218
S.C. Cho et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 429 (2006) 214–218
diameter) in center part of Fig. 4e was attached with two
adsorption, demonstrating that the TeO powder contains
2
small TeO spheres due to electron beam. The average par-
micropores. However, at the relative pressure P/P in the
2
0
ticle size measured from Fig. 4e was approximately
range of 0.82–1.0, there is a close hysteresis loop, which
can be observed in the pores with narrow necks and wider
bodies such as an ink-bottle, and can be associated with the
aggregates of particles.
1
08.2 nm consistent with the average particle size estimated
from the Williamson–Hall equation in Fig. 3b. Fig. 4f is a
magnified view of a rectangular box (d) in Fig. 4e, revealing
well-ordered layers of 0.167 nm thickness. In the synthesis
method by evaporation of metal in flame, metallic Te may
In summary, TeO nanoparticles have been synthesized
2
by directly heating Te granules in the O2 microwave-
plasma torch-flame at atmospheric pressure. The mean size
be located at the core of the TeO or form separate particle.
2
From energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum not shown
in this Letter, Te and oxygen species were detected with
atomic fraction of 66.6% oxygen and 33.4% tellurium con-
sistently. If the small amount of Te in Fig. 3a is ignored, we
expect that the as-produced sample is the oxide particle
close to 100%. Therefore, metallic Te is not incorporated
into the core of the oxide particle but exists as separate
particle.
of the synthesized TeO particles was 108.2 nm observed
2
from the TEM image and was 112.0 nm estimated by the
Williamson–Hall plot using XRD data. From the BET
measurements, the sample also showed the specific surface
2
area of about 5.75 m /g, porosity of 53.2%, pore volume of
3
0.011 cm /g, and pore size of 7.17 nm. Although the syn-
thesis approach by the microwave plasma torch in the
experiment is not finely controlled, this synthesis method
may be suitable for the direct continuous preparation and
In order to characterize the surface area and pore distri-
bution properties, the as-produced TeO2 nanoparticles
were analyzed by a nitrogen adsorption method. The as-
mass production of TeO nanoparticles.
2
produced sample had the specific surface area of about
Acknowledgements
2
5
.75 m /g at P/P = 0.2, porosity of 53.2%, pore volume
0
3
of 0.011 cm /g at P/P = 0.97, and pore size of 7.17 nm.
0
We acknowledge the financial support from the Nuclear
Fusion Research Center (NFRC) in Korea and BK 21 pro-
gram in part. TEM data were obtained from CCRF in
Sungkyunkwan University.
Fig. 5 shows the pore size distribution curve calculated
from the desorption branch of nitrogen isotherm by the
BJH method using the Halsey equation [17,20]. The TeO2
powders in Fig. 5 reveal tri-modal pore size distributions
consisting of mesopores (<20 nm), macropores (about
References
5
1 nm and about 80 nm). According to Kumer et al. [21],
mesopores and macropores are due to the finer intra-aggre-
gated and the larger intra-aggregated pores, respectively.
The inset also reveals the corresponding nitrogen adsorp-
tion–desorption isotherms of the sample. According to
the Brunauer–Deming–Deming–Teller (BDDT) classifica-
tion [18], the shape in the inset of Fig. 5 is a combination
of types I and IV of adsorption isotherms. At a very-low
[
[
1] S. Kitova, V. Rashkova, I. Konstantionv, Vacuum 69 (2003) 405.
2] A.C.M. Rodrigues, R. Keding, C. R u¨ ssel, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 273
(2000) 53.
3] V.S. Vassilev, Z.G. Ivanova, E.S. Dospeiska, S.V. Boycheva, J. Phys.
Chem. Solids 63 (2002) 815.
4] R.A.F. El-Mallaway, Tellurite Glasses Handbook: Properties and
Data, CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
5] G. Perrin, D. Coutris, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 49 (1988) 1397.
[
[
[
relative pressure (P/P < 0.1), the isotherm exhibits high
[6] F. Told, Glastech. Ber. 33 (1960) 303.
0
[
[
7] B. Jeansannetas et al., J. Solid State Chem. 146 (1999) 329.
8] A. Pierre, F. Duboudin, B. Tanguy, J. Portier, J. Non-Cryst. Solids
1
47 (1992) 569.
[9] S.N.B. Hodgson, L.J. Weng, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 276 (2000) 195.
[
[
10] K.M. Green, M.C. Borass, P.P. Woskov, G.J. Flores, K. Hadidi, P.
Thomas, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 29 (2001) 399.
11] W. Lai, H. Lai, S.P. Kuo, O. Tarasenko, K. Levon, Phys. Plasmas 12
(
2005) 023501.
[
[
12] Y.C. Hong, H.S. Uhm, Phys. Plasmas 12 (2005) 053504.
13] Y.C. Hong, C.U. Bang, D.H. Shin, H.S. Uhm, Chem. Phys. Lett. 413
(
2005) 454.
[
[
14] Y.C. Hong, H.S. Uhm, Chem. Phys. Lett. 422 (2006) 174.
15] D.H. Shin, Y.C. Hong, H.S. Uhm, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 (2005)
2
736.
16] Y.C. Hong, J.H. Kim, S.C. Cho, H.S. Uhm, Phys. Plasmas 13 (2006)
63506.
17] K.S.W. Sing, D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul, L. Moscou, R.A. Pierotti,
J. Rouquerol, T. Siemieniewska, Pure Appl. Chem. 57 (1985) 603.
18] P.A. Thomas, Solid State Phys. 21 (1988) 4611.
19] G.K. Williamson, W.H. Hall, Acta Metal. 1 (1953) 22.
20] A.W. Adamson, A.P. Gast, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997, p. 599.
[
[
0
[
[
[
Fig. 5. The pore size distribution curve and the corresponding nitrogen
isotherms (inset) of the as-produced samples.
[21] K.N.P. Kumer, J. Kumer, K. Keizer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (1994)
1396.