ISSN 0036-0236, Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 52, No. 9, pp. 1459–1463. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2007.
Original Russian Text © A.D. Vershinin, V.P. Mar’evich, V.M. Chumarev, E.N. Selivanov, 2007, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2007, Vol. 52, No. 9,
pp. 1557−1561.
PHYSICOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
OF INORGANIC SYSTEMS
Effect of Tantalum on Phase Formation in the Fe–S System
A. D. Vershinin, V. P. Mar’evich, V. M. Chumarev, and E. N. Selivanov
Institute of Metallurgy, Ural Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Received August 17, 2006
Abstract—Phase formation in the Fe1 – x–Tax–S system with 0 < x < 0.5 has been studied at temperatures up
to 1273 K using X-ray diffraction. When the constituent elements are heated to 823 K, troilite (Tr), pyrrhotites
(PoI, PoII, and Pom), and pyrite (FeS2) are formed. Tantalum at these temperatures only insignificantly dissolves
in iron sulfides. In the range 823–1273 K, tantalum reacts with pyrrhotites PoII and Pom and pyrite to yield PoI,
FeTa3S6, and α-Fe. The solubility limit of tantalum in PoI is near Fe0.98Ta0.02S. The initiation temperature of
the reaction between troilite and tantalum producing FeTa3S6 and α-Fe is 873 K. The unit cell parameters of
tantalum change at 500 K, presumably due to the dissolution of iron and possibly sulfur (iron sulfide).
DOI: 10.1134/S0036023607090252
Phase formation in the Fe–Ta–S system is interest-
ing to both scientists and engineers [1, 2] for elucidat-
ing how refractory elements affect pyrrhotite polymor-
phism and tantalum partition. According to work [1],
tantalum withstands the attack of sulfur until 973 K;
therefore, pyrrhotites Fe1 − xS are the most likely initial
products formed by mixtures of iron, tantalum, and sul-
fur on heating. According to work [2], the ampoule syn-
thesis of tantalum sulfides is possible at 873 K.
The closeness of the Ä and ë parameters of the PoI
and PoII phases [3] implies that they belong to the same
solid solution, whose region at 273 K on one side bor-
ders the Tr + PoI two-phase region (stoichiometric iron
monosulfide or Tr plus PoI), and on the other side, the
PoII + Pom region (PoII plus Pom). Troilite FeS and
monoclinic pyrrhotite Fe7S8 are commonly treated as
stoichiometric compounds that exist within narrow ranges
of composition. The Fe7S8 stability range at 293 K is
46.6–46.9 at % Fe (0.12 ≤ x ≤ 0.13) according to work
[10]. According to works [11, 12], the extent of the
Fe7S8 stability region is at most 0.01 at % Fe (∆ı =
0.005); the stability temperature is at least 543 K [12].
In natural assemblages [3], hexagonal PoI is coherently
associated with troilite and PoII is associated with mono-
clinic pyrrhotite.
The stability of pyrrhotites, variations of the solubi-
lity limits of metals in them, and the decay of solid
solutions upon cooling were discussed in works [3–8].
According to the works cited, phase equilibria between
pyrrhotites and refractory metals, such as platinum,
rhodium, and palladium, are significantly affected by
the composition and temperature [4–8], and minor ele-
ments effect the properties of pyrrhotites, in particular,
the paramagnetic-to-ferrimagnetic transition [3].
In this work, our goals were to explore how tantalum
influences phase formation in the Fe–S system and to
quantify the compositions of the phases formed upon
the synthesis of sulfides of the Fe–Ta–S system.
Iron monosulfide Fe1 − xS as an individual phase
exists with 0 ≤ ı ≤ 0.125 (from FeS to Fe7S8). It crystal-
lizes in three NiAs-type phases. When the vacancy con-
centration is ı = 0–0.06, a superstructure is formed,
which differs from the base structure in that it has a
symmetry center as a result of the displacements of iron
and sulfur atoms from the positions normal for
NiAs-type structures (PoI, the Bertaux structure,
EXPERIMENTAL
A DRON-2.0 diffractometer (ëÓäα radiation,
graphite monochromator in the reflected beam) was
used in the experiments. Semiconductor grade germa-
nium was used as the internal standard [9]. The unit cell
parameters of iron sulfides were determined by least-
squares fits using five to nine reflections. The error in
the unit cell parameters was 0.0002 nm for the para-
meter A and 0.0004 nm for the parameter C. FeTa3S6
was in addition monitored by scanning (h00), (hh0),
and (00l) reflections with 0.01° steps and the accumu-
lation time equal to 300 s. The error in the parameters
in this case was 0.0001 nm. The density ρ of single-
‡ = Ä 3 , Ò = 2ë, where Ä and ë are the parameters of
the base structure). Another phase (iron monosulfide,
PoII) exists with 0.06 ≤ ı ≥ 0.10. The third iron sulfide
phase (Pom) is a vacancy superstructure in the iron sub-
lattice [3, 9] with a monoclinic distortion (β = 90.4°).
The concentration range of the third phase is 0.1 < x ≤
0.125 [9].
1459