G Model
CCLET-2544; No. of Pages 3
2
H.-Y. Guo et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
O
O
NaN3
Cl
N3
O
O
DMF
NHNH2
O
O
1
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
OH
O
O
*
S
Br *
K CO3
S
NH NH
O
1
2
2
*
*
*
S
*
*
S
4
4
*
2
4
93%
8
2%
4
86%
2
3
H N
6
2
H
N
H N
OH
2
OH
9
1%
HO
H
O
81%
N
NH OH
O
N
O
N
N
H
N
O
N
*
S
*
*
S
4
*
4
4
5
Scheme 1. The synthetic routes for title compounds.
À5
Pedersen’s procedure [19]. A 10 mL of 2.0 Â 10 mol/L aqueous
84 120 16 12 4
C H N O S : C 60.27, H 7.23, N 13.39; found C 60.21, H 7.28, N
À3
1
solution of dye and 10 mL of 1.0 Â 10 mol/L solution of carrier in
13.33. 6: Mp: 225–228 8C; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
36H, CH ), 2.25 (bs, 8H, NH ), 4.99 (s, 8H, NCH CO), 5.07 (s, 8H,
OCH ), 7.41 (s, 8H, ArH), 8.11 (s, 4H, CH 55 N), 8.26 (s, 4H, NH); IR
(KBr, cm ):
100). Anal. Calcd. for C60
3
): d 1.01 (s,
CH
2
Cl
2
were vigorously agitated in a stoppered glass tube with a
3
2
2
mechanical shaker for 2 min. Then the mixture was stirred
magnetically in a thermostated water-bath at 25 8C for 1 h, and
was finally left standing for an additional 30 min. The concentra-
tion of the dyes remaining in the aqueous phase was subsequently
determined by UV–vis analyses. Blank experiments showed that
dye extraction were less than 2% in the absence of extractants. The
2
À1
+
n
3407 (NH), 1668 (C 55 O); MS m/z (%): 1355.2(M+Na ,
: C 54.04, H 5.73, N 21.02;
76 20 8 4
H N O S
found C 54.09, H 5.78, N 21.08.
3. Results and discussion
percent extraction (E%) was calculated as: E% = 100 (A
0
À A)/A
0
.
Where A and A are initial and final concentrations of the dyes
0
The synthetic route is shown in Scheme 1. Alkynylthiacalix[4]-
arene 2 and its triazolyl derivative 3 were prepared by a click
reaction according to the literature procedures [17,18]. Then by
ammonolysis of compound 3 with ethanolamine, leucinol and
hydrazine hydrate, the target novel thiacalix[4]arene derivatives 4,
5 and 6 were obtained in yields of 80%–93%, respectively. The
structures of compounds 4, 5 and 6 were characterized by
elemental analysis, IR, ESI-MS, and NMR spectroscopy. Their IR
spectra showed the corresponding amide groups (NHC 55 O) instead
of ester groups (OC 55 O). Their ESI-MS spectra exhibited the
before and after the extraction, respectively. Each experiment was
repeated three times. The dye concentration in the receiving phase
was reported as the mean of the determination and the relative
standard deviation from the mean was less than 5%.
Synthesis of novel thiacalix[4]arene derivatives with triazolyl
and hydrogen bonding groups 4, 5 and 6: Under nitrogen
atmosphere, a mixture of compound 3 (0.21 g, 0.15 mmol) and
ethanolamine (0.2 g, 3.3 mmol) was refluxed in a 20 mL of EtOH/
CHCl
distilled under reduced pressure. The residue was recrystallized in
MeOH/H O (v:v = 1:1) to afford 4 as a white solid (0.22 g, 91%). 4:
Mp: 208–211 8C; H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d d 0.98 (s, 36H,
3
(v:v = 1:1) solution for 10 h. After cooling, the solution was
+
1
corresponding molecular base peaks (M+Na ). In their H NMR
spectra, one singlet for the tert-butyl groups, one singlet for the
aromatic protons, indicated 4, 5 and 6 were in the cone or 1,3-
alternate conformation. The analysis of structures of compounds
2
1
6
):
), 3.32 (s, 4H, 4 Â OH),
CO), 5.08 (s,
1
3
8
4
1
6
2 Â CH
3
), 3.19 (d, 8H, J = 5.6 Hz, 4 Â CH
2
.46 (d, 8H, J = 5.6 Hz, 4 Â CH
2
), 4.97 (s, 8H, 4 Â NCH
2
4–6 suggested they possessed a flexible cavity, four p-triazole
H, 4 Â OCH
2
), 7.47(s, 8H, 8 Â ArH), 8.14 (s, 4H, 4 Â CH 55 N), 8.33 (s,
rings and several NH and OH groups, which were favorable for
binding dyes. Thus, six normal dyes were chosen to test their
extraction ability by liquid–liquid extraction. The results are
shown in Table 1.
Previously, it was reported that the cavity of calix[4]arene was
not favorable for inclusion of dyes [11–16]. However, from Table 1,
it could be seen that compound 2 showed a certain level of
extraction ability for dyes, which could be attributed to its flexible
cavity for dye complexation as expected. Moreover, the extraction
percentage of compound 3 was higher than that of compound 2,
À1
H, 4 Â NH); IR (KBr, cm ):
n 3412 (NH), 1680 (C 55 O); MS m/z (%):
+
471.7 (M+Na , 100). Anal. Calcd. for C68
.12, N 15.46; found C 56.38, H 6.16, N 15.41.
Using a similar procedure, compounds 5 and 6 were obtained by
88 16 12 4
H N O S : C 56.34, H
ammonolysis with leucinol and hydrazine hydrate in yields of 81%
1
and 93%, respectively. 5: Mp: 201–203 8C; H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl
1
3
):
.35–1.38 (m, 8H, 4 Â CH
), 4.04 (s, 4H, 4 Â OH), 5.14 (s, 8H, 4 Â NCH
.18 (s, 8H, 4 Â OCH ), 6.82 (d, 4H, J = 8.4 Hz, 4 Â NH), 7.0 (s, 8H,
 CH 55 N), 7.16 (s, 4H, 4  ArH); IR (KBr, cm ):
d
0.92 (d, 24H, J = 6.8 Hz, 8 Â CH
), 1.51–1.69 (m, 4H, 4 Â CH), 3.52–3.77
CO),
3
), 1.04 (s, 36H, 12 Â CH
3
),
2
(
5
8
m, 12H, 6 Â CH
2
2
2
increased from 30% to 60%. These results suggested the p-triazole
rings in compound 3 produced more favorable interactions for dye
complexation. Further, after bridging with NH and OH groups, the
À1
n
3380 (NH and
+
OH), 1675 (C 55 O); MS m/z (%): 1696.8 (M+Na , 100). Anal. Calcd. for