. 43, 2009