A. N. Balaev et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 5745–5747
5747
Among the reagents used (entries 1–4), PIDA gave a slightly bet-
ter yield than PIFA and HTIB, and subsequent experiments were car-
ried out with PIDA. During the next optimization (entries 5–12), it
was found that the significant factors for the success of this reaction
were the amount of PIDA, the time of exposure, as well as the frac-
tional addition of the reagent. Thus, with the optimum conditions
the isolated yield of target 1 was 54%. The reaction procedure is very
structure in this Letter have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication CCDC 1016617.
. Compound 3: Pentafluorophenyl ester 2 (9.29 g, 25 mmol) was dissolved in
CH Cl (80 ml). To this, 5-methyl ester L-glutamic acid hydrochloride (5.93 g,
2 2
30 mmol) and NMM (3.14 g, 31 mmol) were added at rt, and the reaction
mixture was stirred for 48 h and washed with 15% citric acid solution (40 ml).
6
2 4
The organic layer was dried over Na SO and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was dissolved in MeCN (10 ml) and the contents were
allowed to stand at 5 °C for 1 d. The resulting precipitate was filtered and dried
under reduced pressure. Yield 7.09 g (81%). White amorphous powder; purity
1
0
simple. A mixture of pyridine and 1,4-dioxane was added to a solu-
tion of tripeptide 5 in H O. The solution was cooled in an ice bath and
2
5
1
9
1
6.2% (HPLC); [
a
]
D
À66.80 (c 5, MeOH); H NMR (360.13 MHz, d
6
-DMSO): d
2
.70–1.94 (m, 4H), 1.96–2.12 (m, 2H), 2.33–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.66–2.88 (m, 2H),
then PIDA (2.4 equiv) in 1,4-dioxane was added at 5 °C. After three
hours, an additional quantity of PIDA (1.6 equiv) was added and
the mixture was stirred for a further two hours. The mixture was
diluted with ice water, washed twice with ethyl acetate, and once
with ethyl acetate/butanol (4:1). The aqueous layer was evaporated
and the residue was chromatographed (HPLC) to give target 1.
In summary, we have reported a useful and short method for
the synthesis of H-b-Ala-Pro-DabNHBz (1). The synthesis has been
carried out without the use of protecting groups/deprotection
3.35–3.56 (m, 2H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.68–3.81 (m, 2H), 4.14–4.30 (m, 1H), 4.32–
.45 (m, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 0.6H) and 8.33 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 0.4H) (due to
rotamers), 12.58 (br s, 1H); MS (ESI), m/z (%): 349.3 [M+H] (100).
Compound 4: Acid 3 (6.98 g, 20 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (80 ml) and cooled
to 0 °C. BzNH2 (2.46 g, 23 mmol), HOBt monohydrate (3.52 g, 23 mmol), and
DCC (4.33 g, 21 mmol) were added successively. After stirring at 5 °C for 18 h,
the DCU by-product was filtered off and the filtrate diluted with EtOAc
4
+
7
.
(
250 ml). The organic layer was washed with brine (2 Â 100 ml), 5% citric acid
solution (2 Â 70 ml), 1 M NaHCO (2 Â 70 ml), and H O (2 Â 70 ml) and dried
3
2
over Na
solidified on triturating with Et
69%). White amorphous powder; purity 95.9% (HPLC); [
2
SO
4
. On evaporating the EtOAc, an oily residue was obtained, which
2
O (50 ml) and slight warming. Yield 6.05 g
25
(
a
]
D
À62.63 (c 5,
): d 1.94–2.18 (m, 6H), 2.35–2.51 (m, 2H),
2.67-2.88 (m, 2H), 3.45-3.76 (m, 4H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 4.24–4.32 (m, 1H), 4.40–4.58
strategies, uses readily available reagents, and relies on
a
1
MeOH); H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl
3
Hofmann-type rearrangement as the final step. Hopefully, this
new synthetic procedure will receive further attention for the
preparation of DAB-containing peptides.
(
[
m, 3H), 7.15–7.36 (m, 6H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H); MS (ESI), m/z (%): 438.4
M+H] (100), 460.0 [M+Na] (1.6).
+
+
8.
Compound 5: Dipeptide 4 (5.69 g, 13 mmol) was dissolved in 20% methanolic
NH (200 ml) at 10 °C and kept for 48 h at rt. MeOH was distilled in vacuo and
3
the oily residue triturated with THF (3 Â 40 ml) until solidification occurred.
References and notes
Crude 5 was filtered, dissolved in MeOH, and purified by flash chromatography
on silica gel (MeOH/CHCl
3
, 1:1). Yield 2.93 g (51%). White amorphous powder;
1
.
Pentapharm A. -G. WO 20,060,447,900, 2006; Chem. Abstr. 2006, 144, 456033.
23
1
purity 96.8% (HPLC); [
a
]
D
À40.70 (c 5, MeOH); H NMR (360.13 MHz, d
6
-
DMSO): d 1.72–2.38 (m, 8H), 2.53–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.05 (m, 2H), 3.36–3.61
(
m, 2H), 4.09–4.44 (m, 4H), 4.87 (br s, 3H), 7.19–7.33 (m, 5H), 7.73 (br s, 2H);
13
C NMR (90.56 MHz, D
2
O): d 23.60, 25.94, 28.99, 30.21, 30.54, 34.60, 42.33,
4
1
7.18, 53.51, 59.83, 126.60, 126.86, 128.12, 137.73, 170.27, 172.31, 173.72,
2
3
.
.
+
+
77.18; MS (ESI), m/z (%): 404.3 [MÀCl] (100), 426.2 [MÀHCl+Na] (12.5),
2
5
White crystals; purity 97.8% (HPLC); mp 82–84 °C; [
a
]
D
À74.95 (c 5, MeOH);
): d 1.84–2.27 (m, 4H), 2.76–2.84 (m, 2H), 3.46–
.65 (m, 2H), 3.66–3.83 (m, 2H), 4.42–4.54 (m, 1H), 10.25 (s, 1H); MS (ESI), m/z
+
+
1
H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl
3
9
.
3
+
+
+
(
%): 206.5 [M+H] (100), 228.2 [M+Na] (28.4), 433.3 [2M+Na] (94.0).
1
0. H-b-Ala-Pro-DabNHBz (1): Tripeptide 5 (2.64 g, 6 mmol) was dissolved in H
60 ml). To this solution were added 1,4-dioxane (30 ml) and Py (8 ml). The
mixture was cooled to 5 °C, followed by the addition of PIDA (4.64 g,
4.4 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (60 ml). After stirring at 5 °C for 3 h, another
portion of PIDA (3.09 g, 9.6 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (40 ml) was added. Stirring
was continued for 2 h and the mixture was diluted with ice-H O (100 ml) and
2
O
4
.
Compound 2: -Proline (11.50 g, 100 mmol) was suspended in CH Cl (100 ml).
L
2
2
(
The suspension was cooled to À10 °C and 3-chloropropanoyl chloride (6.35 g,
5
0
0 mmol) was added in one portion. After 30 min, the mixture was heated to
°C, washed with brine (2 Â 100 ml), and dried over Na SO . After cooling the
1
2
4
organic phase to À5 °C, PfpOH (9.20 g, 50 mmol) and DCC (11.35 g, 55 mmol) in
CH Cl (50 ml) were added. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. It was then
allowed to warm to rt, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
residue was stirred with Et O (10 ml) and hexane (30 ml) and left to stand
overnight at 5 °C. The solid residue thus obtained was separated from the
solution by filtration and recrystallized from Et O–hexane. Yield 10.44 g (56%).
Large colorless crystals; purity 98.1% (HPLC); mp 51–53 °C; [
2
2
2
EtOAc (300 ml). The aqueous layer was washed with EtOAc (2 Â 100 ml) and
EtOAc/BuOH (4:1) (100 ml) and evaporated under reduced pressure. The
residue was chromatographed (HPLC) to give target 1 as yellowish oil. Yield
2
24
1
1
.61 g (54%). Purity >98% (HPLC);
360.13 MHz, CD OD): 1.94–2.12 (m, 4H), 2.18–2.29 (m, 2H), 2.77 (t,
J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.05 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.15 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.54–3.68 (m,
[
a
]
D
À81.32 (c 1, MeOH);
H NMR
2
(
3
d
2
4
a
]
D
À78.80 (c 5,
): d 1.98–2.29 (m, 3H), 2.33–2.54 (m, 1H),
.82 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.57–3.93 (m, 4H), 4.77–4.86 (m, 1H); MS (ESI), m/z (%):
1
CHCl
2
3
3
); H NMR (360.13 MHz, CDCl
3
13
2
(
5
H), 4.38–4.43 (m, 3H), 4.48–4.54 (m, 1H), 7.21–7.34 (m, 5H); C NMR
90.56 MHz, D O): d 23.65, 28.04, 29.04, 30.34, 34.61, 35.81, 42.43, 47.23,
0.92, 59.47, 126.59, 126.92, 128.16, 137.06, 170.26, 171.43, 177.93; MS (ESI),
+
+
2
72.4 [M+H] (100), 394.1 [M+Na] (4.8).
5
.
Single crystal X-ray diffraction on a sample of 2 was performed by using a
Bruker SMART APEX2 diffractometer. Mercury software was used for the
crystal structure plot. Crystals at 150 K, orthorhombic, space group P 21 21 21,
a = 6.4269(2) Å, b = 9.9541(3) Å, c = 23.7321(6) Å. Crystallographic data for the
+
+
m/z (%): 376.2 [MÀAcOHÀAcO] (100), 751.1 [2MÀ3AcOHÀAcO] (33.2); IR
À1
(m
max, cm ): 3060, 2212, 1961, 1651, 1557, 1410, 1341, 1276, 1203, 1181,
1137, 1049, 1015, 924, 888, 837, 800, 723, 701, 659, 621.