112
W. Sun et al. / Dyes and Pigments 115 (2015) 110e119
chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether-ethyl acetate
(10:1) as eluent to give red oily liquid (5.0 g, yield: 80%).
2.4. X-ray crystallography
X-ray diffraction data of single crystals of compound L, Zn(S)2L
and Cd(S)2L were collected on a Siemens Smart 1000 CCD diffrac-
tometer. The determination of unit cell parameters and data col-
2.3.3. Synthesis of 10-hexyl-3-[4-(2,6-di-(pyridine-2-yl)pyridine-4-
yl)styryl]-10H- phenothiazine L
lections were performed with MoK
a
radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 Å). Unit
4-(2,20:60,200-terpyridyl-40)-benzyl triphenyl phosphonium bro-
mide 3 was synthesized [25]. t-BuOK (1.3 g, 12.3 mmol) was placed
cell dimensions were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97.
The other non-hydrogen atoms were located in successive differ-
ence Fourier syntheses. The final refinement was performed by
using full-matrix least-squares methods with anisotropic thermal
parameters for non-hydrogen atoms on F2. The hydrogen atoms
were added theoretically and riding on the concerned atoms.
into a dry mortar and milled to very small particles, then (1.0 g,
2
3.14 mmol) and 3 (2.0 g, 3.0 mmol) were added and mixed. The
mixture was milled vigorously for 20 min. After completion of the
reaction (monitored by TLC), the mixture was solved with 100 mL
dichloromethane, washed three times with water, and dried with
anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Then it was filtered and concen-
trated. The resulting solution was dispersed in 100 mL ethanol. The
residual solid was filtered and recrystallized from dichloro-
methane/ethanol (1:1) to give pale yellow crystals of L (1.3 g, yield:
70%). Anal. Calcd. for C41H36N4S: C, 79.87; H, 5.84; N, 9.09%. Found:
C, 79.62; H, 5.76; N, 8.95%. IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3051 (w), 2925(m), 2853
(w), 1583 (s), 1600 (m),1567 (m),1470 (m),1389 (m),1335 (w), 1249
(m), 1189 (m), 962 (s), 792 (m), 745 (m). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
400 MHz) ppm: 0.84 (m, 3H), 1.27 (m, 4H), 1.38 (m, 2H), 1.70 (m,
2H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 6.96 (m, 1H), 7.04 (d, 2H, J ¼ 9.54), 7.19 (m, 2H),
7.25 (d, 1H, J ¼ 15.56), 7.31 (d, 1H, J ¼ 16.06), 7.48 (d, 2H, J ¼ 4.52),
7.55 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, 2H, J ¼ 8.78), 7.96 (d, 2H, J ¼ 7.53), 8.06 (m, 2H)
8.69 (m, 2H), 8.85 (m, 2H),8.90 (m, 2H). MS: m/z (%): 616 (Mþ), 545,
531.
2.5. Computational details
TD-DFT computational studies were performed to elucidate the
electronic structures of the ground state of the compound. Opti-
mizations were carried out with B3LYP [6-31G(d)] without any
symmetry restraints, and the TD-DFT {B3LYP[6-31G(d)]} calcula-
tions were performed on the optimized structure. All calculations,
including optimizations and TD-DFT, were performed with the G03
software [26]. In the calculation of the optical absorption spectrum,
the 25 lowest spin-allowed singletesinglet transitions, up to en-
ergy of about 5 eV, were taken into account.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation and spectroscopic characterization
2.3.4. Synthesis of ZnS/CdS nanocrystals
The synthetic route of L is shown in Scheme 2. Compound L was
synthesized by a solvent free Wittig reaction, which is a facile
Zn(CH3COO)2$2H2O (0.44 g, 2.0 mmol), CH3CSNH2 (0.15 mg,
2.0 mmol) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 0.01 g)
were dissolved in 80 mL of ethanol to form transparent solution.
Then the mixture was refluxed with vigorous stirring for 3 h and a
white turbid solution formed. Finally, the white powders of ZnS
nanocrystals were obtained by subsequent centrifugation and fol-
lowed by washing several times with water and ethanol.
In the same way, CdS nanocrystals were also prepared via
Cd(CH3COO)2$2H2O (0.50 g, 2.0 mmol) and CH3CSNH2 (0.15 g,
2.0 mmol) to afford pale yellow solid eventually.
method to prepare oligomers with extended
p-electron conjuga-
tions. ZnS nanocrystals were synthesized according to reported
methods [19]. Zn(CH3COO)2$2H2O was used to provide the zinc
source, CH3CSNH2 provide the sulfur source and cetyl trimethy-
lammonium bromide (CTAB) was added as surfactant. The M(S)2L
complex was synthesized by a solvothermal process and the MS
nanocrystals were used as optimal precursor, which can simulta-
neously provide both metal and sulfur sources. Here, NaSCN is used
as a mineralizer to improve the crystal quality.
Compound L was characterisized by EA, IR, 1H NMR and Mass
spectra. In the IR spectra, strong bands appear around 1249, 2925
and 2853 cmꢀ1, which can be assigned to vibrations of the 10-
hexyl-PTZ moiety. The bands of 1583, 1470 and 1389 cmꢀ1 for L, can
be assigned to vibrations of the terpyridyl moiety. Meanwhile, the
composition of complex M(S)2L (M ¼ Zn or Cd) was also confirmed.
In IR spectra, the bond at 513 cmꢀ1 for Zn complex and 517 cmꢀ1 for
Cd complex is attributed to the stretching vibrations of ZneS and
CdeS bond, respectively. From 1HNMR spectra of ligand L, it could
be found that the double bond protons display integration corre-
sponding to 2H, centered at 7.25 and 7.31 ppm with J ¼ 15.56 and
16.06 Hz, respectively, which indicate that trans isomer would not
isomerize to a cis isomer at room temperature even after a few days
under visible light.
2.3.5. Synthesis of M(S)2L complexes (M ¼ Zn/Cd)
Zn(S)2L complex: Ligand L (61.8 mg, 0.1 mmol), ZnS nanocrystals
(9.7 mg, 0.1 mmol) and NaSCN (32.4 mg, 0.4 mmol) was solved in
ethanol (14 mL) and DMSO (2 mL), the mixture was sealed in a
20 mL Teflon-lined reactor and heated at 130 ꢂC for 24 h. After
cooling to room temperature, red single crystals were obtained.
Yield: 65%. Anal. Calcd. for C41H36N4S3Zn: C, 66.04; H, 4.83; N,7.52%.
Found: C, 65.79; H, 4.74; N, 7.40%. IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3059 (w), 2922
(w), 2852 (w), 1596 (s), 1573 (m), 1469 (s), 1249 (m), 1188 (m), 1014
(m), 975 (s), 794 (m), 745 (m), 637 (w), 515 (w), 415 (w). 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) ppm: 9.14 (s, 2H), 9.01 (d, 2H, J ¼ 7.3), 8.86 (d,
2H), 8.37 (m, 4H), 7.89 (m, 4H), 7.50 (s, 2H), 7.39 (d, 1H, J ¼ 16.00),
7.32 (d, 1H, J ¼ 16.00), 7.23 (m, 2H), 7.05 (m, 2H), 6.96 (m, 1H), 3.91
(m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.22 (m, 6H), 0.85 (d, 3H).
The Cd(S)2L complex was also prepared similarly to Zn(S)2L via
CdS nanocrystals, L and NaSCN to afford orange-red single crystals.
Yield: 59%. Anal. Calcd. for C41H36N4S3Cd: C, 61.96; H, 4.53; N, 7.05%.
Found: C, 62.07; H, 4.45; N, 6.93%. IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3059 (w), 2922
(w), 2851 (w), 1596 (s), 1574 (m), 1467 (s), 1402 (m), 1247 (m), 1189
(m),1014 (m), 979 (s), 793 (m), 743 (m), 517 (w). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
400 MHz) ppm: 9.08 (s, 3H), 8.78 (d, J ¼ 4.2, 3H), 8.34 (s, 3H), 7.83
(d, 4H), 7.49 (s, 2H),7.33 (d, 1H, J ¼ 18),7.31 (d, 2H, J ¼ 14), 7.20 (m,
3H), 7.05 (m, 2H), 6.96 (m, 1H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 1.25 (m, 6H), 0.85 (m,
2H).
3.2. Crystal structure
The structure of L is shown in Fig. 1. Pale yellow single crystals
suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by slow
evaporation of L solution (CH2Cl2 covered with ethanol) at room
temperature after several days. Data collections and refinements
were listed in Table S1, selected bond distances and angles were
given in Table S2. The center pyridinyl plane (labeled P2) is ar-
ranged with two pyridine planes (P1 and P3) being 8.65ꢂ (P2 and
P1) and 9.32ꢂ (P2 and P3). The result indicates that the terpyridyl