3778
H. Nakajima et al. / Electrochimica Acta 51 (2006) 3776–3780
trode in the melt without MoCl3 is shown for comparison. These
CVs were recorded after several cycles. In both the plots, a
cathodic current shoulder is observed at around 0.03 V as well
as an anodic current peak at around 0.12 V. They are attributed
to the formation and dissolution of Ni–Zn alloy, respectively
[14]. Cathodic and anodic currents around 0 V in both the
plots are attributed to the deposition and dissolution of metallic
zinc, respectively. In the ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–MoCl3 melt, a new
cathodic wave, C1, is also observed in the potential range of
0.04–0.42 V, suggesting the electrodeposition of molybdenum.
The formations of Zn–Mo and/or Ni–Mo alloys are also taken
account from the phase diagrams [16].
3.1.2. Potentiostatic electrolysis and characterization of the
deposit
Since electrodeposition of molybdenum was suggested to
occur in the potential region of lower than 0.42 V, potentiostatic
electrolysis was performed at 0.15 V for 3 h, where deposition of
molybdenum was expected whereas that of metallic zinc or the
formation of Ni–Zn alloy was not. After the potentiostatic elec-
trolysis, a black film was deposited. However, only a small area
of the substrate was covered due to bad adhesion. Fig. 3 shows a
spectrum of XPS of Mo 3d for the film. Mo 3d3/2 and Mo 3d5/2
peaks corresponding to metallic molybdenum are observed at
231 and 228 eV, respectively [17]. The film is, thus, identified
as metallic molybdenum. It is also confirmed that the Zn–Mo
and/or Ni–Mo alloys are not formed. EDX results showed that
chloride content in the film was lower than 2 at.%, indicating that
the melt inclusion is not significant. On the other hand, an XRD
pattern did not show any distinctive peaks corresponding to a
metallic molybdenum crystal [18]. This is likely to be caused by
the too small thickness and/or low crystallinity of the film.
Fig. 4 shows a surfaceSEMimageofthefilm, wherespherical
particles and microcracks are observed. The spherical particles
are observed as light gray because the oxidation by rinsing with
the water may have proceeded larger extent compared with the
Fig. 4. A surface SEM image of a deposit obtained after potentiostatic electrol-
ysis at 0.15 V vs. Zn(II)/Zn for 3 h in ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–MoCl3 (0.05 mol kg−1
added) melt at 250 ◦C.
flat part. The microcracks indicate that tensile stress is gener-
ated on the deposited film. There are two possibilities for the
tensile stress. One is the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)
mismatching and the other is the deposition-induced internal
stress. The CTE mismatching is excluded since CTE of nickel is
larger than that of molybdenum, which gives rise to compressive
stress. Thus, the microcracks would be produced by the deposi-
tion induced tensile stress. The observation of the flakes of the
film showed that it was dense but had a thickness lower than
0.5 m. The metallic molybdenum is also obtained at 0.40 V,
which was confirmed by XPS analysis. Hence, it is confirmed
that cathodic currents at potentials lower than 0.42 V result from
the electrodeposition of molybdenum.
3.2. Electrodeposition of metallic molybdenum in
ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–MoCl3–KF melt
3.2.1. Cyclic voltammetry
The melts containing KF were examined since fine molyb-
denum deposits have been obtained in fluoride melts at
high temperatures [9,10]. Fig. 5 shows a cyclic voltammo-
gram at a nickel electrode in ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–KF(4 mol%
added)–MoCl3(0.05 mol kg−1 added) melt at 250 ◦C. A curve
for the melt added only KF to the blank melt is also shown
for comparison. They were recorded after several cycles. Addi-
tion of KF to the blank melt causes no distinctive change
in the potential region examined in the present study. In the
ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–KF–MoCl3 melt, a cathodic wave, C2, is
observed in the potential region of 0.04–0.45 V. This current
is possibly due to the electrodeposition of metallic molybde-
num, which is approximately three times larger than those in
the melt without KF. The shape change in the cyclic voltamme-
try in the potential region of 0–0.03 V shows the suppression
of both the deposition of metallic zinc and the formation of the
Ni–Zn alloy, which coincides with the relatively large amount
of molybdenum deposition at the electrode. In these potential
Fig. 3. An Mo 3d XPS spectrum of a deposit obtained after potentio-
static electrolysis at 0.15 V vs. Zn(II)/Zn for 3 h in ZnCl2–NaCl–KCl–MoCl3
(0.05 mol kg−1 added) melt at 250 ◦C. Argon ion etching time: 5000 s.