B. Akhtar et al.
Molecular Catalysis 506 (2021) 111527
Fig. 2. FT-IR spectrum of g-C3N4 bulk, I-TiO2, and I-TiO2/(X wt.%)CNNSs.
further purification. Deionized water was utilized during the experi-
ment. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the synthesized ma-
terials were carried out using a Bruker D8 Advance powder X-ray
for 4 h in a magnetic stirrer at 80 ◦C and at this stage, g-C3N4 nanosheets
are synthesized. After that, the temperature reduced to 50 ◦C and then,
the iodic acid solution (0.5 g iodic acid in 5.0 mL water) was added to
the above mixture and stirred for 30 min. Then, titanium (IV) butoxide
solution (1.0 mL titanium (IV) butoxide solution in 10.0 mL absolute
ethanol) was added dropwise to the resulting mixture and stirred for 2 h
at 50 ◦C. Afterward, the mixture was transferred in a Teflon lined
autoclave (150.0 mL) and retained at 180 ◦C for 24 h. Next, the I-TiO2/
CNNSs nanocomposite was obtained after centrifugation (8000 rpm for
10 min) and washed several times with H2O and ethanol, and dried
overnight at 80 ◦C. Various nanocomposites were obtained by changing
the amount of g-C3N4. The as-prepared samples were labeled as I-TiO2/
(20 wt.%)CNNSs, I-TiO2/(40 wt.%)CNNSs, I-TiO2/(60 wt.%)CNNSs,
respectively. I-TiO2 nanoparticles was synthesized using the same sol-
vothermal process mentioned above without adding g-C3N4.
diffractometer with Cu K
α (λ = 0.15406 nm) radiation over the
diffraction angle (2θ) of 10◦–90◦ and examined using X’pert Highscore
Plus software. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected
on a Shimadzu 8400S infrared spectrometer in the range of 400–4000
cmꢀ 1 using pressed KBr pellets. TESCAN MIRA3 field emission scanning
electron microscope (FE-SEM) was applied to analyze the morphologies
of the as-prepared samples. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and
differential thermal analysis (DTG) were performed on a Bahr STA504
analyzer in the range of 20ꢀ 900 ◦C with heating rate of 10 ◦C minꢀ 1
.
Ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the synthesized
samples were collected using a Shimadzu UV-2550 UV–vis spectropho-
tometer with an integrating sphere attachment within the range of
250–800 nm and with BaSO4 as the reflectance standard. Energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Elemental mapping-EDS were
examined by using a Zeiss Sigma VP Field Emission Scanning Electron
Microscope (FE-SEM) with an Oxford Instruments energy dispersive X-
ray spectrometer (EDS). The photoluminescence spectra of the samples
were collected by an Agilent G9800A fluorescence spectrometer with an
excitation wavelength at 380 nm. To determine the surface area and
pore size of the samples, the adsorption of nitrogen was performed at 77
K using a Microtrac Bel Corp Belsorp mini II analyzer.
General procedure for selective photocatalytic oxidation of aromatic
alcohols to corresponding aldehydes (or corresponding ketones)
The photocatalytic performance of the prepared nanocomposites was
investigated through selective photo-oxidation of aromatic alcohols
with oxygen atmosphere under simulated sunlight. Photocatalytic re-
actions were carried out in transparent pyrex Round-bottom flask with
5.0 cc volume. For each examination, 10.0 mg photocatalyst in 3.0 mL
water containing aromatic alcohol (0.1 mmol) was dispersed by ultra-
sonication. To achieve the adsorption-desorption equilibrium for benzyl
alcohol as a substrate and dissolved O2 molecules on the surface of
photocatalyst, the mixture was stirred in the dark for 30 min. The
photocatalysis reaction was performed under visible light for 8 h, using a
10 W blue LED Floodlight with λ ≥ 400 nm as the light source (distance
of light source from the reaction flask is 15 cm). The suspension tem-
perature was controlled at about 25 ◦C using a cooling water system. The
progress of the reaction was examined by Thin Layer Chromatography
(TLC). After completion of the photocatalytic oxidation, the nano-
composite was separated from the reaction media by using a centrifuge
(10,000 rpm, 10 min) and the reaction solution was then filtered
Synthesis of bulk g-C3N4
The pristine g-C3N4 was prepared through the thermal poly-
condensation of C3H6N6. In an alumina crucible with cover, 10.0 g of
C3H6N6 was poured and it was transferred to a muffle furnace and then
heated at 550 ◦C for 4 h with a heating ramp of 8 ◦C minꢀ 1. The obtained
pale-yellow bulk g-C3N4 sample were grinded into powder using ball
mill, when cooled to room temperature.
Synthesis of I-TiO2/CNNSs nanocomposite
The I-TiO2/CNNSs nanocomposite was fabricated through in situ
solvothermal assisted synthesis procedure. Specifically, a certain
amount of g-C3N4 powder was initially dispersed in 100.0 mL of absolute
ethanol for 2 h in an ultrasonicator. Then, the dispersed solution mixed
through a nylon syringe filter (0.22 μm, 25 mm) to separate the pho-
tocatalyst particles prior to HPLC analysis. Concentration of the sub-
strates and desired products were evaluated by a high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC, Knauer model Smartline Pump 1000/
3