Figure 1. Molecular structure of compound 1.
However, exciplex formation, to the best of our knowledge,
is not usually used as a signaling mechanism for anion
recognition, though it has been documented previously.
Figure 2. Fluorescence spectra of compound 1 (10 µM) in
9
-
-
2 4
acetonitrile upon addition of (A) different anions (F , H PO ,
Herein, we report a new fluorescent chemosensor consist-
ing of aminonaphthol, which can be used for the selective
detection of fluoride anion. The signal reporting of such a
sensor derives from the fact that with addition of fluoride
anion species, the fluorescence of compound 1 is quenched
gradually and a new peak at a longer wavelength clearly
appears simultaneously. The mechanism of the new peak
formation in the fluorescence spectrum is also discussed.
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 3
AcO , HSO , NO , Cl , Br , I ) (100 µM) and (B) different
-
concentrations of F . Excitation wavelength: 320 nm.
in acetonitrile. Figure 2B shows that with increasing con-
centration of fluoride anion, the fluorescence intensity of
compound 1 at 360 nm decreases and a new broad emission
band peaked at 455 nm emerges with increasing intensity.
Meanwhile, a distinct isoemissive point at 405 nm is also
observed. This implies that a 1:1 complex is formed and the
increase of fluorescent intensity at 455 nm is closely
correlated with the decrease of the intensity at 360 nm,
revealing a definite relationship between peaks at 360 and
1
Compound 1 was synthesized and characterized by H
NMR, MS, and elemental analysis (Supporting Information).
The molecular structure was shown in Figure 1. It was
designed as an efficient fluoride-selective fluorescent
chemosensor on the basis of consideration that a fluoride
anion can strongly interact with a hydrogen-donating group
such as hydroxyl or amide through hydrogen bonding
interaction to form HF. Therefore, it is necessary and
4
55 nm. On the basis of the spectral results and possible
structural change of compound 1 upon addition of fluoride
anion, the luminescence at 455 nm can be reasonably
attributed to the exciplex formation by a photoinduced
electron-transfer process between the naphthoxy moiety and
antipyrine moiety of the molecule. As noted above, in the
absence of fluoride anion, compound 1 contains an intramo-
lecular hydrogen bonding structure and possesses a rigid
structure that is difficult to fold. However, when fluoride
anion is added, the original intramolecular hydrogen bonding
is broken due to the stronger interaction between fluoride
anion and hydroxyl group. As a result, the whole molecular
structure becomes flexible, which makes it easy for the two
parts of compound 1 to fold. Consequently, a photoinduced
electron-transfer process may induce the interaction of the
naphthoxy with the antipyrine, leading to exciplex formation,
as shown in Scheme 1.
important that the -OH or/and -NH
2
groups of compound
1
serve as a part of the receptor. On the other hand, to
improve the sensitivity of the chemosensor with PET
reporting system, it is better to have a competitive mechanism
of hydrogen bonding formation introduced during the
recognition process. For instance, the formation of an
intramolecular hydrogen bond makes the structure of com-
pound 1 rigid when the fluoride is absent, whereas replace-
ment of the hydrogen bonding by the fluoride anion will
change the structure of compound 1 from rigid to flexible.
As a result, the presence of fluoride anion will induce an
evident change in the fluorescence spectrum of compound
1.
Figure 2A shows variations of the fluorescence spectra of
The stability constant of the complex was calculated by
compound 1 in acetonitrile in the presence of different anions
1
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
the linear Benesi-Hildebrand expression:
such as F , H
PO
2 4
, AcO , HSO
4
, NO
3
, Cl , Br , and
-
I . It is clear that compound 1 can recognize fluoride anion
1
1
1
1
with excellent sensitivity and selectivity over other anions
)
+
∆I
[1]∆X K [1]∆X [F]
ass
(7) (a) Nishizawa, S.; Kaneda, H.; Uchida, T.; Teramae, N. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 2325. (b) Nishizawa, S.; Kato, Y.; Teramae,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9463. (c) Albelda, M. T.; Garcia-Espana,
E.; Gil, L.; Lima, J. C.; Lodeiro, C.; Seixas de Melo, J.; Melo, M. J.; Parola,
A. J.; Pina, F.; Soriano, C. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003, 107, 6573. (d) Thomas,
A.; Polarz, S.; Antonietti, M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2003, 107, 5081. (e)
Reichwagen, J.; Hopf, H.; Del Guerzo, A.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Bouas-Laurent,
H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1899.
where, ∆I is the change in the fluorescence intensity at 360
nm; Kass is the stability constant; ∆X is the difference of
fluorescence quantum yields between the complex and
compound 1; and [1] and [F] are the concentrations of
compound 1 and fluoride anion, respectively. On the basis
(
8) (a) Xu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X.; Cui, J.; Cui, D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
89. (b) Wu, F.-Y.; Jiang, Y.-B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 355, 438.
9) (a) Kawai, T.; Ikegami, M.; Arai, T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 824. (b)
8
(
(10) (a) Benesi, H. A.; Hildebrand, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71,
2703. (b) Barra, M.; Bohne, C.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 8075
Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Lodeiro, C.; Masotti, A.; Parola, A. J.; Pina, F.;
Seixas de Melo, J.; Valtancoli, B. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1639.
2134
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 11, 2005