Fig. 1 Plot of a molecule of {Ru(dppe)Cp*}2{m-(C·C)7} (8). Significant
bond distances and angles: Ru–C(1) 1.958(5), C(1)–C(2) 1.236(7), C(2)–
C(3) 1.354(7), C(3)–C(4) 1.226(7), C(4)–C(5) 1.351(7), C(5)–C(6)
1.218(7), C(6)–C(7) 1.357(7), C(7)–C(7A) 1.222(7) Å; Ru–C(1)–C(2)
173.8(5), C(1)–C(2)–C(3) 176.0(5), C(2)–C(3)–C(4) 178.6(6), C(3)–C(4)–
C(5) 178.5(6), C(4)–C(5)–C(6) 177.5(7), C(5)–C(6)–C(7) 178.1(6), C(6)–
C(7)–C(7A) 178.7(6)°.
Fig. 2 Plot of a molecule of {Co3(m-dppm)(CO)7}2{m3:m3-C(C·C)7C} (9).
Significant bond distances and angles: C(1)–C(2) 1.371(6), C(2)–C(3)
1.221(8), C(3)–C(4) 1.336(8), C(4)–C(5) 1.228(8), C(5)–C(6) 1.339(8),
C(6)–C(7) 1.221(8), C(7)–C(8) 1.343(9), C(8)–C(8A) 1.211(9) Å; C(1)–
C(2)–C(3) 176.4(5), C(2)–C(3)–C(4) 169.7(6), C(3)–C(4)–C(5) 176.2(6),
C(4)–C(5)–C(6) 178.9(6), C(5)–C(6)–C(7) 178.4(6), C(6)–C(7)–C(8)
178.6(6), C(7)–C(8)–C(8A) 179.6(7)°.
organometallic nuclei in the product obtained from the reaction
14
between Fe{h-C5H4C·CAu(PPh3)}2
and Co3(m-CBr)(m-
20.221(3) Å, b = 97.901(3)°, V = 3657 Å3, Z = 2; Ntot = 36 221, N =
7475 (Rint = 0.041), Nobs = 5206; R = 0.057, Rw = 0.067. CCDC 223663
tallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
dppm)(CO)7, which afforded Fe{h-C5H4C·C-m3-C[Co3(m-
dppm)(CO)7]}2 (7; 96% yield). The X-ray structure of 7 will be
described elsewhere.
The Pd(0)/Cu( )-catalysed reaction of Ru{(C·C)2Au(PPh3)}(dp-
I
1 (a) M. I. Bruce and P. J. Low, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 2004, 50, 231;
(b) S. Szafert and J. A. Gladysz, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 4175; (c) U.
Rosenthal, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1794; (d) H. Lang, D. S.
A. George and G. Rheinwald, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 206–207, 101;
(e) F. Paul and C. Lapinte, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 178–180, 431; (f)
M. Brady, W. Wenig, Y. Zhou, J. W. Seyler, A. J. Amoroso, A. M. Arif,
M. Böhme, G. Frenking and J. A. Gladysz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 775; (g) M. Akita and Y. Moro-oka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1995,
68, 420.
2 (a) N. Robertson and C. A. McGowan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2003, 32, 96;
(b) N. J. Long and C. K. Williams, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42,
2586; (c) U. H. F. Bunz, Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 1047; U. H. F. Bunz,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 968; (d) H. Lang, Angew.
Chem., 1994, 106, 569; H. Lang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994,
33, 547; (e) M. H. Chisholm, Angew. Chem., 1991, 103, 690; M. H.
Chisholm, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 673.
pe)Cp* with I(C·C)3I afforded {Ru(dppe)Cp*}2{m-(C·C)7} (8;
36% yield), the first C14 complex to be structurally characterised.‡
A centrosymmetric molecule of 8 is shown in Fig. 1, with selected
bond parameters given in the caption. As can be seen, the C14 chain
is essentially straight, with deviations from linearity at the carbon
atoms of between 1.3 and 6.2°; whilst the sum of deviations
amounts to 37.6° and the separation of the two Ru centres
[20.560(5) Å] is only 0.06 Å shorter than the sum of the Ru–C and
C–C distances. The C–C separations alternate [ranges
1.211–1.228(8) and 1.336–1.371(8) Å for the short (C·C) and long
(C–C) distances, respectively] as expected for a conjugated
polyyne system, with the longer bonds being in the middle of the
C
14 chain.
A sequence involving coupling of Co3(m3-CBr)(m-dppm)(CO)7
with Me3Si(C·C)2Au(PPh3) to give Co3{m3-C(C·C)2SiMe3}(m-
dppm)(CO)7, followed by a second auration as described above,
afforded Co3{m3-C(C·C)2Au(PR3)}(m-dppm)(CO)7. Reaction with
I(C·C)3I then gave the bis(cluster) C16 derivative {Co3(m-
dppm)(CO)7}2{m3:m3-C(C·C)7C} (9; 86%), also structurally char-
acterised.‡ Fig. 2 shows a plot of a centrosymmetric molecule of 9,
with selected bond parameters collected in the caption. There are no
unusual features in the Co3 clusters, while the C16 chain is also
close to linear, with a maximum deviation of 10.3° from linearity at
C(3) and a C(1)…C(1A) separation of 19.176(8) Å, which is 0.15 Å
shorter than the sum of the C–C distances.
In conclusion, we have devised and demonstrated a novel
reaction sequence with the power to generate a wide range of new
complexes containing odd- or even-numbered carbon chains with
up to (so far) 16 carbon atoms, with either identical or dissimilar
metal–ligand end-caps on the chains. These new materials have
interesting redox, optical and electronic properties, which will be
detailed elsewhere.
3 (a) M. I. Bruce, P. J. Low, K. Costuas, J.-F. Halet, S. P. Best and G. A.
Heath, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 1949; (b) M. I. Bruce, B. G. Ellis,
P. J. Low, B. W. Skelton and A. H. White, Organometallics, 2003, 22,
3184.
4 (a) T. Bartik, B. Bartik, M. Brady, R. Dembinskli and J. A. Gladysz,
Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 467; T. Bartik, B. Bartik, M. Brady, R.
Dembinskli and J. A. Gladysz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35,
414; (b) R. Dembinski, T. Bartik, B. Bartik, M. Jaeger and J. A. Gladysz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 810.
5 A. Sakurai, M. Akita and Y. Moro-oka, Organometallics, 1999, 18,
3241.
6 S. Rigaut, J. Perruchon, L. Le Pichon, D. Touchard and P. H. Dixneuf,
J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 670, 37.
7 G.-L. Xu, G. Zou, Y.-H. Ni, M. C. DeRoss, R. J. Crutchley and T. Ren,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10 057.
8 (a) T. B. Peters, J. C. Bohling, A. M. Arif and J. A. Gladysz,
Organometallics, 1999, 18, 3261; (b) W. Mohr, J. Stahl, F. Hampel and
J. A. Gladysz, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 3263; (c) W. Mohr, J. Stahl, F.
Hampel and J. A. Gladysz, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 3324; (d) J. Stahl, J.
C. Bohling, E. B. Bauer, T. B. Peters, W. Mohr, J. M. Matin-Alvarez, F.
Hampel and J. A. Gladysz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1872.
9 D. Seyferth and C. L. Nivert, J. Organomet. Chem., 1976, 113, C65.
10 G. H. Worth, B. H. Robinson and J. Simpson, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1993, 450, 219.
We thank the Australian Research Council for support of this
work and Johnson Matthey plc, Reading, UK, for generous loans of
RuCl3·nH2O and OsO4.
11 M. I. Bruce, K. A. Kramarczuk, G. J. Perkins, B. W. Skelton, A. H.
White and N. N. Zaitseva, J. Cluster Sci., 2004, 15, in press.
12 J. W. Lauher and K. Wald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 7648.
13 M. I. Bruce, B. W. Skelton, M. E. Smith and A. H. White, Aust. J.
Chem., 1999, 52, 431.
14 A. B. Antonova, M. I. Bruce and M. Jevric, unpublished work.
15 M. I. Bruce, M. E. Smith, N. N. Zaitseva, B. W. Skelton and A. H.
White, J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 670, 170.
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for 8: {Ru(dppe)Cp*}2{m-(C·C)7}·7C6H6
M
¯
= 1984.04; triclinic, space group P1, a =
C86H78P4Ru2·7C6H6, M
14.108(3), b = 14.438(3), c = 15.051(3) Å, a = 75.371(3), b = 88.083(3),
g = 60.879(3)°, V = 2577 Å3, Z = 1; 22 528 ( = Ntot) absorption-corrected
CCD diffractometer reflections (monochromatic Mo-Ka radiation, l =
0.71073 Å; 2qmax = 53°, T ≈ 153 K) merged to N unique = 10 149 (Rint
= 0.057), Nobs [F > 4s(F)] = 7823; R = 0.062, Rw = 0.078. For 9:
16 H. Hopf and B. Witulski, in Modern Acetylene Chemistry, ed. P. J. Stang
and F. Diederich, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, p. 33.
17 K. Gao and N. S. Goroff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9320.
{Co3(m-dppm)(CO)7}2{m3:m3-C(C·C)7C}
1706.71; monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 9.170(1), b = 19.914(3), c =
M
C80H44Co6O14P4,
M
=
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 9 6 0 – 9 6 1
961