10.1002/anie.201802087
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
new iron species with parameters δ = 0.64 mm/s and ΔEQ = 1.27
mm/s (15% of total iron, blue component) which, from reactivity
studies (vide infra), is assigned to an under-transmetallated iron
complex that forms prior to the major iron species (Figure 4). The
10 K EPR spectrum indicates minor contributions from a S = 3/2
species (~ 3 %) and a S = 1/2 cluster (Figure 1B, inset).
Spectroscopic investigations of the in-situ generated iron
species indicated a limited window of thermal stability at 23 °C (t
~ 3 min) before iron species associated with decomposition were
formed (Figure S2). Thus, efforts were directed toward isolating
the major iron species. The treatment of a red solution containing
Fe(acac)3 and 9 equiv of NMP in THF with 5 equiv of MeMgBr at
-5 °C provided a yellow colored solution. Rapid cooling of the
solution to -80 °C (to disfavor decomposition) followed by layering
with diethyl ether rendered large pale-yellow crystals. A single
crystal X-ray diffraction study (XRD) revealed three independent
instances of [Mg(NMP)6][FeMe3]2, 1, in the asymmetric unit in
general positions, with the cations and anions well separated
(Figure 2A). Although the crystals diffracted very weakly,
precluding a detailed discussion of the structural parameters, the
overall connectivity, geometry, and chemical formulation of this
species are unambiguous. Notably, the magnesium ion is
coordinated through the carbonyl oxygens of the six NMP
molecules (Note: NMP O-coordination mode for a magnesium ion
and other metals has been previously reported[6f, 7-8]) and no NMP
coordination to iron is present. A previous report showed similar
effects of co-solvent on iron speciation in which ligation of
tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) to magnesium cations in
homoleptic triaryl-ferrate complexes was observed.[9]
Figure 3. Calculated molecular orbital energy diagram for 1.
To date, very few examples of homoleptic alkyl- and aryl-
iron complexes devoid of stabilizing ligands exist in the
literature.[8] The first example incorporating methyl ligands was
reported by Fürstner in which a distorted tetrahedral homoleptic
tetramethyliron(II) ferrate complex, [(Me4Fe)(MeLi)][Li(OEt2)]2,
was identified.[10] This inspired later studies from Neidig and
coworkers in which a distorted square-planar tetramethyliron(III)
ferrate, [MgCl(THF)5][FeMe4], was identified.[11] The unique
coordination geometry of the iron species was determined to be
strongly influenced by the choice of solvent and cation. This
assertion is further supported by the generation of 1 instead of
[Fe8Me12]- when utilizing NMP as a co-solvent demonstrating the
powerful effect of NMP coordination to cations versus other
solvents. Both Bedford and Fürstner have independently reported
the isolation of triaryl-ferrate complexes which are reactive with
electrophile, but unlike 1 lack high selectivity in producing cross-
coupled product.[9, 12]
electronic structure and bonding of this novel low-coordinate iron
(II) species. The PBE0 functional and def2-TZVP basis set were
employed to yield calculated structures for the S = 2 system which
are in good agreement with crystallographic data in both the gas
phase and THF solvent models (see SI). Additionally,
B3LYP/TZVP was used to evaluate the molecular orbitals (see SI).
The ground-state electronic structure can be described by
examination of the frontier molecular orbitals of the β-manifold
(Figure 3), which shows the highest occupied (β25) and the four
lowest unoccupied MOs (β26, β27, β28 and β29) with significant
d-orbital character. Strong Fe s-orbital character is also present
in β26 and modest antibonding interactions are observed
between the methyl carbon atoms in β26, β28, and β29.
In order to understand the role of 1 in cross-coupling,
reactions of 1 with sub-stoichiometric amounts of electrophile, b-
bromostyrene, were tracked by 80 K 57Fe Mössbauer, with
concurrent reaction aliquots quenched to determine product
yields by gas chromatography (GC). These experiments
demonstrate that 1 is consumed within 10 s in the presence of
While
1
represents an interesting, three-coordinate
homoleptic iron-methyl structure, spectroscopic characterization
of 1 in solution was necessary to verify its identity as the major
iron species formed under catalytically relevant conditions. The 5
K, 7 T NIR MCD spectrum of 1 in solution (Figure 2C), prepared
from dissolution of crystals of 1 in 1:1 THF:2-MeTHF at -80 °C to
prevent thermal decomposition, is consistent with the analogous
spectrum (Figure 1C) of the iron species generated from reaction
of Fe(acac)3 with 20 equiv of MeMgBr in 180 equiv of NMP.
Saturation magnetization data collected at 10846 cm-1 is well-fit
to S = 2 positive zero-field split (+ZFS) non-Kramers doublet
model with ground-state spin Hamiltonian parameters of D = 13 ±
3 cm-1, |E/D| = 0.07 ± 0.03 with giso = 2.20 ± 0.10 (Figure 2D).
Additionally, the solid 80 K 57Fe Mössbauer spectrum of crystals
of 1 (Figure 2B) yields identical parameters (δ = 0.25 mm/s and
ΔEQ = 1.36 mm/s, green component) to those obtained from in-
situ reaction of Fe(acac)3 with MeMgBr in the presence of NMP
(Figure 1A). Together, this data demonstrates that 1 is the major
iron species formed in-situ under the catalytic conditions
previously reported by Cahiez when using NMP as an additive.
Spin-unrestricted DFT calculations were performed on 1
with a focus on the ferrous trimethyl anion subunit, excluding the
[Mg(NMP)6]2+ dication in order to gain further insight into the
electrophile to generate exclusively cross-coupled product (kobs
>
6 min-1, Table 1 and Figure 4). Furthermore, the minor iron side-
products (S = 3/2 species and iron cluster (S = 1/2)), monitored
by EPR, remain unchanged when reacted with sub-stoichiometric
amounts of electrophile suggesting they are unreactive or less
reactive than 1 (Figure S3). While the iron products formed upon
reaction with electrophile could not be isolated, it was
demonstrated that the addition of 1 equiv of MeMgBr leads to
rapid regeneration of 1 (Figure 4D) suggesting that these are
under-transmetallated iron species (blue and brown
components). These results indicate that 1 is a very reactive
species for the productive formation of cross-coupled product.
Importantly, unlike [Fe8Me12]- which has been implicated as
the major reactive species in Kochi’s catalysis, 1 reacts with
electrophile without the requirement of an additional equivalent of
MeMgBr to produce cross-coupled product.[3] From reactivity
studies it appears that
1 produces less reactive under-
transmetallated iron species (Figure 4), whereas [Fe8Me12]-
generates an intermediate iron species intimately associated with
electrophile which was apparent from the disappearance of its S
= 1/2 EPR signal and the lack of formation of cross-coupled
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.