Scheme 1. S-Chelate-Controlled Alkene Hydoacylation
Table 1. Intermolecular Hydroacylation: Scope of the
Thioacetal-Substituted Aldehyde
a,b
the process, we wished to design a series of aldehyde
substrates that maintained the same stabilizing five-mem-
bered S-chelate yet offered more flexibility for synthetic
elaboration. In this Letter, we document that â-thioacetal-
substituted aldehydes fulfill these requirements.
The synthetic utility of thioacetals is well established; in
particular, they are regularly employed as carbonyl sur-
8
rogates, with a variety of hydrolysis methods available. In
addition, conditions to convert thioacetals directly to alcohols,
carboxylic acids, and alkanes are well-known. â-Thioacetal-
substituted aldehydes were thus attractive compounds to
investigate as hydoacylation substrates. The required alde-
hydes were readily available from a double conjugate
addition of a dithiol to the corresponding ynal or indirectly
via addition to an ynoate followed by reduction.9
,10
Reaction of the simple dithiane- and dithiolane-substituted
propanals with methyl acrylate under the same mild condi-
tions ([Rh(dppe)]ClO
4
, DCE, 50 °C)11 employed for the
methyl sulfide-substituted aldehydes delivered the required
hydroacylation adducts as single regioisomers in good yield
(Table 1, entries 1 and 2). It is interesting to note that methyl
sulfide-substituted propanal delivered the corresponding
methyl acrylate adduct as a 5:1 mixture of linear and
branched regioisomers. We attribute the greater selectivity
observed with the thioacetal-substituted aldehydes to the
increased steric demands around the chelating S-atom.
Having established that â-thioacetals serve as suitable
chelating groups, we explored the range of additional
functionality that could be tolerated in the aldehyde. Simple
alkyl substituents, chloro-alkyl and acetal-protected alcohols
a
Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1.0 equiv), methyl acrylate (5.0 equiv),
b
[
Rh(dppe)]ClO4 (10 mol %), acetone, 50 °C. Catalyst generated in situ
6
from [Rh(dppe)(nbd)]ClO4 and H2. Isolated yields. d Only linear isomers
c
observed.
were all tolerated well, delivering linear adducts in good
yields (entries 3-5). Reactions employing substituted alde-
hydes required longer reaction times to reach completion,
and the aldehyde bearing a phenyl substituent provided too
significant a steric barrier, with no reaction being observed
(entry 6). Finally, the use of a bis-aldehyde allowed a double
hydroacylation to provide the corresponding diketone in
excellent yield (entry 7).
(
5) (a) Suggs, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 640-641. (b) Bendorf,
H. D.; Colella, C. M.; Dixon, E. C.; Marchetti, M.; Matukonis, A. N.;
Musselman, J. D.; Tiley, T. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7031-7034.
(
2
c) Jun, C.-H.; Moon, C. W.; Lee, D.-Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2423-
428. (d) Jun, C. H.; Lee, J. H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 577-587 and
references therein. (e) Bendorf, H. D.; Colella, C. M.; Dixon, E. C.;
Marchetti, M.; Matukonis, A. N.; Musselman, J. D.; Tiley, T. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 7031-7034. (f) Tanaka, M.; Imai, M.; Yamamoto, Y.;
Tanaka, K.; Shimowatari, M.; Nagumo, S.; Kawahara, N.; Suemune, H.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1365-1367. (g) Imai, M.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, K.;
Yamamoto, Y.; Imai-Ogata, N.; Shimowatari, M.; Nagumo, S.; Kawahara,
N.; Suemune, H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1144-1150.
We next explored the scope of the process with respect to
the alkene component; the simple alkyl-substituted aldehyde
was employed as a standard (Table 2). In analogy to the
methyl sulfide-aldehydes, simple acrylates and amides were
accommodated well (entries 1-3). A lower reactivity toward
electronically neutral alkenes such as octene was observed,
with only trace amounts of product being isolated (entry 4).
However, the process was far more tolerant of electronically
(
6) Willis, M. C.; McNally, J. S.; Beswick, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
004, 43, 340-343.
7) Elimination of the methyl sulfide group was possible by simple
treatment with MeOTf and KHCO3.
8) For a review on the applications of 1,3-dithianes in synthesis, see:
Yus, M.; Najera, C.; Foubelo, F. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6147-6212.
9) (a) Gaunt, M. J.; Sneddon, H. F.; Hewitt, P. R.; Orsini, P.; Hook, D.
2
(
(
12
varied alkynes, with both electron-poor (entry 5) and
(
-neutral systems delivering the required adducts in good
yields (entry 6). Significant variation in alkyne structure was
possible, with chloro- and cyano-substituted examples per-
forming well (entries 7 and 8). Interestingly, the cyano-
substituted alkyne delivers exclusively the branched hydro-
acylation adduct, possibly resulting from interaction of the
F.; Ley, S. V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 15-16. (b) Sneddon, H. F.;
Gaunt, M. J.; Ley, S. V. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1147-1150. (c) Kuroda, H.;
Tomita, I.; Endo, T. Synth. Commun. 1996, 26, 1539-1543. (d) Ranu, B.
C.; Bhar, S.; Chakraborti, R. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 7349-7352.
(
10) See Supporting Information for details.
(11) See ref 6 for evaluation of various catalysts and reaction conditions
using the MeS-substituted aldehyde.
2250
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 11, 2005