Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.3 (2003)
207
were filtered, washed with ethyl acetate–ether (1:1), analyzed by
1
Hosts’’ in ‘‘Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry,’’ ed.
by D. D. MacNicol, F. Toda, and R. Bishop, Pergamon,
Oxford (1996), Vol. 6, p 147.
M. Miyata, M. Shibakami, and K. Takemoto, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1988, 655.
K. Sada, T. Kondo, and M. Miyata, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
6, 2655 (1995).
O. Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, A. Medici, and P.
Pedrini, Chem. Lett., 2000, 1246.
V. Bertolasi, O. Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, A.
Medici, and P. Pedrini, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 12, 1479
(2001).
a) O. Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, A. Medici, and P.
Pedrini, Chem. Commun., 2000, 365. b) V. Bertolasi, O.
Bortolini, G. Fantin, M. Fogagnolo, and A. Medici, Chem.
Lett., 2002, 400.
M. R. Caira, L. R. Nassimbeni, J. L. Scott, and A. F.
Wildervanck, J. Chem. Crystallogr., 26, 117 (1996).
F. Toda, K. Tanaka, M. Yagi, Z. Stein, and I. Goldberg, J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1990, 1215.
J. Backes, in ‘‘Houben-Weyl,’’ 4th ed., ed. by D. Klamann,
Thieme, Stuttgart (1991), Vol. E16, p 31.
H NMR to obtain the host:guest ratio, treated with aqueous
NaHCO3 and extracted with ethyl acetate. The extracts were
analyzed by GC for the ee determination and by polarimetry to
assign the absolute configuration, see Table 1. For resolution on
multigram scale, 5 g of dehydrocholic acid were added to a
solution of 2 (5 g) dissolved in 50 mLof ethyl acetate–ether (1:1).
The crystals were collected by filtration, washed several times
with ethyl acetate–ether and (ꢁ)-2 was recovered, 1 g ca. 42% ee,
2
3
4
5
ꢂ
upon distillation using a Kugelrohr apparatus (150 C, 1 mm Hg).
When the same procedure was repeated on the partially resolved
racemate, (ꢁ)-2 was obtained with an optical yield of 80%. As
expected although not reported in the Table, depending on the
number of cycles, the complete resolution of the substrates is
obtained in all cases except for the N-methyl derivative 3. The
complete set of results, including the two-cycle procedure, is
shown in Table 1.
6
7
8
9
As reported in the second row of the Table the bile acid-to-
amide inclusion ratio is generally 1:1, however some noticeable
differences demonstrate the independence of the steric dimen-
sions of the cyclic amide with respect to the inclusion stoichio-
metry, see for example 2 and 9. The host-guest relationship of the
included molecules is well evident in a comparison between the
FT-IR spectra of the ‘‘free’’ and included amides in KBr. As an
10 K. Drandarov, Tetrahedron Lett., 36, 617 (1995).
11 F. H. Van der Steen and G. van Koten, Tetrahedron, 47, 7503
(1991).
12 R. B. Silverman and S. M. Nanavati, J. Med. Chem., 33, 931
(1990).
13 D. Enders, R. Grobner, G. Raabe, and J. Runsink, Synthesis,
1996, 941.
14 H. D. Doan, J. Gor e´ , and J. M. Vat e` le, Tetrahedron Lett., 40,
6765 (1999).
15 A. I. Meyers and L. Snyder, J. Org. Chem., 58, 36 (1993).
16 J. Aub e´ , M. Hammond, E. Gherardini, and F. Takusagawa, J.
Org. Chem., 56, 499 (1991).
17 J. Aub e´ , Y. Wang, M. Hammond, M. Tanol, F. Takusagawa,
and D. V. Velde, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 4879 (1990).
ꢁ
1
example 2 gives rise to a broad signal, centered at 3201 cm
ascribable to an intermolecular N–H stretching. The same signal
,
ꢁ
1
resolved in a sharp band at 3354 cm upon inclusion in the host.
Worthy of note are the results obtained with the five-
membered amide 2 if compared with the N-methyl homologue 3.
Both derivatives include within the dehydrocholic acid in a one-
to-one ratio, however only 2 showed enantioselective incorpora-
tion in the host, thus suggesting a possible role played by the N–H
function on the enantiodiscrimination.
We are currently extending this readily accessible and low
cost methodology to the resolution of other classes of ‘‘neutral’’
organic molecules.
1
8 S. B. Davies and M. A. McKervey, Tetrahedron Lett., 40,
1229 (1999).
References and Notes
1
M. Miyata and K. Sada, ‘‘Deoxycholic Acis and Related