1436 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 6, 1996
Koptyug et al.
Several experiments described in the literature are designed
to exclude the interference of spectral diffusion to a certain
extent. The most reliable results are probably obtained with a
long-pulse saturation-recovery technique,12,13,15-17 in which a
long saturating mw pulse allows the spin system to reach a
steady state during the preparation period. This leads to a more
uniform initial perturbation of a spectrum, which results in a
substantial quenching of spectral diffusion. Alternatively, a
sequence of short intense pulses and delays can be used for the
same purpose.15,18 Also, only the latter portions of the recovery
traces are often measured16,19 and low concentrations of radicals
are used to further reduce the influence of spectral diffusion.
However, even if a spin system is allowed to achieve a steady
state under saturating mw field, a factor of 1.5-2 difference in
the true and apparent relaxation times is still possible,11 since
under selective mw pumping the steady state does not neces-
sarily correspond to a uniform perturbation. The largest errors
are expected when the rates of the spin-lattice relaxation and
spectral diffusion are comparable.11,20,21
An alternative approach to measuring spin-lattice relaxation
times is a short-pulse saturation-recovery with (in general) a
multiexponential fitting of the experimental recovery traces.22-25
However, it is usually preferable to deal with single exponential
traces, since in many cases the result of a multiexponential fitting
of data with the limited signal-to-noise ratio is much less
reliable.26 A different but related experimental technique
employed in T1 measurements is a pulsed electron-electron
double resonance (ELDOR) experiment,13,20,23,24,27 in which an
evolution of a given ESR line is monitored after a pulsed
perturbation (e.g., inversion) of a second ESR line takes place
at a different mw frequency. The resulting traces are described
by a sum of at least two exponentials, and a least-squares fitting
yields the rates of both the true and competing pseudo-secular
relaxation processes. Under conditions when the rate of spectral
diffusion is smaller than the spin-lattice relaxation rate,
however, the ELDOR signal is weak, and a successful imple-
mentation of this technique is not possible.14 Spin-lattice
relaxation time measurements by other experimental techniques,
such as cw28,29 or pulsed30 longitudinally detected ESR
(LODESR), and stimulated (3-pulse) spin echo,15,31 are affected
by spectral diffusion and thus do not yield the true T1 time in
the case of a non-uniform spectral coverage of the mw pulses.
Thus each of the available techniques requires a certain
relation of the rates of spectral diffusion and spin-lattice
relaxation (faster, slower, or comparable) for its successful
Scheme 1. Chemical Structures of the Nitroxide Radicals
application. In this work we aimed at developing an experi-
mental procedure free from the interference of spectral diffusion
in a wide range of experimental conditions, irrespective of the
relative rates of spectral diffusion and spin-lattice relaxation.
It is also desirable that a single experiment provides all the
necessary data, and that the true T1 time is evaluated while fitting
single-exponential recovery traces, with the latter obtained with
minimum or no data manipulation. Since a development of such
an experiment for a general case would be unrealistic, we limit
ourselves to the case of motionally narrowed ESR spectra of
stable nitroxide radicals exhibiting a well-resolved three-line
pattern.
We implement and compare two different approaches to
exclude the influence of spectral diffusion on the observed
recovery traces. Both are based on modifications of a conven-
tional pulsed inversion-recovery scheme. In the first approach
it is the preparation period of an experiment which is modified.
In this case the goal is to achieve a more uniform initial
perturbation of an ESR spectrum under study. We will
demonstrate that for the case of motionally narrowed ESR
spectra of nitroxide spin lables a uniform inversion of all three
ESR lines can be achieved with specially designed pulse trains.
We refer to this experiment as RUP (recovery after uniform
perturbation). Another possible approach, however, is to modify
the detection part of the relaxation-measurement pulse experi-
ment so that it becomes insensitive to pseudo-secular processes
even in the case of a non-uniform perturbation. Here we take
advantage of the fact that these latter processes only redistribute
magnetization among different ESR transitions but do not
change the total magnetization of the ensemble of radicals. Thus
reconstructed recovery of the total magnetization (RRTM) is
free from pseudo-secular contributions.
(16) Percival, P. W.; Hyde, J. S. J. Magn. Reson. 1976, 23, 249.
(17) Nakagawa, K.; Candelaria, M. B.; Chik, W. W. C.; Eaton, S. S.;
Eaton, G. R. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 98, 81.
(18) Cheng, C.; Lin, T.-S.; Sloop, D. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1979, 33, 71.
(19) Kusumi, A.; Subczynski, W. K.; Hyde, J. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1982, 79, 1854.
We employ the two modified inversion-recovery experiments
to obtain a concentration dependence of the T1 time for benzene
solution of TEMPONE. The RRTM approach is also used to
study the temperature dependence of T1 time of TEMPONE
and PYTEMPO in both methylcyclohexane (nuclear spin
concentrated solvent) and carbon disulfide (nuclear spin dilute
solvent) to check the possible involvement of the solvent nuclear
spins in the electron spin-lattice relaxation of nitroxide spin
labels. Finally, we show preliminary results of the inversion-
recovery studies of host-guest interactions for three nitroxide
spin labels with CT-DNA and SDS micelles.
(20) Freed, J. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1974, 78, 1155.
(21) Freed, J. H. In Time Domain Electron Spin Resonance; Kevan, L.,
Schwartz, R. N., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1979; pp 31-66.
(22) Yin, J.-J.; Hyde, J. S. Z. Phys. Chem. N.F. 1987, 153, 57.
(23) Yin, J.-J.; Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, M.; Hyde, J. S. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84, 964.
(24) Hyde, J. S.; Feix, J. B. In Biological Magnetic Resonance; Berliner,
L. J., Reuben, J., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York/London, 1989; Vol. 8,
pp 305-337.
(25) Hyde, J. S.; Yin, J.-J.; Feix, J. B.; Hubbell, W. L. Pure Appl. Chem.
1990, 62, 255.
(26) Clayden, N. J.; Hesler, B. D. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 98, 271.
(27) Gorcester, J.; Freed, J. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 4678.
(28) Giordano, M.; Martinelli, M.; Pardi, L.; Santucci, S. Mol. Phys.
1981, 42, 523.
(29) Giordano, M.; Martinelli, M.; Pardi, L.; Santucci, S.; Umeton, C.
J. Magn. Reson. 1985, 64, 47.
(30) Schweiger, A.; Ernst, R. R. J. Magn. Reson. 1988, 77, 512.
(31) Salikhov, K. M.; Semenov, A. G.; Tsvetkov, Y. D. Electron Spin
Echoes and Their Applications; Nauka: Novosibirsk, 1976.
2. Experimental Section
Chemicals and Sample Preparation. The structures of nitroxide
radicals employed in this study are shown in Scheme 1. TEMPO
(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy), TEMPONE (4-oxo-2,2,6,6-tet-
ramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy), 4-amino-TEMPO (4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetra-
methyl-1-piperidinyloxy), PROXYL (3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-
pyrrolidinyloxy), benzene, cyclohexane (spectroscopic grade), carbon
disulfide (HPLC grade), Sephadex G25, Trizma, and NaCl were