C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
f cis isomerization the threshold voltage varies with the distance
as 0.1 and 0.7 V/Å, while for the cis f trans it amounts to 0.3 and
0.2 V/Å. Small tip heights are not included because in this region
there is a change in slope, probably related to electronic effects
that come into play at small tip heights (i.e., large currents). These
values are smaller than those calculated for switching TBA
molecules by the electric field in the gas phase (about 1-2 V/Å11),
which is likely due to the presence of the surface that enhances the
permanent dipole and the polarizability of the molecule. Addition-
ally, the exact variation of these parameters along the reaction path
was not included in the model. The different slopes for positive
and negative voltages in the case of trans f cis isomerization as
compared to the cis f trans process (Figure 2) are likely due to
the delicate balance between the intrinsic dipole moment of the
molecule and its polarizability for the different adsorption geom-
etries and reaction paths.
In conclusion, we have shown that the trans-cis isomerization
of TBA molecules can be reversibly induced on Au(111). The
relationship between the applied bias voltage necessary for switch-
ing and the tip height shows that the process is caused by the electric
field between the STM tip and the sample surface.
Figure 2. Plot of the threshold voltage as a function of tip height for the
trans f cis isomerization (top) and for the cis f trans isomerization
(bottom) for positive (electric field points toward the STM tip) and negative
voltage polarities. The experimental points have been measured by fixing
the tip at a specific height (referred to the bare Au(111) surface and
calibrated by recording I(z) curves) and applying a voltage pulse for a fixed
time of t ) 30 s. Starting from V ) 0, we increased the voltage by
increments of 0.1 V until we observed a switching event in a lateral area
of 80 × 80 Å2 from the tip position. Each sequence was repeated 10 times.
The linear fit of the data is done for points above 9.5 and 11 Å (cis f
trans at negative voltages). The tunneling current is 7 ( 1 nA (trans f
cis) and 8 ( 1 nA (cis f trans) at a tip height of 3.7 Å and 52 ( 6 pA
(trans f cis) and 67 ( 6 pA (cis f trans) at 6.7 Å tip height.
Acknowledgment. We thank Christian Roth for technical
support, and Peter Saalfrank for fruitful discussions. Partial funding
by the European Integrated Project PICO INSIDE and the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG GR 2697/1-1 and SFB 658) is
gratefully acknowledged. M.P. and S.H. acknowledge generous
support by the Max Planck Society (MPG).
The cis-isomer appears with a bright central intensity maximum,
while three lateral lobes in triangular shape can be resolved (Figure
1e). From the STM images, we propose a structural model in which
one phenyl moiety remains on the surface while the second phenyl
ring is pointing upward (Figure 1g). As observed by STM7 and in
agreement with the conformation in the gas phase,4 the cis-isomer
is not planar.
Supporting Information Available: Movie of an isomerization
sequence and experimental details. This material is available free of
References
We have investigated the dependence of the voltage (necessary
for the isomerization) on the tip height for both polarities and
isomerization processes (Figure 2). The data show that switching
is possible with positive and negative voltage polarities, and the
threshold voltage is not a constant value, characteristic in the case
of electron resonant tunneling,10 but clearly increases (at large tip
heights) when retracting the tip. The isomerization process occurs
also at very large tip distances where no tunneling current is flowing
(the tunneling current decreases exponentially with the tip-surface
distance). Even in the extreme case when the tip is 36 Å above the
surface, we were able to switch molecules from trans to cis (after
applying a voltage pulse of 6.8 V).9 Moreover, it is also possible
to isomerize molecules when the tip is positioned above the bare
surface nearby the island.
All these observations, together with the large lateral extension
over which switched molecules are observed, let us conclude that
the isomerization of TBA molecules on Au(111) is driven by the
electric field in the STM junction, which does not involve tunneling
of electrons. This mechanism has not been observed experimentally
so far, but was predicted by calculations.11,12 In the presence of an
electric field, the potential energy surface related to the reaction
can be deformed, thus leading to an effective lowering of the
isomerization barrier. This effect, based on the (de)stabilization of
certain molecular configurations, depends on the presence and
orientation of an intrinsic dipole moment and also on the polariz-
ability of the molecule.11
(1) Gimzewski, J. K.; Joachim, C. Science 1999, 283, 1683.
(2) Molecular Switches; Feringa, B. L., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2001.
(3) For a prominent example, see: Donhauser, Z. J.; Mantooth, B. A.; Kelly,
K. F.; Bumm, L. A.; Monnell, J. D.; Stapleton, J. J.; Price, D. W., Jr.;
Rawlett, A. M.; Allara, D. L.; Tour, J. M.; Weiss, P. S. Science 2001,
292, 2303.
(4) (a) Rau, H. In Photochromism: Molecules and Systems; Du¨rr, H., Bouas-
Laurent, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; p 165. (b) Fangha¨nel, D.;
Timpe, G.; Orthman, V. In Organic Photochromes; El’tsov, A. V., Ed.;
Consultants Bureau: New York, 1990; p 105.
(5) (a) Na¨gele, T.; Hoche, R.; Zinth, W.; Wachtveitl, J. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1997, 272, 489. (b) Ishikawa, T.; Noro, T.; Shoda, T. J. Chem. Phys.
2001, 115, 7503. (c) Hugel, T.; Holland, N. B.; Cattani, A.; Moroder, L.;
Seitz, M.; Gaub, H. Science 2002, 296, 1103.
(6) (a) Kirakosian, A.; Comstock, M. J.; Cho, J.; Crommie, M. F. Phys. ReV.
B 2005, 71, 113409. (b) Comstock, M. J.; Cho, J.; Kirakosian, A.;
Crommie, M. F. Phys. ReV. B 2005, 72, 153414. (c) Miwa, J. A.; Weigelt,
S.; Gersen, H.; Besenbacher, F.; Rosei, F.; Linderoth, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 3164.
(7) Choi, B. Y.; Kahng, S. J.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, H. W.; Song, Y. J.;
Ihm, J.; Kuk, Y. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2006, 96, 156106.
(8) Henzl, J.; Mehlhorn, M.; Gawronski, H.; Rieder, K. H.; Morgenstern, K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 603.
(9) See Supporting Information.
(10) Lastapis, M.; Martin, M. Riedel, D.; Hellner, L.; Comtet, G.; Dujardin,
G. Science 2005, 308, 1000-1003.
(11) Fu¨chsel, G.; Klamroth, T.; Dokic, J.; Saalfrank, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006,
110, 16337.
(12) Saalfrank, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 3780.
By performing a linear regression of the data in Figure 2
considering the large tip height regime, we found that for the trans
JA065449S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 45, 2006 14447