Antimony Nanowires
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 43, 2004 16725
driving force of nanoparticle self-organization. In the present
case, one possible function of PVP is to kinetically control the
growth rates of the different crystalline planes by interacting
with these planes through adsorption and desorption, which is
related to the “poisoning” mechanism,19-21 leading to a high
anisotropic growth. The presence of short nanorod and linear
nanostructures in Figure 4 indicates that the nanowires formed
not through point-initiated vectorial growth but rather by the
recrystallization of multiple nanoparticles in linear aggregate
that fused gradually into one crystal. Therefore, with the help
of the appropriate concentration of PVP and the strong metallic
bonding between the Sb nanoparticles, these nanoparticles
coalesced and aggregated orientationally to form linear nano-
structures in aging process22 and then recrystallized into
anisotropic crystal, i.e., nanowires in the following aging stage.
Conclusions
Figure 4. TEM image of intermediate state (by aging the starting
solution for 4 days) of Sb nanoparticle-nanowire transition. Nanorod
and nanorod-like structures of aggregated Sb nanoparticles are marked
by A and B arrows, respectively.
In conclusion, we reported in this paper a simple method to
prepare Sb nanowires. It has been found that the peak energy
of surface plasmon significantly shifts toward the lower energy
with the decrease in diameter of Sb nanowire. We believe that
the present method would be extended to synthesize Sb alloys
or other semimetal nanowires by choosing appropriate concen-
tration of PVP and aging duration.
EELS spectra collected from Sb nanowires with two different
diameters, nominally 300 and 20 nm, are shown in Figure 3b.
In this figure, the energy of the surface plasmon peak shifts
(from 10 to 7.5 eV) toward the lower energy, as the diameter
of Sb nanowires decreases. This red shift is similar to the result
of the theoretical calculation for the surface plasmon in metal
clusters due to the quantum size effect and the large ratio of
surface to volume.13 In metal nanowires, it is well-known that
the surface-to-volume ratio also becomes significant as the
nanowire diameters become very small. Therefore, when the
diameter of Sb nanowire changes from 300 to 20 nm, the peak
energy of surface plasmon shifts toward the lower energy.
To investigate the intermediate steps for transition from
nanoparticles to nanowires, the aliquots of the solution in the
early stages of the synthesis process (first 4 days) were examined
by TEM (Figure 4). It can be seen that a Sb nanorod (denoted
as A) has formed, and some Sb nanoparticles orientationally
aggregate along the short nanorod to form linear nanostructure.
In other parts of this figure, some nanoparticles also aggregate
orientationally and form linear nanostructures (denoted as B).
In the continued aging process, these linear nanostructures
recrystallize into nanowire crystals. Thus, the oriented aggrega-
tion of Sb nanoparticles seems to be the prerequisite leading to
crystalline fusion in our experimental conditions.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by KOSEF/
CRI and BK21.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Bachtold, A.; Hadley, P.; Nakanishi, T.; Dekker, C. Science
2001, 294, 1317. (b) Hong, B. H.; Bae, S. C.; Lee, C. W.; Jeong, S.; Kim,
K. S. Science 2001, 294, 348. (c) Hong, B. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Lee, C.-W.;
Kim, J. C.; Bae, S. C.; Kim, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10748. (d)
Ye, C. H.; Meng, G. W.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, G. Z.; Zhang, L. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15180.
(2) (a) Wang, Z. L. AdV. Mater. 2000, 12, 1295. (b) Suh, S. B.; Hong,
B. H.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Youn, S. J.; Jeong, S.; Kim, K. S. Phys. ReV. B
2003, 67, 241402(R). (c) Wang, Y. W.; Meng, G. W.; Zhang, L. D.; Liang,
C. H.; Zhang, J. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1773. (d) Nautiyal, T.; Rho, T.
H.; Kim K. S. Phys. ReV. B 2004, 69, 193404.
(3) (a) Huber, T. E.; Graf, M. J.; Foss, C. A., Jr.; Constant, P. J. Mater.
Res. 2000, 15, 1816. (b) Windmiller, L. R. Phys. ReV. 1996, 149, 472. (c)
Lin, Y. M.; Cronin, S. B.; Ying, J. T.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Heremans, J. P.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 3944. (d) Heremans, J. P.; Thrush, C. M.; Lin,
Y. M.; Cronin, S. B.; Zhang, Z.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Mansfield, J. M. Phys.
ReV. B 2000, 61, 2921.
(4) (a) Joseph, P. H.; Christopher, M. T.; Donald, T. M.; Wu, M. C.
Phys. ReV. Lett. 2002, 88, 216801-1. (b) Amy, L. P.; Marisol, M. G.;
Jennifer, K.; Ronald, G.; Timothy, S.; Angelica, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 2388.
The present experimental results provide strong evidence that
the oriented aggregation of Sb nanoparticles is a major reaction
path during the formation of single crystalline nanowires in the
described condition. However, it raises questions concerning
the exact growth mechanism, in particular, the exact role of
the poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) reagent. Recently, a few
studies reported how nanorods were prepared in a controllable
manner using evaporation or colloido-chemical methods.14-16
The formation of these nanorods requires anisotropic crystal
growth, which is usually realized when the growth rates of their
different crystallographic planes are significantly different. In
the wet chemical synthetic processes of CdSe and Co nanorods,
the growth rates of different crystal planes were controlled by
using two different surface ligands17 that probably bind selec-
tively to the respective surface planes. In addition, Tang et al.
reported that CdTe nanoparticles spontaneously reorganize into
single crystalline nanowires upon controlled removal of the
protective shell of organic stabilizer.18 It was believed that the
dipole-dipole interaction between the nanoparticles was the
(5) (a) Zhang, Y.; Li, G. H.; Wu, Y. C.; Zhang, B.; Song, W. H.; Zhang,
L. D. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 1227. (b) Barati, M.; Chow, J. C. L.; Ummat,
P. K.; Datars, W. R. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, 2955. (c)
Heremans, J. P.; Thrush, C. M.; Lin, Y. M.; Cronin, S. B.; Dresselhaus, M.
S. Phys. ReV. B 2001, 63, 85406.
(6) (a) Li, Y. D.; Wang, J. W.; Deng, Z. X.; Wu, Y. Y.; Sun, X. M.;
Yu, D. P.; Yang, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9904. (b) Gao, Y. H.;
Niu, H. L.; Zeng, C.; Chen, Q. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 367, 141-144.
(7) Cronin, S. B.; Lin, Y. M.; Rabin, O.; Black, M. R.; Ying, J. Y.;
Dresselhaus, M. S.; Gai, P. L.; Minet, J. P.; Issi, J. P. Nanotechnology 2002,
13, 653.
(8) (8) (a) Zhang, D. B.; Qi, L. M.; Yang, J. H.; Ma, J. M.; Cheng, H.
M.; Huang, L. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 872. (b) Wang, Y. L.; Herricks, T.;
Xia, Y. N. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1163.
(9) Egerton, R. F. Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in Electron
Microscopy, 2nd ed.; Plenum: New York, 1996.
(10) International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD), Nowtown Square,
PA, Powder Diffraction File, formerly JCPDS.
(11) Paliwal, V. K.; Vedeshwar, A. G.; Shivaprasas, S. M. Solid State
Commun. 2003, 123, 7.
(12) Reed, B. W.; Sarikaya, M. Phys. ReV. B 2001, 64, 195404.
(13) Ekardt, W. Phys. ReV. B 1985, 31, 6360.