The use of anhydrous solvent and the amount of scandium
triflate were found to be crucial in order to achieve the yields
that are summarized in Table 2. Scandium triflate was used
in proportions of 1.2 equiv relative to imine 2 for the
synthesis of tetrahydroquinolines from substituted 1,4-
benzodithiafulvenes 1c-e. For the highly reactive 1,4-
benzodithiafulvene 1f, 0.2 equiv of scandium triflate was
used. The use of other Lewis acids such as boron trifluoride
diethyl etherate and trifluoroacetic acid was unsuccessful in
terms of effecting this transformation, which is consistent
with previous observations.2d
Figure 1. Resonance structures of 1,4-benzodithiafulvenes.
dithiafulvenes 1c-f and imines 2a-d as described in Table
2. The basic protocol for the transformation involved the
As summarized in Table 2, the readily prepared 1,4-
benzodithiafulvenes 1c-e7 were reacted with preformed or
in situ-generated N-phenylimines 2a-d to give the tetrahy-
droquinolines 3c-g with combinations of aliphatic or
aromatic substituents at both 2- and 3-positions. This
methodology could also be applied to the synthesis of
systems lacking the 3-substituent as exemplified by 3h and
3i by using the in situ-generated 1f. From the results in Table
2, it appears that the anti/syn stereoselectivity depends on
the steric demands of the two substituents R and R′. High
preference for anti isomers12 was observed for examples 3c,
3e, and 3g where both R and R′ were relatively bulky, while
there was little or no discrimination in relative stereochem-
istry for 3d and 3f for the less hindered iso-butyl group at
the 2-position.
Table 2. Cycloaddition Reactions of 1,4-Benzodithiafulvenes
1c-f with N-Phenylimines 2a-d
The true versatility of this method lies in the opportunity
to chemically manipulate the dithioacetal moiety within the
tetrahydroquinolines 3 (Scheme 2). Reduction of dithioacetals
3c and 3g with NiCl2/NaBH413 afforded the 2,3-disubstituted
1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 4a and 4b. These compounds
have a substitution pattern that is formally opposite to those
obtained if styrene or 3-methyl-1-butene were used as
dienophiles in the cyclization.5 Hydrolysis of the ketene
dithioacetal group, as illustrated for example 3e, occurred
readily at room temperature with mercuric oxide in tetrafluoro-
boric acid ether solution14 to yield the corresponding 2,3-
dihydro-4-quinolone 5. When the reaction was carried out
at 60 °C overnight, the oxidized 4-quinolone 6 was isolated.
The successful conversion of dithioacetal 3e to either 2,3-
dihydro-4-quinolone 5 or 4-quinolone 6 demonstrates a more
concise and mild alternative to the existing methods of
synthesis of these classes of compounds.15,16
product
protocol
yield
reaction time
anti/syn
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
A
B
A
B
A
C
D
81%
64%
82%
66%
38%
92%
64%
180 min
60 min
75 min
60 min
240 min
15 min
15 min
23/1
2/1
28/1
1/1
100/0
reaction of 1,4-benzodithiafulvene with Schiff base in
acetonitrile in the presence of scandium triflate at 64 °C (see
protocol A in Supporting Information). Alternative protocols
were developed where either the imine (protocol B) or 1,4-
benzodithiafulvene (protocol C) could not be isolated. In
these cases, the respective intermediate was generated in situ.
For the 1,4-benzodithiafulvene 1f, the reactivity of this
reagent was such that the tetrahydroquinoline formation was
performed at room temperature. A complementary protocol
(protocol D) was also established for the in situ generation
of both intermediates where neither reagent was stable. In
this way, a highly convergent approach was realized that
covered combinations of various substituents at both 2- and
3-positions.
In summary, we have successfully demonstrated the aza-
Diels-Alder reaction between N-arylimines and ketene
(12) Structure assignments were based on NOE experiments and coupling
constants.
(13) Back, T. G.; Baron, D. L.; Yang, K. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2407-
2413.
(14) Degani, I.; Fochi, R.; Regondi, V. Synthesis 1981, 51-53.
(15) For methods of 4-quinolone synthesis, see: (a) Reynolds, G.; Hauser,
C. In Organic Syntheses; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1955; Collect. Vol.
III., pp 593 and 374. (b) Heindel, N. D.; Kennewell, P. D.; Fish, V. B. J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 1969, 6, 77-81 and references therein. (c) Potts, K. T.;
Ehlinger, R.; Nichols, W. M. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2596-2600. (d) Chen,
B.-C.; Huang, X.; Wang, J. Synthesis 1987, 482-483.
(10) Soder, L.; Wizinger, R. HelV. Chim. Acta. 1959, 42, 1733-1737
and 1779-1785.
(11) For the mechanistic aspect of this type of reactions, see: (a) refs
1a (pp 258-260) and 2c,d,g. (b) Cheng, Y.-S.; Ho, E.; Mariano, P. S.;
Ammon, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5678-5686. (c) Lucchini, V.; Prato,
M.; Scorrano, G.; Stivanello, M.; Valle, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1992, 259-266. (d) Kobayashi, S.; Ishitani, H.; Nagayama, S. Synthesis
1995, 1195-1202. (e) Linkert, F.; Laschat, S.; Kotila, S.; Fox, T.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 955-970.
(16) For methods of 2,3-dihydro-4-quinolone synthesis, see: (a) Elder-
field, R. C.; Maggiolo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 78, 1906-1910. (b)
Kano, S.; Ebata, T.; Shibuya, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2105-
2111. (c) Ongania, K.; Hohenlohe-Oehringen, K. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114,
1203-1205. (d) Donnelly, J. A.; Farrell, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
1757-1761. (e) Nieman, J. A.; Ennis, M. D. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2175-
2177 and references therein.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 25, 2002
4413