RSC Advances
Communication
Conclusions
In summary, a new method with high selectivity and sensitivity
has been developed based on the incidental hydrolysis reaction
and redox reaction. This method can be easily adopted to other
cyanine-based uorescent dyes to develop different uorescent
probes for other analytes. The present probe possesses an
extremely low detection limit, as low as 26 nM, and displays fast
response by the degree of uorescence recovery. Furthermore,
this probe is also proved useful for the determination of AA in
human urine samples with satisfactory results. We anticipate
that this novel method will be helpful to expand the uores-
cence detection technique for food, pharmaceutical, and blood
analysis, where analysis of redox species like ascorbic acid, as
well as it could be essential for the examination of contents in
food and drug along with the monitoring of human health.
Fig. 3 (A) Fluorescence emission spectra of Cy5-HD (1.0 mM) upon
addition of various concentrations of AA (0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0,
8.0, 9.0, 10.0 mM) and Cu2+ (10.0 mM) one after another in DMSO–PBS
(9 : 1 v/v, 20 mM, pH 7.4). Arrow shows fluorescence enhancement
with increasing concentration of AA. Inset shows fluorescence ratio of
F/F0 as a function of AA concentration. (B) The selectivity of this system
upon addition of 10.0 mM Glu, urea, L-Cys, UA, DA, AA, mix,
respectively.
Cu2+. The detection limit that was taken to be 3 times the
standard derivation of a blank solution, and it was estimated to
be 26 nM. The results suggested that the proposed approach
was potentially appropriate for the quantication of AA in real
samples.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the nancial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (21305036, 21135001 and
J1103312), the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of
NSFC (21221003), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities.
Selectivity is an important property for probe application in
real samples. The selectivity of Cy5-HD was studied by exam-
ining other analogues such as D-glucose (Glu), uric acid (UA),
urea, dopamine (DA) and L-cysteine (Cys). As shown in Fig. 3B,
almost no enhancement was seen in the presence of Glu, UA,
urea, and Cys, even at a high concentration. Though dopamine
Notes and references
1 M. W. Davey, M. V. Montagu, D. Inze, M. Sanmartin,
A. Kanellis, N. Smirnoff, I. Benzie, J. J. Strain, D. Favell and
J. J. Fletcher, J. Sci. Food Agric., 2000, 80, 825–860.
2 M. Levine and D. Downing, J. Nutr. Environ. Med., 1992, 3,
361–362.
can partly deteriorate the hydrolysis of Cy5-HD caused by Cu2+
,
its efficiency was pale compared to that of AA. The results
revealed that this response of Cy5-HD was highly selective
toward AA compared with other interfering agents.
With excellent selectivity and sensitivity in an optimized
condition, the proposed method was employed for AA detection
in urine samples. The samples were voluntarily provided by
healthy people and stored at 4 ꢂC. Before uorescence detec-
tion, samples were centrifuged and diluted 10-fold with a DMSO
solution, and then Cy5-HD and 10.0 eq. Cu2+ were added. The
results are shown in Table 1, which revealed a high consistency
in the determination of AA in urine samples by the proposed
method and the standard colorimetric method using 2,4-dini-
trobenzene hydrazine as substrate,24 demonstrating the excel-
lent performance of this probe in practical applications.
3 A. Bossi, S. A. Piletsky, E. V. Piletska, P. G. Righetti and
A. P. F. Turner, Anal. Chem., 2000, 72, 4296–4300.
4 L. K. Massey, M. Liebman and S. A. Kynast-Gales, J. Nutr.,
2005, 135, 1673–1677.
´
´
´
´
5 L. Novakova, D. Solichova, S. Pavlovicova and P. Solich, J.
Sep. Sci., 2008, 31, 1634–1644.
˘
¨
¨
¨
6 R. Apak, K. Guclu, M. Ozyurek and B. Bekta¸soglu, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 2007, 588, 88–95.
7 Z. Aydogmusx and S. M. Cetin, Turk. J. Chem., 2002, 26, 697–
704.
8 N. Li, Y. Li, Y. Han, W. Pan, T. Zhang and B. Tang, Anal.
Chem., 2014, 86, 3924–3930.
9 H. W. Park, S. M. Alam, S. H. Lee, M. M. Karim,
S. M. Wabaidur, M. Kang and J. H. Choi, Luminescence,
2009, 24, 367–371.
Table 1 Detection of AA in urine samples
Proposed
10 S. Zhao, Y. Huang and Y. M. Liu, J. Chromatogr. A, 2009, 1216,
6746–6751.
Sample
AA added/mM
SM/mM
method/mM
Recovery/%
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
—
—
—
11 N. Inoue, K. Akasaka, H. Arimoto and H. Ohrui, Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem., 2006, 70, 1517–1520.
12 S. Y. Qiu, S. Gao, L. D. Xie, H. Q. Chen, Q. Liu, Z. Y. Lin,
B. Qiu and G. N. Chen, Analyst, 2011, 136, 3962–3966.
13 M. N. Zhang, K. Liu, L. Xiang, Y. Q. Lin, L. Su and L. Q. Mao,
Anal. Chem., 2007, 79, 6559–6565.
0.99 ꢃ 0.5a
1.89 ꢃ 0.16
2.95 ꢃ 0.14
0.95 ꢃ 0.15
2.1 ꢃ 0.25
2.8 ꢃ 0.12
95.0
105.0
93.3
a
Mean ꢃ standard deviation of three determinations. SM indicates the
2,4-dinitrobenzene hydrazine method.
35114 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 35112–35115
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014