T. Das, M. Mohar and A. Bag
Tetrahedron Letters 65 (2021) 152750
its Zn(II) complex because the latter is more rigid in nature [33].
Similarly fluorene’s quantum yield is 5 times more than that of
its flexible analog biphenyl [33]. So using the concept of restricted
rotation, a chloride sensor has been designed using methyl 20-
aminobiphenyl-4-carboxylate.
amine derivative from that nitro compound. In general amine com-
pounds are good hydrogen bond donors and biphenyl compounds
are non-rigid molecules. So an interaction of an anion with an
amine compound can lead to either change of fluorescence or color.
So it can act as a guest responsive material. Upon reduction of this
nitro derivative using iron powder and acetic acid, methyl 20-
aminobiphenyl-4-carboxylate (4) is obtained (Fig. 1).
Results and discussion
All the compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, IR
spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Compound 4 is a biphenyl
derivative and as a result, it shows bright blue fluorescence. In gen-
eral, fluorescence is favored for rigid molecules. But biphenyl
derivatives contain a pivotal bond via which two phenyl rings
are attached to each other and free rotation of the phenyl rings
along the pivotal bond always takes place unless the ortho sub-
stituents of the phenyl rings are not too bulky. Thus, if we compare
biphenyl and the rigid analog of the biphenyl i.e. fluorene, then we
will find that the quantum yield of biphenyl system is pretty much
less as compared to fluorene. The marked difference in the fluores-
cence output of biphenyl and fluorenone arises due to the addi-
tional methylene group in fluorene which restricts the free
rotation of the two phenyl rings. The reason for the lower quantum
yield for non-rigid molecules is due to the enhancement in the rate
of internal conversion which increases the chance of radiationless
deactivation whereas in the case of rigid molecules, the rate of
radiationless deactivation is much less and this results in higher
quantum efficiency. In the case of compound 4, there is one amine
group at the 20 position of the two phenyl rings with respect to the
pivotal bond. If somehow this amine group is utilized to bind a
guest molecule via hydrogen bonding then this will prevent the
free rotation of the phenyl rings which will enhance the emission
of the guest-bound biphenyl. Amine being a good hydrogen bond
donor, anion binding experiment was thought with compound 4.
Different tetrabutylammonium anions were added to the THF solu-
tion of compound 4ꢁ THF solution of compound 4 shows bright
blue emission. But in presence of chloride ion, the emission chan-
ged to bright green instantaneously (Fig. 2). No significant changes
were observed in the case of other anions.
To investigate the binding process, we performed UV–vis and
fluorescence spectroscopy. Fig. 3 shows the change in the emission
and absorption spectra of 4 in THF in the presence of different
anions. Compound 4 shows emission maxima around 460 nm
(Fig. 3a). But after the gradual addition of chloride ion, the emis-
sion intensity increased with a little red-shift. While in the case
of absorption spectroscopy, compound 4 showed two absorption
maxima at 251 and 332 nm (Fig. 3b). But after the gradual addition
of chloride ion to the solution of compound 4, the intensity of the
band at 332 nm was found to decrease to an extent. We have
checked the effect of other anions on compound 4 using fluores-
cence spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. S4). But only in presence
of chloride ion significant emission enhancement was observed
(Supplementary Fig. S5). Using the fluorescence spectroscopy, the
binding constant and binding stoichiometry were determined from
the Benesi-Hildebrand double reciprocal plot (Fig. 4a). The binding
constant value was 1.06 X 104 Mꢀ1 and binding stoichiometry was
1:1. We have also determined the 1:1 binding stoichiometry via
Job’s plot (Supplementary Fig. S6). From the fluorescence spec-
troscopy, the detection limit for chloride ion in THF was found to
In this present work, biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid (1) was synthe-
sized via the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction by reacting
4-bromobenzoic acid and phenylboronic acid in water with a water
soluble palladium catalyst (Fig. 1) [34]. Then our target was to pro-
duce regioselective nitro derivative from compound 1. We were
interested to get the nitro group at 20 position because that could
act as a precursor for different useful compounds such as car-
bazole, amino acid, etc. But the task was not simple because biphe-
nyl is an electron rich system. So normal nitration with biphenyl
using mixed acid can lead to multi-nitro substituted products.
Even if we lower the temperature, 40 position is more likely to
become nitrated than that of 20 position because of lesser steric
strain. The only possible way to synthesize 20-nitrobiphenyl is to
use costly 2-nitrophenylboronic acid. From that angle, the chal-
lenge was taken to synthesize this in a cost-efficient manner. At
first, we tried to nitrate compound 1 directly. But there was a prob-
lem regarding the solubility. To increase the solubility, compound
1 was esterified. Compound 2 was prepared by esterification of
compound 1 using thionyl chloride and methanol. Then compound
2 was subjected to nitration using 70% nitric acid and acetic anhy-
dride at ꢀ15 °C and methyl 20-nitrobiphenyl-4-carboxylate (3) was
obtained with 80% yield. To confirm the position of the nitro group
more accurately, we crystallized compound 3 in a methanol-ace-
tone mixed solvent. Good quality yellow colored single crystals
were obtained in a methanol-acetone mixture. Compound 3 was
also characterized using single crystal XRD. The crystal was dif-
fracted in Bruker saint (CCDC 2033350). The monoclinic crystal
structure of compound 3 is given in Supplementary Fig. S1.
Table S1 shows the detail of the crystal. Supplementary Fig. S2
shows the higher order packing diagram of compound 3. The selec-
tivity towards 20 position is arising because the nitronium ion in
association with acetic anhydride interacts with the ester oxygen
of compound 4. Via this interaction, the nitronium ion gets closer
access towards 20 position and as a result, selective nitration takes
place at 20 position (Supplementary Fig. S3). We tried to prepare an
be 1.43
lM (Fig. 4b). We have also compared the detection limit
of our sensor with earlier reported sensors (Supplementary
Table S2). To investigate the chloride binding process more accu-
rately, 1H NMR spectroscopy was also performed (Fig. 5). 1H
NMR spectroscopy was performed in CDCl3. Compound 4 was dis-
solved in CDCl3 and to this solution, tetrabutylammonium chloride
(TBACl) was added gradually. Compound 4 has eight aromatic pro-
tons and there are six signals in the range of 6.7–8.2 ppm. In the 1H
NMR spectroscopy, all the aromatic protons underwent an upfield
Fig. 1. Synthetic scheme of compound 4.
2