IMAGE ANALYSIS IN THYROID FOLLICULAR NEOPLASMS
945
TABLE 5. PROLIFERATION INDEX AND NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRY
IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT THYROID FOLLICULAR NEOPLASMS
8. Tuttle RM, Lemar H, Burch HB 1998 Clinical Features asso-
ciated with an increased risk of thyroid malignancy in pa-
tients with follicular neoplasia by fine needle aspiration.
Thyroid 8:377–383.
Follicular neoplasms
9
. Gardner HAR, Ducatman BS, Wang HH 1993 Predictive
Benign
Malignant
value of fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid in the classifi-
cation of follicular lesions. Cancer 71:2598–27603.
0. Lin JD, Hsueh C, Chao TC, Weng HF, Huan BY 1997 Thy-
roid follicular neoplasms diagnosed by high resolution ul-
trasonography with fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta
Cytol 41:687–691.
1. Tyler DS, Winchester DJ, Caraway NP, Hickey RC, Evans
DB 1994 Indeterminate fine needle aspiration biopsy of the
thyroid: identification of subgroups at high risk for invasive
carcinoma. Surgery 116:1054–1060.
(
n 5 42)
(n 5 16)
1
1
PI (%; mean 6 SD)
7.18 6 6.14
76.17 6 24.52
20.14 6 5.92
3.17 6 1.01
12.13 6 5.51a
83.84 6 19.21
25.64 6 7.17a
3.46 6 0.77
2
NA (mm , mean 6 SD)
NACV (%, mean 6 SD)
AR (AU, mean 6 SD)
ap , 0.01.
PI, proliferation index; NA, nuclear area; NACV, nuclear area
coefficient of variation; AR, anisocariosis ratio; SD, standard devia-
tion; AU, arbitrary units.
12. Schlinkert RT, van Heerden JA, Goellner JR, Gharib H, Smith
SL, Rosales RF, Weaver AL 1997 Factors that predict malig-
nant thyroid lesions with fine-needle aspirations is “suspi-
cious for follicular neoplasm.” Mayo Clin Proc 72:913–916.
dergoing malignant transformation (13,14,21). In our series, 13. Lukacs GL, Balasz GY, Zs-Nagy I 1979 Cytofluorimetric
the finding of an aneuploid monoclonal pattern applied to
many benign follicular lesions; nevertheless, the heteroclonal
measurements of the DNA contents of tumor cells in human
thyroid gland. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 95:265–271.
aneuploid DNA histogram was prevalent in thyroid malig- 14. Greenebaum E, Koss LGL, Elequin F, Silver CE 1985 The di-
nancies. In agreement with previous observations (21), ma-
lignant follicular neoplasms showed increased PI levels.
Many studies report that an increased nuclear diameter is a
feature of thyroid malignancy (28,24–26,27). However, this
finding has not been confirmed in our and other studies
agnostic value of flow cytometric DNA measurement in fol-
licular tumor of the thyroid gland. Cancer 56:2011–2018.
5. Joensuu H, Klemi P, Eerola E 1986 DNA aneuploidy in fol-
licular adenomas of the thyroid gland. Am J Pathol 1243:
1
1
3
73–376.
6. Hruban RH, Huvos AG, Traganos F, Reuter V, Lieberman
PH, Melamed MR 1990 Follicular neoplasms of the thyroid
in men older than 50 years of age: a DNA flow cytometric
study. Am J Clin Pathol 94:527–532.
7. Grant CS, Hay ID, Ryan JJ, Bergstrahl EJ, Rainwater LM,
Goellner JR 1990 Diagnostic and prognostic utility of flow
cytometric DNA measurements in follicular thyroid tumors.
World J Surg 14:283–289.
(
20,28). Instead, we observed a wider range of variation of
nuclear size (NACV) in malignant follicular lesions. This re-
sult is in good agreement with a recent report showing a
good (85%) NACV sensitivity in the detection of malignant
thyroid follicular lesions (20). Altogether, risk of malignancy
turned out to be about 10-fold higher in follicular lesions
with suspicious features at image analysis.
In conclusion, computer-assisted ploidy analysis and nu-
clear morphometry applied to fine-needle aspirates should
be considered a valuable technique that may help in the clin-
ical management of thyroid follicular neoplasms.
1
1
1
8. Kashyap V, Kaushik N, Bhambhani S, Das DK, Luthra UK
1
992 Supportive role of image analysis and DNA ploidy pat-
tern. Diagnostic Cytopathology 8:228–230.
9. Zacks JF, De Las Morenas A, Beazley RM, O’Brien MJ 1998
Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of colloid nodule
versus follicular variant of papillary carcinoma of thyroid.
Diagn Cytopathol 18:87–90.
References
1
. Lowhagen T, Willems JS, Lundell G, Sunblad R, Granberg 20. Nagashima T, Suzuki M, Oshida M, Hashimoto H, Yagata
PO 1981 Aspiration biopsy cytology in diagnosis of thyroid
cancer. World J Surg 5:61–73.
. Silverman JF, West RL, Larkin EW, Park HK, Finley JL,
H, Shishikura T, Koda K, Nakajima N 1998 Morphometry
in the cytologic evaluation of thyroid follicular lesion. Can-
cer Cytopathol 84:115–118.
2
Swanson MS, Fore WW 1986 The role of fine needle aspira- 21. Salmon I, Gasperin P, Remmelink M, Rahier I, Rocmans P,
tion biopsy in the rapid diagnosis and management of thy-
roid neoplasm. Cancer 57:1164–1170.
. Hall TL, Layfield LJ, Philippe A, Rosenthal DL 1989 Sources
of diagnostic error in fine needle aspiration of the thyroid.
Pateels JL, Heimann R, Kiss R 1993 Ploidy level and prolif-
erative activity measurements in a series of 407 thyroid tu-
mors or other pathologic conditions. Hum Pathol 24:912–
920.
3
Cancer 63:718–725.
22. Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI (eds.) 1988 Med-
4. Gharib H 1994 Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nod-
ical Decision Making. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
ules: advantages, limitations and effects. Mayo Clin Proc 69: 23. Logani S, Gupta PK, LiVolsi VA, Mandel S, Baloch ZW 2000
4
4–49.
. Oertel YC 1996 Fine needle aspiration and the diagnosis of
thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 25:69–91.
Thyroid nodules with FNA cytology suspicious for follicu-
lar variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Follow-up and
management. Diagn Cytopathol 23:380–385.
5
6
. Lowhagen T, Sprenger E 1974 Cytologic presentation of thy- 24. Boon ME, Lowhagen T, Willems JS 1980 Planimetric studies
roid tumors in aspiration biopsy smear. A review of 60 cases.
on fine needle aspirates from follicular adenoma and follic-
Acta Cytol 18:192–198.
ular carcinoma of the thyroid. Acta Cytol 27:145–148.
7
. Hamburger JL, Kaplan MM 1996 Evaluation of thyroid nod- 25. Kini SR, Miller JM, Hamberger JI 1985 Cytopathology of fol-
ules by needle biopsy. In: Braverman LE, Utiger RD (eds) The
licular lesions of the thyroid. Diagn Cytopathol 1:123–132.
Thyroid. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia-New York, p 447. 26. Suen KC 1988 How does one separate cellular follicular le-