Scheme 1
Scheme 2
entry to the fully elaborated vinigrol carbon skeleton. In this
study, methyl groups at C(8) and C(9) were introduced at
the first stage and installation of the isopropyl at C(12) was
planned before the oxy-Cope rearrangement as outlined in
Scheme 1. To this end the tricyclic ketone 4, bearing the
methyl groups and conveniently positioned oxygen func-
tionalities, was first elaborated.
The synthesis began with the readily available trimethyl-
silyl enol ether 58 (Scheme 2). Heating this diene in the
presence of 1,4-benzoquinone in THF gave 7 in quantitative
yield. Treatment of 7 with a catalytic amount of BF3-Et2O
in THF at -70 °C cleanly led to the mixed trimethylsilyl
ketal 8. This alcohol was submitted to the Mitsunobu
inversion,13 using 4-nitrobenzoic acid,14 followed by cleavage
of the resulting ester under mild conditions (K2CO3, MeOH-
Et2O) to give 9. It is worthy of note that the first chromato-
graphic purification only occurred at this stage. The overall
yield of this five-step sequence, conveniently executed on a
20-g scale, was 65-70%.
Next, the hydroxymethyl group at C(3) was stereoselec-
tively introduced, using the Stork procedure.15 Thus, bromo-
methyldimethylsilyl ether 10, prepared by silylation of 9
(BrCH2SiMe2Cl, DMAP, Et3N), was subjected to standard
high-dilution, radical-generating conditions followed by
Tamao oxidation16 (H2O2, Na2CO3,THF-MeOH) to furnish
diol 11.
Treatment of 11 with 2,2-dimethoxypropane in the pres-
ence of p-toluenesulfonic acid resulted in the formation of
the acetonide protecting group concomitant with hydrolysis
of the mixed TMS ketal affording 12 in 67% overall yield
for the four-step sequence. Dehydration of 12 with phos-
phorus oxychloride in pyridine led to the key tricycyclic
ketone 4 in 93% yield.
Exposure of 4 to 3-methylbutynylmagnesium bromide17
in THF gave rise to a 4.2:1 mixture of exo- and endo-
propargyl alcohols 13 and 14 (94%) which were readily
separated by flash chromatography. In contrast to previous
observations in the model study,6 the presence of the exo-
methyl group at C(9) in 420 promoted the addition of the
Grignard reagent from the sterically less hindered endo face.
Since the oxy-Cope rearrangement proceeds via a chairlike
transition state, introduction of an isopropyl at C(12) with
the desired configuration requires a Z-geometry of the double
bond in the allylic alcohol precursor 15. This compound was
(8) Diene 5 was prepared from the commercialy available 2,6-dimethyl-
cyclohexanone by oxidation with NBS in refluxing CCl4 (4 h) in the
presence of a catalytic amount of AIBN (90%)9 followed by silylation of
the resulting 2,6-dimethylcyclohex-2-enone.10
(9) Kende, A. S.; Fludzinski, P. H.; Hill, J. H.; Swenson, W.; Clardy, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3551-3562.
(10) Rubottom, G. M.; Gruber, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1051-
1056.
(16) Tamao, K.; Kakui, T.; Akita, M.; Iwahara, T.; Kanatani, R.; Yoshida,
J.; Kumada, M. Tertrahedron 1983, 39, 983-990. Tamao, K.; Ishida, N.;
Ito, Y.; Kumada, M. Org. Synth. 1990, 69, 96-105.
(11) For similar transformations see: (a) Hung, S. C.; Liao, C. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4011-4014. Hung, S. C.; Liao, C. C. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1457-1458. (b) Chu-Moyer, M. Y.; Dan-
ishefsky, S. J.; Schulte, G. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11213-11228.
(12) Gemal, A. L.; Luche, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5454-
5459.
(17) This Grignard reagent was prepared by the action of ethylmagnesium
bromide on isopropylacetylene, which was obtained from 2-methylbut-3-
yn-1-ol in two steps: bromination (47% aq HBr, CuBr, NH4Br, Cu)18
followed by reduction of the resulting bromoallene with LiAlH4 in
DME.19
(18) Landor, S. R.; Patel, A. N.; Whiter, P. F.; Greaves, P. M. J. Chem.
Soc. C 1966, 1223-1226.
(13) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1-28. Hughes, D. L. Org. React.
1992, 42, 335-656.
(19) Fleming, I.; Lawrence, N. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992,
3309-3326.
(14) Dodge, J. A.; Trujillo, J. I.; Presnell, M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
234-236.
(20) The exo configuration of the methyl group at C(9) was confirmed
by X-ray crystallographic anallysis of an analogue compound.21
(15) Stork, G.; Kahn, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 500-501.
1140
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 7, 2003