64
G.-Y. Yeap et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 687 (2004) 57–64
temperature. The signals due to the carbonyl, aromatic and
aliphatic carbons were observed in these spectra. The
difference between these two compounds was that there are
six more signals in the 13C spectrum of 16OABCh in
comparison with that in 10OABCh.
the spectroscopic data for 16OABCh which is present in
solution at ambient temperature.
Acknowledgements
As for 10OABCh, the HMQC spectrum (Fig. 5)
confirmed the attachments of different aromatic hydrogens
onto the respective carbons as that discussed in the earlier
part on the 1H–1H homonuclear correlations. From this
figure, the carbon atoms occurred at different chemical
shifts can be assigned. The signals owing to the C35 (or
C37), C34 (or C38), C31 (or C39) and C30 (or C40) atoms
were observed at d ¼ 115:33; 128.71, 126.75 and
130.46 ppm, respectively. A cross peak due to the coupling
between the proton at C4 and a carbon C5 located at
d ¼ 140:13 ppm can be observed. The one-bond 13C–1H
connectivities were well observed for C4, C41, C3 and C6
which cross peaks appeared at d ¼ 38:67; 68.56, 74.92 and
123.16 ppm, respectively.
Authors thank the Universiti Sains Malaysia and the
Malaysian Government for financing this project through
FRGS Grant No. 304/PKIMIA/670032 and IRPA Grant No.
305/PKIMIA/610947.
References
[1] E.B. Kyba, K. Koga, L.R. Sousa, M.G. Siegel, D.J. Cram, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 2692.
[2] M. Newcomb, J.L. Toner, R.C. Helgeson, D.J. Cram, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 101 (1979) 4941.
[3] J.M. Lehn, C. Sirlin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1978) 143.
[4] P.J. Collings, M. Hird, Introduction to Liquid Crystals and Physics,
Taylor and Francis, USA, 1998, pp. 10–112.
The aromatic quaternary carbons in 10OABCh were
established throughout the connectivities between the
carbon and its neighbouring proton by using a long-range
correlations HMBC experiment (Fig. 6). Thus, the long-
range cross peaks of H30 (or H40) with C28
[5] W. Elser, R.D. Ennulat, J. Phys. Chem. 74 (1970) 1545.
[6] J.M. Pochan, H.W. Gibson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1973) 5573.
[7] H.W. Gibson, J.M. Pochan, J. Phys. Chem. 77 (1973) 837.
[8] M. Koden, S. Takenaka, S. Kusabayashi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 55
(1982) 2460.
[9] S. Shinkai, K. Murata, J. Mater. Chem. 8 (1998) 485.
[10] R.D. Ennulat, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 8 (1969) 247.
[11] J.L.W. Pohlmann, W. Elser, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 8 (1969) 427.
[12] F.F. Knapp, H.J. Nicholas, in: J.F. Johnson, R.S. Porter (Eds.), Liquid
Crystals and Ordered Fluids, Plenum Press, New York, 1970, p. 147.
[13] F. Reinitzer, Monatsch Chem. 9 (1888) 421.
(d ¼ 166:38 ppm),
H31
(or
H39)
with
C29
(d ¼ 129:33 ppm) and the methylene protons at C41 with
C36 (d ¼ 159:81 ppm) suggest strongly the positions of
these atoms. The C32 and C33 carbons were assigned via
correlations with H31 (or H39) and H34 (or H38),
respectively. 16OABCh shows similar characteristics as
those discussed for 10OABCh.
[14] J.S. Dave, R.A. Vora, in: J.F. Johnson, R.S. Porter (Eds.), Liquid
Crystals and Ordered Fluids, Plenum Press, New York, 1970, p. 477.
[15] A.A. Yakubov, J. Mol. Struct. 484 (1999) 11.
The signal attributed to C36 correlated to H6 proton. On
the basis of this analysis, the long-range connectivity
through intramolecular interaction between C6 and H37
proton was established even though the C6 atom is far away
from H37. One of the probabilities of having this kind of
interaction is to bring together the atoms into close
proximity. As shown in Fig. 6, the C37, C38, C39 and
C40 are likely to be brought near each other by folding up at
the OyC–O linkage. The observation of non-interaction
between H31 (or H39) and H34 (or H38) as inferred from
2D homonuclear experiments (Table 5) indicates that
biphenyl moeities are not coplanar and this phenomenon
has further supported the molecular structure of 10OABCh
as elucidated from the NOE and ROE relationships and
intramolecular interaction via HMBC for this compound
(Fig. 4). Similar feature can also be inferred from
[16] G.W. Gray, J.W. Goodby, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 37 (1976) 157.
[17] Bruker program 1D WIN-NMR (release 6. 0) and 2D WIN-NMR
(release 6.1)
[18] S.E. Wiberley, S.C. Bunce, W.H. Bauer, Anal. Chem. 32 (1960) 217.
[19] F.S. Parker, Applications of Infrared Spectroscopy in Biochemistry,
Biology and Medicine, Plenum Press, New York, 1971, p. 322.
[20] B. Smith, Infrared Spectral Interpretation, CRC Press, New York,
1999, p. 75.
[21] S. Sudhakar, T. Narasimhaswamy, K.S.V. Srinivasan, Liq. Cryst. 27
(2000) 1525.
[22] J.A. Landgrebe, Theory and Practice in the Organic Laboratory,
Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Drive, CA, 1993, p. 255.
[23] S.R. Salman, S.J. Titinchi, H.S. Abbo, A.A.H. Saeed, Spectrosc. Lett.
23 (1990) 447.
[24] S.R. Salman, R.D. Farrant, J.C. Lindon, Spectrosc. Lett. 24 (1991)
1071.
[25] J.W. Blunt, J.B. Stothers, Org. Magn. Res. 9 (1977) 439.
[26] N.S. Bhacca, L.F. Johnson, J.N. Shoolery, High Resolution NMR
Spectra Catalog, First ed., Varian Associates, USA, 1962.