NiO STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION, II
21
tact with the ‘‘parent’’ NiO particle followed by the forma- of Ni3C was restarted immediately under the reaction con-
ditions. In the presence of the metal, the rate of CH4
increased in the beginning of the run, as compared to the
rate of CO2 (Fig. 5). However, when Ni3C appeared, the
ratio between the rates of CO2 and CH4 formation was
found to be as before.
Thus, there is some evidence that CO activation may
take place on the surfaces of the oxide, carbide, and metal,
as well as on carbon inclusions. The carbon inclusions seem
to be used for Ni3C and CO2 formation. Therefore, the
interface between Ni3C and NiO was highly profitable
for CO2.
The surface of the metal, especially (100) Ni, or the Ni
clusters located on the surfaces of oxide or carbide phases
seem to be suitable for H2 activation. According to the data
obtained for Sample II, the CO2 formation was competitive
with the CO hydrogenation when the centers for the H2
activation were deficient. The catalyst with a high content
of the metal, especially (100) Ni, was better suited for
the methane formation. In none of the special prolonged
experiments with the fine nickel powder as a catalyst (aver-
age size of the particles of 35 nm) (20), the deposition of
coke or Ni3C was observed. This phenomenon is associated
with the high concentration of H atoms on the surface and
in the bulk of the catalyst. The concentration could be
enough for the hydrogenation of different forms of CO
adsorbed hindering the carbon and Ni3C production.
tion of the new Ni3C microcrystals.
In spite of the simplicity of the structural transformation
of NiO(II), the process began at a higher temperature and
after a longer induction period as compared to Sample I.
This seems to be associated with two factors: (i) the diffi-
culties in removing oxygen from the (111) plane of NiO
and (ii) the accumulation of the definite amount of Cintrinsic
in the subsurface layer of the oxide microcrystal.
According to TEM results (11), concentration of point
defects in this sample is low; therefore activation of H2
and CO takes place only on the surface steps of the NiO(II)
microcrystals. The concentration of such centers does not
seem to be high. Thus, the removal of oxygen from the
surface of oxide, as well as the accumulation of carbon, is a
slow process. The most likely speculation about the catalyst
state is that the partially reduced surface of the (111) plane
of NiO is promoted with carbon. According to (15, 16),
the rate of dissociative adsorption of H2 on this kind of
surface is low, as compared to that of Sample I. However,
the carbon clusters with a negative charge may be consid-
ered the additional centers of CO adsorption (17).
Under non-steady-state conditions, the major portion of
CO2 was produced by reactions [4] and [7]. It seems that
Ni3C, part of CO2, and CH4 were formed from Cintrinsic
as follows:
,
SUMMARY
Ni3C
Ni
The initial microstructure and morphology of the poly-
crystalline NiO precursor define the phase composition
and the catalytic properties of the multiphase catalysts
obtained for the CO hydrogenation. Under the treatment
in the reaction mixture, the precursor with the (100) most
developed plane was transformed into the Ni/Ni3C/NiO
catalyst containing the cubic microcrystals of NiO covered
by the layer of (100)Ni and polycrystalline Ni3C. The major
product of reaction was found to be CH4. Under similar
conditions, the precursor with the (111) most developed
plane was transformed into the Ni3C/NiO catalyst involv-
ing the NiO platelets covered by ‘‘monocrystals’’ of Ni3C
and separate particles of Ni3C. On this catalyst, CH4 and
CO2 were formed to the same extent. The catalytic proper-
ties were found to be interrelated with the phase composi-
tion of the sample, as well as with the morphology of each
of the phases.
Cintrinsic
H2O
H2
CH4
CH4 + CO2
(18, 19)
As for the water–gas shift reaction, as a contributor of
CO2, the Ni-containing catalyst does not seem to be good
for it.
We recall that both the rates of CO2 and CH4 formation
increased, as the content of Ni3C increased. Under the
non-steady-state conditions, the rate of CO2 exceeded the
rate of CH4. Under steady-state conditions, these rates
were found to be almost equal. The CH4 formation took
place with the formal stoichiometry, as follows:
2CO ϩ 2H2 Ǟ CH4 ϩ CO2.
[8]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
When the Ni3C/NiO catalyst was transformed into the
Ni/NiO catalyst, the polycrystalline metal did not form a
continuous layer on the surface of NiO(II) due to the
absence of the structural similarity between the (111) plane
of NiO and the cubic unit cell of Ni. Thus, the surface of
oxide was still accessible for the reagents, and formation
The authors are thankful to Prof. A.Ya. Rozovskii (Moscow Institute
of Petrochemical Synthesis) for valuable comments and discussion.
REFERENCES
1. Reymond, J. P., Meriandeau, P., and Teichner, S. J., J. Catal. 75,
39 (1982).