G Model
CATTOD-10653; No. of Pages5
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
N. Ishito et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Au L3-edge XAFS measurement, which provides information on
the electronic state and structure of Au species stabilized on the
support. In the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) in
Fig. 1a, the edge energy of Au species on AuCl3-BPy-PMO appeared
at 11,917 eV which corresponds to a trivalent Au species. Because
AuCl3-BPy-PMO and [AuCl2(bpy)]Cl show almost the same spec-
tra, electronic structure of Au atoms in AuCl3-BPy-PMO is the same
as that of trivalent Au species in [AuCl2(bpy)]Cl. This trend was
also observed for extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)
These results show that a similar structure to that of the corre-
sponding homogeneous complex, [AuCl2(bpy)]Cl, is successfully
formed on the surface of BPy-PMO via a BPy group as a chelating
unit as shown in Fig. 1d.
Scheme 1. Formation of Au complex on BPy-PMO.
HAuCl4·4H2O in ethanol. These complexes are easily transformed
to AuNPs by a simple reduction with thermal treatment of the Au
complex-stabilized BPy-PMO with H2. Results of characterization
and catalysis of AuNPs/BPy-PMO are also presented.
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents
HAuCl4·4H2O was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Indus-
tries, Ltd. Other reagents were obtained with the highest grade and
used without further purification.
3.2. Formation of Au nanoparticles on BPy-PMO
We performed thermal reduction of AuCl3-BPy-PMO at 423 K
in H2 to obtain BPy-PMO-supported AuNPs. Fig. 2 shows N2
adsorption-desorption isotherms and non-linear DFT (NLDFT) pore
size distribution curves of bare BPy-PMO and AuNPs/BPy-PMO.
Both bare BPy-PMO and AuNPs/BPy-PMO have type-IV isotherms
with no pronounced hysteresis loops, and this result is typical of
mesoporous materials with small-sized mesopores (Fig. 2a) [28].
NLDFT calculation with the isotherms provides pore size distri-
uniform mesopores of ca. 4.4 nm in diameter (Fig. 2b). While
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area slightly decreased
from 670 to 620 m2 g−1, it is apparent that original mesoporosity
of BPy-PMO retained intact after the formation of Au complex and
subsequent H2 reduction. Fig. 3 shows XRD patterns of bare BPy-
PMO and AuNPs/BPy-PMO in (a) low and (b) high-angle regions.
There is one intense diffraction at 2 = 1.69◦ that can be assigned
to (100) plane of p6 mm symmetry for mesoporous arrangement.
Despite the presence of some diffractions due to periodic structure
of BPy units in high-angle region, there are no signals of Au metal,
suggesting the formation of small nanoparticles undetectable by
XRD measurement. The amount of Au loaded on BPy-PMO was
estimated to be 1.1 wt% by EDX analysis.
As a control experiment, MCM-41-supported Au particle with
the same Au loading was prepared by an impregnation method.
Bare and Au-loaded MCM-41 s were also characterized by N2
adsorption measurement and XRD (Fig. 4). There is no significant
difference in N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Fig. 4a); BET sur-
face area and NLDFT pore diameter of bare MCM-41 are 760 m2 g−1
and 4.5 nm, and those of Au-loaded MCM-41 are 750 m2 g−1 and
4.3 nm. In contrast, new sharp diffractions are clearly observed in
high-angle region of the XRD pattern after gold metal formation
(Fig. 4b). They are assigned to (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222)
planes on the basis of the fcc structure of gold metal. The crystallite
size was determined by the Debye-Scherrer’s equation for the (111)
diffraction to be ca. 38 nm. Aggregation of small AuNPs formed
inside mesopores preferably occurred to form large-sized AuNPs on
the outer surface of MCM-41 particles even though Au cations were
homogeneously immobilized on the silica surface before thermal
reduction. This phenomenon can be induced by weak interaction
of AuNPs with silica surface. It should be noted that these large Au
2.2. Synthesis of BPy-PMO supported AuNPs
BPy-PMO was synthesized using 5,5ꢀ-bis(triisopropoxysilyl)-
2,2ꢀ-bipyridine as a bridged silica precursor and octadecyltrimethy-
lammonium chloride as
a surfactant [24]. An Au complex
immobilized BPy-PMO, denoted AuCl3-BPy-PMO, was prepared
from BPy-PMO and HAuCl4·4H2O as follows: a 100 mg of BPy-PMO
was added to a mixture of EtOH (30 mL) and HAuCl4·4H2O (100 mg,
0.50 mmol) under an Ar atmosphere. After stirring the mixture
under reflux condition for 6 h, the resulting solid was filtered,
washed with excess amounts of EtOH, and dried at 298 K in vacuo
to afford AuCl3-BPy-PMO (110 mg) as a pale yellow powder. The
solid was conducted with thermal reduction in H2 at 423 K for 1 h
to give BPy-PMO-supported AuNPs which is denoted AuNPs/BPy-
PMO. For comparison, an MCM-41-supported AuNPs was prepared
by a conventional impregnation method using HAuCl4·4H2O. After
immobilization of Au species on MCM-41 by vacuum evaporation
at 298 K, the dried sample was also reduced in H2 at 423 K for 1 h to
obtain MCM-41-supported AuNPs (Au/MCM-41). A model complex
for AuCl3-BPy-PMO, [AuCl2(bpy)]Cl, was synthesized according to
a procedure in the literature [27] and purified by recrystallization.
The samples were characterized using UV/Vis diffuse reflectance
spectroscopy (UV/Vis DRS; Jasco, V-650), X-ray fluorescence
spectroscopy (XRF, Shimadzu EDX-720), nitrogen adsorption
(MicrotracBEL Belsorp-mini II), X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku
Ultima IV, Cu K␣), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL
JEM-2100F, 200 kV), and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS,
BL14B2 of SPring-8).
2.3. Oxidation of benzaldehyde with supported AuNPs
A mixture of benzaldehyde (11 mg, 0.1 mmol), catalyst (10 mg),
NaHCO3 (17 mg, 0.2 mmol), and distilled water (5.0 mL) was placed
into a Pyrex vial (20 mL) and stirred at 303 K for 2 h with bubbling
of oxygen gas at a flow rate of 10 mL min−1. After the reaction, the
mixture was analyzed using gas chromatography (GC; Shimadzu
GC-14B, flame ionization detector) with an HR-20 m (0.25 mm
diameter, 30 m long) column. Naphthalene was used as an internal
standard in this experiment.
The formation of AuNPs on BPy-PMO was further evaluated in
more details by UV/Vis DRS and TEM measurements (Fig. 5). A plas-
mon absorption peak derived from AuNPs appeared around 530 nm
in AuNPs/BPy-PMO (Fig. 5a). TEM image of AuNPs/BPy-PMO gives
direct information for AuNPs formation with an average size of
3.8 nm (Fig. 5b) and their homogeneous distribution inside and out-
side of mesopores whereas some large AuNPs in size of 6–8 nm are
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis of Au complex on BPy-PMO
The formation of gold complexes by thermal treatment of BPy-
PMO with HAuCl4·4H2O in ethanol (Scheme 1) was confirmed by
Please cite this article in press as: N. Ishito, et al., Facile formation of gold nanoparticles on periodic mesoporous bipyridine-silica, Catal.