10.1002/asia.201601196
Chemistry - An Asian Journal
FULL PAPER
Synthesis of the hierarchically yolk-shell Fe3O4@nickel silicate
nanocomposites
desorption branch of the isotherms. Magnetic properties of the samples
were measured with a Lake Shore-7407 vibrating sample magnetometer.
The contents of Ni species and Fe species in Fe@SiO2/Ni
nanocomposites were determined using an AGILENT-725 inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES). The time-
dependent absorption spectra of nitroaromatic compounds during
The Fe3O4@nickel silicate nanocomposites were synthesized combining
an improved protocol.[31] Typically, to the aqueous suspension (40 mL)
containing Fe3O4@SiO2 (0.1 g) were added urea (1 g) and of
Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.18 g) under vigorous ultrasonication, and then the
homogenous mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless-steel
autoclave. After reacting at 105 oC for 12 h, the autoclave was cooled to
room temperature. Finally, the product was magnetically separated,
rinsed with deionized water and anhydrous ethanol several times, and
then dried at 60 oC for 12 h.
catalytic reduction were obtained with
spectrophotometer.
a
Shimadzu UV 2550
Acknowledgements
This study has been supported by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (51503178), Natural Science Foundation of
Hebei Province (E2015203114), China Postdoctoral Science
Foundation (2015M571278), Postdoctoral Science Foundation
of Hebei Province (B2014003009), Science and Technology
Project of Higher Education in Hebei Province (QN2016001),
Independent Research Project of Yanshan University for Young
Teachers (14LGB019), and the Doctor Foundation of Yanshan
University (B789).
Synthesis of the hierarchically yolk-shell Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocomposites
The Fe3O4@ nickel silicate nanocomposites placed in a quartz boat were
heated to 550 oC at a rate of 10 oC/min in Argon atmosphere and
reduced at 550 oC for 3 h in H2 current. After being cooled to room
temperature in Argon atmosphere, the final products were collected.
Catalytic reduction of nitroaromatic compounds by the hierarchically yolk-
shell Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocomposites
Keywords:
Ni nanoparticles •
self-templating reduction
Catalytic performances of Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocomposites were
investigated by the reduction of nitroaromatic compounds including 4-NA,
•
yolk-shell • nanostructures • supported catalysts
2-NA, 4-NP, 2-NP and 2-Amino-5-nitrophenol using NaBH4 as
a
[1]
[2]
R. Schwarzenbach, R. Stierli, K. Lanz, J. Zeyer, Environ. Sci. Technol.
1990, 24, 566-1574.
reductant. Typically, the suspension of the Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocatalyst (0.1
mL, 0.1 wt%) was added into a 5 mM 4-NA solution in ethanol (2 mL) .
After the rapid addition, a 0.2 M fresh NaBH4 aqueous solution (20mL),
the reaction mixture was monitored using the UV/Vis spectroscopy at 3-
min intervals until the mixture became colorless. Catalytic reduction of
other nitroaromatic compounds were performed in the similar process to
catalytic reduction of 4-NA.
H. Blaser, C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, H. Steiner, M. Studer, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 103-151.
[3]
[4]
H. Blaser, H. Steiner, M. Studer, ChemCatChem 2009, 1, 210-221.
J. Wang, D. Ge, X. Cao, M. Tang, Y. Pan, H. Gu, Chem. Commun.
2015, 51, 9216-9219.G.
[5]
[6]
[7]
G. Chen, C. Xu, X. Huang, J. Ye, L. Gu, G. Li, Z. Tang, B. Wu, H. Yang,
Z. Zhao, Z. Zhou, G. Fu, N. Zheng, Nature Mater. 2016, 15, 564-569.
H. Hu, J. Xin, H. Hu, X. Wang, D. Miao, Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A 2015,
3, 11157-11182.
To evaluate the magnetically recyclable stability of the hierarchical
Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocatalyst, a 5 mM 4-NA solution in ethanol (2 mL) and a
dispersion of Fe@SiO2/Ni nanocatalyst in ethanol (1 mL, 0.1%) were
mixture, followed by the addition of a 0.2 M fresh NaBH4 solution (20 mL).
After 4 min, the nanocatalyst was magnetically recovered and rinsed by
ethanol three times for the next catalysis of 4-NA. The similar process
repeated over ten runs. The catalyst-removing reaction solution after
each catalytic cycle was monitored by UV-vis spectroscopy to determine
the conversion of 4-NA.
G. Vilé, D. Albani, N. Almora-Barrios, N. López, J. Pérez-Ramírez,
ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 21-33.
[8]
[9]
C. Hsia, M. Madasu, M. Huang, Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3073-3079.
J. Sonnenberg, N. Coombs, P. Dube, R. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134, 5893-5899.
[10] Ö. Metin, V. Mazumder, S. Özka, S. Sun, J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
1468-1469.
[11] R. Rai, A. Mahata, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Gupta, P. Li, K. Nguyen, Y.
Zhao, B. Pathak, S. Singh, Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 2904-2909.
[12] C. Castillo, K. Sequin, P. Aquirre, D. Veneqas-Yaziqi, A. Vieqas, E.
Spodine, V. Paredes-Garcia, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 63073-63079.
[13] T. Upadhya, S. Katdare, D. Sabde, V. Ramaswamy, A. Sudalai, Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1119-1120.
Characterization
[14] S. Mohapatra, S. Sonavane, R. Jayaram, P. Selvam, Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
4297-4300.
SEM, TEM and HRTEM images of the samples were acquired using a
Zeiss SUPRA55 schottky field emission scanning electron microscope, a
HITACHI HT7700 electron microscope at 100 kV, and a JEM-2010
electron microscope operated at 200 kV with an EDX analyzer,
respectively. The crystal structures of the samples were determined
using a RIGKU SmartLab X-ray diffractometer with Cukα radiation
(λ=0.15418 nm) at 40 kV. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface
areas and Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77.3 K were
determined using a Quantachrome Autosorb 1 apparatus, and the pore
size distributions of the nanomaterials were measured according to the
[15] Y. Du, H. Chen, R. Chen, N. Xu, Appl. Catal. A 2004, 277, 259-264.
[16] F. Alonso, P. Riente, M. Yus, Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 379-391.
[17] V. Polshettiwar, B. Baruwati, R. Varma, Green Chem. 2009, 11, 127-
131.
[18] M. Gawande, A. Rathi, P. Branco, I. Nogueira, A. Velhinho, J.
Shrikhande, U. Indulkar, R. Jayaram, C. Ghumman, N. Bundaleski, O.
Teodoro, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 12628-12632.
[19] W. Liu, K. Tian, H. Jiang, Green Chem. 2015, 17, 821-826.
[20] M. Nabid, Y. Bide, M. Niknezhad, ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 538-546.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.