exciplex, whose formation would be exergonic according to the
Rehm–Weller eqn (1)4
DGf (kcal mol21) = 23.06 (ED/D 2 EA/A ) 2 E* (1)
+·
2·
+·
-·
where ED/D and EA/A are the redox potentials of the donor and
acceptor moieties, and E* is the singlet energy of the phenolic
chromophore. Using the excitation energy determined from the
intersection between normalized excitation and emission spec-
tra, together with the reported literature values for the redox
potentials,5 the resulting Gibbs free energy associated with
exciplex formation would be ca. 225 kcal mol21. The emission
spectra were also obtained for solutions of 1 in solvents of
intermediate polarity and in a variety of solvent mixtures. For
instance, using CH2Cl2–CH3CN (9+1, v+v), both the monomer
and the exciplex bands were observed (see trace C, Fig. 1b). As
expected for a charge-transfer exciplex, the position of the
longer wavelength band showed a clear dependence on the
solvent polarity (see Fig. 2 for the Lippert–Mataga plot with the
data obtained in pure solvents).6
Scheme 1
oxyphenol and b-methylstyrene in acetonitrile (5 3 1025
M
each) were studied. The emission spectra consisted of the bands
assignable to the isolated chromophores (either phenolic
maximum at 320 nm, upon excitation at 290 nm, or styrenic
maximum at 310 nm when exciting at 250 nm). However, using
much higher concentrations of the partners (0.1 M), the exciplex
emission at ca. 440 nm was clearly observable.
After determining the photophysical properties of 1, its
preparative photochemistry was also investigated. Irradiation of
1 for 1 h in acetonitrile and benzene, with the Pyrex-filtered
light of a medium pressure Hg lamp resulted in the almost
complete ( > 95%) consumption of the starting material,
accompanied by formation of the six-membered ring compound
2 as the major photoproduct. Minor amounts of the cis-isomer 4
and the five-membered ring product 3 were also obtained in
benzene. These results are summarized in Scheme 1.
As the formation of six-membered ring product 2 is
considered to be an indication for the involvement of intra-
molecular excited state electron transfer,2 detection of a charge-
transfer exciplex is compatible with the preparative photo-
chemistry of 1.
In summary, the intramolecular excited state interaction
between phenol and styrene has been directly observed for the
first time as an exciplex emission. This strongly supports the
previous mechanistic proposals to explain the photochemistry
of bichromophoric cinnamylphenols. Although such interaction
is reported here for a single compound (1), preliminary data in
hand show that other analogues with electron donating
substituents at the phenolic ring [such as 4-methyl, 4,6-di-
methyl- and 4,6-di-tert-butyl-2-(3-phenyl-2-propenyl)phenol]
exhibit similar photophysical and photochemical properties.
Financial support by the DGICYT (PB 97-0339) is gratefully
acknowledged. M. C. J. thanks the European Commision for a
grant (MCFI-1999-00101). F. G. thanks Ministerio de Educa-
ción y Cultura for a grant.
Fig. 2 Solvent polarity dependence of the exciplex emission maxima for 1.
Solvent parameter Df has been calculated as follows: Df = (e 2 1)/(2e + 1)
2 (n2 2 1)/(4n2 + 2) where e is the dielectric constant and n is the refraction
index of the solvent.
The quantum yield of emission at 420 nm was 0.05, and the
lifetime was relatively long (5.1 ns), as compared with the
monomer under the same conditions (1.0 ns). The exciplex
was quenched by oxygen (kq = 4.2 3 1010 M21 s21) and
by tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (kq
=
3.3 3
109 M21 s21). The Stern–Volmer plot for quenching by the
ammonium salt is shown in Fig. 3. Similar salt effects have been
observed for other exciplexes; they have been attributed to
dissociation into radical ions, with the concomitant decrease of
fluorescence.7
Notes and references
1 S. Speiser, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 1953; V. Balzani and F. Scandola,
Supramolecular Photochemistry, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester,
1991; D. Gravel, S. Gauthier, F. Brisse, S. Raymond, M. D’Amboise, P.
Messier, B. Zelent and G. Durocher, Can. J. Chem., 1990, 68, 908; E.
Cotsaris, J. W. Verhoeven and N. S. Hush, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109,
3258.
2 M. C. Jiménez, F. Márquez, M. A. Miranda and R. Tormos, J. Org.
Chem., 1994, 59, 197; M. C. Jiménez, P. Leal, M. A. Miranda and R.
Tormos, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 3243; M. C. Jiménez, M. A. Miranda
and R. Tormos, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 14 729; M. C. Jiménez, M. A.
Miranda and R. Tormos, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 1323; M. C. Jiménez,
P. Leal, M. A. Miranda, J. C. Scaiano and R. Tormos, Tetrahedron, 1998,
54, 4337.
3 M. T. Bosch-Montalvá, L. R. Domingo, M. C. Jiménez, M. A. Miranda
and R. Tormos, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1998, 2175.
4 A. Weller, Z. Phys. Chem., 1982, 133, 93.
5 Eox for 4-methoxyphenol is +0.406 V vs. SCE and Ered of b-
methylstyrene is 22.54 V vs SCE as reported in Technique of
Electroorganic Synthesis, ed. N. L. Weinberg, part 2, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1975.
Fig. 3 Quenching of the exciplex fluorescence for 1 by [Bu4NHSO4] at
different molar concentrations: curve A) 0.0 M; B) 0.02 M, C) 0.03 M, D)
0.04 M, E) 0.05 M, F) 0.06 M, G) 0.07 M.
6 N. Mataga, Adv. Chem. Phys., 1999, 107, 431; The Exciplex, ed. M.
Gordon and W. R. Ware, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
7 B.-W. Zhang, Y. Cao, J.-W. Bai and J.-R. Chen, J. Photochem.
Photobiol., A: Chem., 1997, 106, 169.
All the above data were obtained using 5 3 1025 M solutions
of 1. To check whether the corresponding intermolecular
exciplex is also observable, equimolar mixtures of 4-meth-
1748
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1747–1748