ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Mourdikoudis et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 321 (2009) 3120–3125
3125
employment of amines as high-boiling-point solvents, surfactants
and reducing agents simultaneously, facilitated the production of
CoxPt1ꢀx nanostructures with sufficient yield in Co–Pt alloy in the
majority of the samples. The highly bulky trioctylamine resulted
mainly in spherical particles, while oleylamine induced one-
dimensional growth and favored the formation of ‘in-situ’ self-
assembled flower-like nanostructures or nanowires. Additional
surfactants such as ACA and TOPO assisted also the control of the
morphology of the particles, by influencing their shape and
improving the degree of separation among each other. Depending
on the composition of the samples, annealing at 700 1C in inert gas
was proved to provoke the transformation to more ‘ordered’
phases (fct-CoPt), with ‘harder’ magnetic response, as shown
by a remarkable increase in coercivity values, even at room
temperature.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 7. Room-temperature M–H plots for sample S5 with and without annealing
treatment.
This work was funded by the General Secretariat for Research &
Technology of Greece (Code: PENED03667) and the European
Union Marie-Curie RTN ‘Syntorbmag’(Contract no.: MRTN-CT-
2004-0055667).
coercivity (o100 Oe in all temperatures), could be attributed
to a slight ferromagnetic contribution due to the existence of a
minority of equiatomic CoPt particles, as the superparamagnetic
limit of the CoPt-phase is at ꢂ2.8 nm. In any case, it has to be
noted that in general, the size decrease in CoxPt1ꢀx nanoparticles
is associated with a deterioration of the overall magnetic behavior
of the material. As an example, Shevchenko et al. recorded
the reduction of Ms and Hc values in CoPt3 nanoparticles, by
decreasing their size from 9.4 to 6.6 and further to 3.8 nm [21].
Further details concerning the magnetic behavior of such small
and larger spherical CoxPt1ꢀx particles can be found in our
previous relevant work [24].
References
[1] R.A. McCurrie, P. Gaunt, Philos. Mag. 13 (1966) 567.
[2] F. Bolzoni, F. Leccabue, R. Panizzieri, L. Pareti, IEEE Trans. Magn. 20 (1984)
1625.
[3] K. Simeonidis, S. Mourdikoudis, I. Tsiaoussis, C. Dendrinou-Samara,
M. Angelakeris, O. Kalogirou, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (2008) 2665.
[4] E.V. Shevchenko, D.V. Talapin, A.L. Rogach, A. Kornowksi, M. Haase, H. Weller,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 11480.
[5] S. Kang, Z. Jia, D.E. Nikles, J.W. Harrell, J. Appl. Phys. 95 (2004) 6744.
[6] C.N. Chinnasamy, B. Jeyadevan, K. Shinoda, K. Tohji, J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003)
7583.
Finally, the magnetic features of sample S5 are revealed in
Fig. 7. The high Ms value (ꢂ50 emu/g) can be attributed to the large
size of S5 particles (ꢂ18 nm) as well as to the high percentage
of cobalt in this individual CoxPt1ꢀx sample. Nevertheless, the
annealing treatment did not lead to any significant change in the
magnetic parameters (e.g. coercivity). The Co-rich character
of the formed alloy averted the transformation to any ‘ordered’
structure, which could possess the typical ‘hard’ magnetic
properties. In general, the coercivity and magnetization values
for our samples are comparable to the literature ones for systems
with similar compositions and morphologies. However, in most
cases the saturation magnetization was lower than the Ms value
of the equiatomic CoPt ‘bulk’ alloy (44 emu/g, using bulk
density ¼ 8.12 emu/cc for the calculation) [25]. The relatively
high Ms values for samples S3 and S5 (ꢂ40 and ꢂ50 emu/g
respectively at room temperature) can be mainly assigned to the
high percentage of cobalt in these samples, even if Co is
incorporated in a Co-rich alloy, e.g. Co3Pt.
[7] T.B. Massalski, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM International, Ohio, 1996.
[8] K. Elkins, D. Li, N. Poudyal, V. Nandwana, Z. Jin, K. Chen, J. Ping Liu, J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys. 38 (2005) 2306.
[9] S. Kang, Z. Jia, S. Shi, D.E. Nikles, J.W. Harrell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005)
062503.
[10] Y. Wang, H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 5316.
[11] Z. Zhang, D.A. Blom, Z. Gai, J.R. Thompson, J. Shen, S. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125
(2003) 7528.
[12] V. Tzitzios, D. Niarchos, M. Gjoka, N. Boukos, D. Petridis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127
(2005) 13756.
[13] Y. Vasquez, A.K. Sra, R.E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 12504.
[14] N. Shukla, M.M. Nigra, T. Nuhfer, M.A. Bartel, A.J. Gellman, Nanotechnology 20
(2009) 065602.
[15] C. Wang, Y. Hou, J. Kim, S. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 6333.
[16] L. Zhang, Y.H. Dou, H.C. Gu, J. Cryst. Growth 296 (2006) 221.
[17] X. Zhong, Y. Feng, I. Lieberwirth, W. Knoll, Chem. Mater. 18 (2006) 2468.
[18] K. Ahrenstorf, O. Albrecht, H. Heller, A. Kornowski, D. Gorlitz, H. Weller, Small
3 (2007) 271.
[19] Y.H. Kim, Y.W. Jun, B.H. Jun, S.M. Lee, J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002)
13656.
[20] X. Du, M. Inokuchi, N. Toshima, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 299 (2006) 21.
[21] E.V. Shevchenko, D.V. Talapin, H. Schnablegger, A. Kornowski, O. Festin,
P. Svedlindh, M. Haase, H. Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 9090.
[22] H.L. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, Q. Zeng, G.C. Hadjipanayis, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 272–276 (2004) e1279.
[23] L. Castaldi, K. Giannakopoulos, A. Travlos, D. Niarchos, S. Boukari,
E. Beaurepaire, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 290–291 (2005) 544.
[24] S. Mourdikoudis, K. Simeonidis, K. Gloystein, M. Angelakeris, C. Dendrinou-
Samara, F. Tuna, O. Kalogirou, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. accepted for publication.
[25] T. Seto, K. Koga, H. Akinaga, F. Takano, T. Orii, M. Hirasawa, J. Nanopart. Res. 8
(2006) 371.
4. Conclusions
The current work was focused on the tailoring of the
morphology of CoxPt1ꢀx nanostructures, which had also variable
compositions, depending on the synthetic parameters. The