Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 3 of 6
DOI: 10.1039/C8CC04279A
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
weaken the final pH-jump.4g For this reason; we also texted the Overall, we have demonstrated the feasibility of the above
pH change ability of 2-NBA in the presence of the suitable scheme that we proposed.
concentrations of nanoceria. Importantly, in the system
containing 0.1 mg/mL nanoceria, the presence of 4 mM 2-NBA containing 2-NBA and cerium oxide nanoparticles was highly
after UV irradiation could still cause pH jump of depended on the activated time of ultraviolet light. With the
approximately three units from 7.0 to 4.0 (Fig. 2B and Fig. S6). increasing of excitation time, the pH value decreased from 7.0
Although the pH change ability of 2-NBA/CeO2 hybrid system down to around gradually (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, the
More importantly, the pH change of the system
a
4
was slightly weaker than that containing 2-NBA alone, such corresponding catalytic activity of such system (using TMB as a
resulting pH shift was massive enough to change the oxidase- substrate) could be tuned easily by adjusting the illuminating
like activity of nanoceria remarkably.2a
time (Fig. 3 and Fig. S11). Similar result was also observed for
ABTS-based substrate (Fig. S12). Above results sufficiently
proved the activation efficiency of nanozymes are highly
tunable.
In summary, this study provides a first example of using
flash photolysis reagents for controlled activation of pH-
dependent activity of nanoceria. This strategy presented
herein is simple in design, label-free, non-invasive, and suitable
for almost all different nanozymes. Moreover, the activation
efficiency can be easily tailored. Since control of nanozymes’
activity can modulate their selectivity and catalytic efficiency
and avoid some potential problems,11 our work may open a
range of potential applications in future biomedical, industrial,
and environmental fields.
This work was supported by National Nature Science
Foundation (Nos. 21771150, 21401154, U1405226), 111
project (B16029), the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities of China (Nos. 20720170011,
20720140528), and Doctoral Fund of the Ministry of Education
(20130121110018).
Fig. 3 The pH change of 2-NBA/CeO2 hybrid system under different illuminating
time and the corresponding catalytical activity under different illuminating time.
[Intial pH] = 7.0, [Nanoceria] = 0.1 mg/mL, [TMB] = 1 mM, [2-NBA] = 4 mM,
[Phosphate buffer] = 0.5 mM.
Conflicts of interest
Next, we addressed the possibility of applying UV light to
switch the oxidase-like activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in
the presence of flash photolysis reagents. Without the
excitation of ultraviolet light, no distinct activity was observed
for all samples in 0.5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), even the
presence of both 2-NBA and nanoceria (Fig. 2C and Fig. 2D).
However, the reaction system containing 2-NBA and CeO2 NPs
after UV exposure showed strong ability toward the catalytic
oxidation of TMB to product oxTMB (Fig. 2C). We noted that to
avoid the oxidation of TMB by UV, TMB was added in the
above system after UV exposure. Moreover, the catalytic
ability of activated cerium oxide nanoparticles reached
approximately 97.1% of that at pH 4.0 (Fig. 2D). Above
experiments indicated that the resulting low pH from
photosensitive 2-NBA could almost entirely activate the
oxidase-like activity of nanoceria, and there was no significant
impact on the oxidase-like activity of nanoceria by 2-NBA, 2-
NBS and photoexcitation. In contrast, under the same
condition, neither nanoceria nor 2-NBA alone could catalyze
the oxidation TMB efficiently (Fig. 2C). It meant that without 2-
NBA, only ligh could not activate the activity of cerium oxide
nanoparticles. Also there was no significant impact on the
oxidation state of nanoceria upon the photoexcitation (Fig.
S7). Furthermore, our photo-activation method toward ABTS-
based substrate, citrate-based buffer and pH-dependent V2O5
peroxidase mimic, has also been demonstrated (Fig. S8-S10).
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1
a) L. Gao, J. Zhuang, L. Nie, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, N. Gu, T.
Wang, J. Feng, D. Yang, S. Perrett and X. Yan, Nat
Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 577-583; b) H. Wei and E. Wang,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 6060-6093; c) Y. Lin, J. Ren and X.
Qu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 1097-1105; d) W. Zhang, S.
Hu, J.-J. Yin, W. He, W. Lu, M. Ma, N. Gu and Y. Zhang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 5860-5865; de) Z. Chen, J.-J. Yin, Y.-T.
Zhou, Y. Zhang, L. Song, M. Song, S. Hu and N. Gu, ACS Nano,
2012,
2014,
6
, 4001-4012.f) C. Xu and X. Qu, Npg Asia Mater.,
6, e90; g) J. Wu, S. Li and H. Wei, Chem. Commun.,
2018, DOI: 10.1039/C8CC01202D; h) K. Fan, J. Xi, L. Fan, P.
Wang, C. Zhu, Y. Tang, X. Xu, M. Liang, B. Jiang, X. Yan and L.
Gao, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1440, i) H. Cheng, Y. Liu, Y. Hu,
Y. Ding, S. Lin, W. Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, F. Muhammad, X.
Zhao, D. Zhao, Z. Li, H. Xing and H. Wei, Anal. Chem., 2017,
89, 11552-11559.
2
a) A. Asati, S. Santra, C. Kaittanis, S. Nath and J. M. Perez,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2308-2312; b) E. G. Heckert,
A. S. Karakoti, S. Seal and W. T. Self, Biomaterials, 2008, 29
,
2705-2709; c) T. Pirmohamed, J. M. Dowding, S. Singh, B.
Wasserman, E. Heckert, A. S. Karakoti, J. E. S. King, S. Seal
and W. T. Self, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2736-2738; d) C.
Kaittanis, S. Santra, A. Asati and J. M. Perez, Nanoscale,
2012,
4
, 2117-2123; e) A. Asati, C. Kaittanis, S. Santra and J.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins