2
662
X. Tao et al. / Polyhedron 30 (2011) 2661–2666
on a Perkin–Elmer 240 C elemental analyzer. Thermogravimetric
studies (TG) and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) studies
were carried out with a NETZSCH STA 409 PC/PG with a constant
(s), 1203 (s), 1073 (m), 1007 (vs), 788 (vs), 754 (vs), 634 (m), 579
(s), 521 (vs), 461 (m).
ꢁ1
3
ꢁ1
heating rate of 10 °C min
under N
2
(30 cm min ). Melting
2.2.4. Synthesis of {CH (SO ) Ag ꢀ[P(OMe) ] } (2c)
2
3 2
2
3 6
points were observed in sealed capillaries and are uncorrected.
The MOCVD experiments were carried out in a vertical quartz tube
hot-wall MOCVD reactor, 60 mm in diameter. Heating was
achieved by a resistively heated tube oven (AICHUANG Company).
The temperature was set by the temperature control FP 93 (SHI-
MADEN Company) and was calibrated with a thermocouple type
SR 3 (SHIMADEN Company) digital thermometer. The precursor
container was heated with a heating band for evaporation of the
precursor. The precursor vapor was transported to the reactor tube
Complex 2c was synthesized by following the same procedure,
only using [CH (SO ) Ag ] (0.3899, 1.00 mmol) with trim-
2
3 2
2
ethylphosphite (0.7446 g, 6.00 mmol). After appropriate work-up,
complex 2c was obtained as a colorless liquid. Yield: 1.04 g (92%,
based on [CH (SO ) Ag ]). Anal. Calc. for C19H56O24Ag P S : C,
2
3 2
2
2 6 2
1
20.12; H, 4.98. Found: C, 20.07; H, 4.89%. H NMR (CDCl ) d: 4.3
(s, 2H, CH –H), 3.7 (d, 54 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH –H). C{ H} NMR
3
1
3
1
2
PH
3
(CDCl ) d: 68.4 (CH ), 50.9 (J = 3.6 Hz, CH ). IR (KBr) data
3
2
PC
3
ꢁ1
(cm ): 2997 (m), 2953 (m), 2845 (m), 1460 (s), 1250 (s), 1202
(vs), 1069 (m), 1005 (vs), 788 (vs), 633 (m), 580 (vs), 520 (s), 459
(m), 414 (m).
2
by N carrier gas. The carrier gas flow was regulated using a D07-
7
B (SEVENSTAR Company) mass flow controller which was con-
nected to the apparatus by a section of flexible stainless steel tub-
ing. The pressure control system consisted of a cooling trap and a
FT-110 (KYKY Company) molecular pump unit. The trap prevents
the reactor effluents from entering the vacuum pump. The film
thickness was measured with an Ambios Technology XP-1 Profi-
lometer. The powder X-ray diffraction pattern was recorded on a
D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer. SEM images and EDX analysis
were carried out with an Hitachi Model S-4800 with scanning elec-
tron microscope and an energy dispersive X-ray detector.
2
.3. X-ray structure determination
Single crystals of 2a could be obtained by cooling a saturated
dichloromethane solution to 253 K. A suitable crystal for X-ray
determination was placed in glue under N due to its sensitivity
to oxygen and moisture. X-ray structure measurement was per-
formed on a BRUKER SMART Apex CCD detector equipped with
2
graphite monochromatic Mo K
a radiation (k = 0.71073 Å) at
1
53 K. Date collection and processing (cell refinement, data reduc-
2
.2. Synthesis
tion and empirical absorption correction) were performed using
the CRYSTALCLEAR program package [27]. The structure was solved
using direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares pro-
cedures on F (SHELX-97) [28]. All of the non-hydrogen atoms were
refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Crystallo-
graphic data and details on refinement are presented in Table 1.
2 3 2 2
2.2.1. Synthesis of [CH (SO ) Ag ] (1)
Methanedisulfonic acid (4.58 g, 0.026 mol) dissolved in 30 mL
of H O was added dropwise into a stirred suspended solution of
Ag CO ] (7.72 g, 0.028 mol) in 20 mL of H O at 20 °C. A clear solu-
2
2
[
2
3
2
tion was obtained by filtration through a pad of Celite after stirring
the reaction mixture for 1 h at 20 °C. A white solid product was ob-
tained after removing water in a rotary evaporator and drying in a
vacuum oven at 50 °C. The product was stored under nitrogen and
2
.4. Metal organic chemical vapor deposition of 2b
The deposition of silver was conducted using a vertical quartz
2 3
kept in a dark place. Yield: 8.52 g (84%, based on Ag CO ). It could
tube hot-wall MOCVD reactor with 2b as the precursor. As sub-
be also synthesized by reacting methanedisulfonic acid with Ag
2
O
2
–
1
in water [26]. M.p.: 306 °C dec. H NMR (D
2
O) d: 4.4 (s, 2 H, CH
H). IR (KBr) data (cm ): 3029 (w), 2978 (w), 1271 (m), 1229 (vs),
080 (w), 1023 (s), 814 (m), 772 (w), 589 (m), 537 (w), 516 (m).
Table 1
ꢁ1
Crystallographic data and analysis parameters for {CH
2
(SO
3
)
2
Ag
2
ꢀ[P(OMe)
3 2
] }.
1
Formula
7 2 12 2 2
C H20Ag O P S
Formula weight
Space group
Crystal size (mm)
Crystal system
Z value
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
638.03
P2(1)/c
2
.2.2. Synthesis of {CH
Trimethylphosphite (0.3723 g, 3.00 mmol) dissolved in 20 mL of
Cl was added dropwise into stirred solution of
(SO Ag ] (0.5848 g, 1.50 mmol) suspended in 20 mL of
Cl at 0 °C. A clear solution was obtained by filtration through
2
(SO
3
)
2
Ag
2
ꢀ[P(OMe)
3 2
] } (2a)
0.2 ꢂ 0.2 ꢂ 0.2
monoclinic
4
9.305(2)
10.178(2)
20.719(4)
90
98.52(3)
90
2.184
CH
2
2
a
[
CH
2
)
3 2
2
CH
2
2
a pad of Celite after stirring the reaction mixture for 6 h at 0 °C. A
white solid was obtained after removing all the volatiles in oil-
a
(°)
b (°)
pump vacuo, Yield: 0.90 g (94%, based on [CH
9 °C dec. Anal. Calc. for C : C, 13.18; H, 3.16. Found:
) d: 4.5 (s, 2 H, CH –H), 3.7 (d, 18
–H). 13C{ H} NMR (CDCl
) d: 68.1 (CH ), 51.8
). IR (KBr) data (cm ): 3029 (m), 2975 (m),
2 3 2 2
(SO ) Ag ]. M.p.:
c
D
(°)
6
7 20 2 2 2
H O12Ag P S
calc (g/cm3)
1
C, 13.13; H, 3.05%. H NMR (CDCl
3
2
Index ranges
ꢁ11 6 h 6 9, ꢁ11 6 k 6 12,
1
H, JPH = 13.7 Hz, CH
PC = 5.2 Hz, CH
3
3
2
ꢁ24 6 l 6 20
prism/colorless
1256
ꢁ1
(J
3
Crystal shape/color
F (0 0 0)
2
1
839 (m), 1461 (m), 1381 (m), 1273 (s), 1223 (vs), 1077 (m),
022 (vs), 812 (s), 761 (s), 636 (m), 589 (s), 535 (m), 517 (s).
ꢁ
l
(Mo K
a
) (mm 1
)
2.45
0.71073
153(2)
k (Mo K
a) (Å)
Temperature (K)
2
.2.3. Synthesis of {CH
Complex 2b was synthesized by following the same procedure,
only using [CH (SO Ag (0.5848 g, 1.50 mmol) and trim-
2
(SO
3
)
2
Ag
2
ꢀ[P(OMe)
3
]
4
} (2b)
h range (°)
3.0–28.8
2653
Independent reflections
(I) > 2 (I)]
[I > 2
wR [I > 2
[
r
a
2
3
)
2
2
]
R
1
r
(h)]
0.036
0.082
1.01
0.86
ꢁ0.71
ethylphosphite (0.7446 g, 6.00 mmol). After appropriate work-up,
complex 2b was obtained as a colorless liquid. Yield: 1.21 g (91
%
1
(h)]b
2
r
2
c
Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F
ꢁ
3
, based on [CH
7.62; H, 4.32. Found: C, 17.57; H, 4.24%. H NMR (CDCl
2
(SO
3
)
2
Ag
2
]). Anal. Calc. for C13
H
38
O
18Ag
2
P
4
S
2
: C,
D
D
q
max (e Å
)
qmin (e Åꢁ3)
1
3
) d: 4.4
–H). 13C{ H} NMR
1
(
(
(
s, 2 H, CH
CDCl ) d: 68.5 (CH
2
–H), 3.7 (d, 36 H, JPH = 12.9 Hz, CH
), 51.5 (JPC = 4.4 Hz, CH
cm ): 2999 (m), 2953 (s), 2845 (m), 1461 (s), 1386 (m), 1253
3
a
b
c
(w(F 2o ꢁ F ) )/
2
2
(wF )]1/2.
4
R
1
=
R
(||F
o
| ꢁ |F
c
||)/
R
|F
o
|; wR
2
= [
R
R
c
o
2
2
o
2
2
2
c
3
). IR (KBr) data
w = 1/[
r
(F
) + (0.0483P) ], P = (F
o
þ 2F
)/3.
3
1
2
2
2
2
1/2
ꢁ
S = [R
w(Fo ꢁ F ) ]/(n ꢁ p) , n = number of reflections, p = parameters used.
c