species are iodyl sulfate (IO2 HSO42),10 iodosyl sulfate
(IO+HSO42 10 and I(HSO4)311 as these are also reported to be
+
)
formed on oxidation of iodine in sulfuric acid.
To determine which of these species could be the active
catalyst we explicitly examined the stoichiometric reactions of
+
methane at 50 °C with independently synthesized samples of I2
[Sb2F11]2, IOHSO4, IO2HSO4 and I(HSO4)3 in oleum and SO2
solvents. Significantly, only the I2 [Sb2F11]2 shows stoichio-
+
metric reactions under these mild conditions. Thus, reaction of
+
15 ml of 100 mM I2 Sb2F112 (1.5 mmols) with excess methane
(30 mmols) at 50 °C for 1 h in 2.5 wt% oleum led to 30% yield
+
of methyl bisulfate based on the added I2 Sb2F112. Importantly,
no reaction is observed at these mild conditions if the
+
2
I2 Sb2F11 is replaced with 100 mmol of either elemental
iodine, IOHSO4, IO2HSO4 or I(HSO4)3. Repeating the reaction
with 100 mmols of I2 [Sb2F11]2 in 96% sulfuric acid also gave
+
no methyl bisulfate and is consistent with reported instability of
I2 species in SO3-free sulfuric acid solutions.9 We also
+
+
2
examined the reaction of SO2 solutions of I2 Sb2F11 with
methane at 35 °C as, unlike oleum, this solvent is not oxidizing
Fig. 1 Proposed electrophilic CH activation mechanism for the iodine
catalyzed oxidation of methane in oleum.
+
and is unlikely to oxidize the I2 to higher oxidation state
species. As was reported for the case of S82+,8 there is a clear
not catalyze H/D exchange between D2SO4/SO3 and CH4, no
methane is produced in this reaction. The proposed oxidation
step in Fig. 1 has been reported.9,11 Elemental sulfur, selenium
and tellurium are also reported to generate cationic species on
dissolution in oleum and we have found that these species also
catalyze reaction between methane and oleum, but at much
lower efficiencies as compared to iodine.
+
2
reaction with methane as the blue color of the I2 Sb2F11 is
bleached on exposure to 500 psig of methane after 10 h.
However, the reaction is not as clean as in oleum and NMR
analysis shows that several methyl products, among them
(CH3)2I+ and CH3F, are formed.
These observations are consistent with I2 (or I+) species as
+
the active catalyst but do not indicate whether free radical
mechanisms are involved. While the free radical reaction of
atomic iodine with methane can be discounted,12 free radical
Notes and references
1 P. Burger and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 10462; M.
W. Holtcamp, J. A. Labinger and J. E. Bercaw, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 848; L. Johansson, D. D. Wick and K. I. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1997, 119, 10235; O. B. Ryan and M. Tilset, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 1974; J. T. Golden, R. A. Andersenand and R. G. Bergman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 5837.
2 R. A. Periana, D. J. Taube, S. Gamble, H. Taube, T. Satoh and H. Fuji,
Science, 1998, 280, 560; R. A. Periana, D. J. Taube, E. R. Evitt, D. G.
Loffler, P. R. Wentrcek, G. Voss and T. Masuda, Science, 1993, 259,
340.
3 In a typical reaction, a 50 ml glass-lined, stirred, high-pressure reactor
containing 5 mM iodine and 2.5 wt% sulfur trioxide dissolved in 15 ml
of concentrated sulfuric acid was pressurized with methane to a final
pressure of 500 psig. This reaction mixture was vigorously stirred and
maintained at 195 °C for 2 h before analysis by NMR and HPLC. The
reaction must be properly mixed to avoid mass-diffusion control with
respect to CH4.
4 We did not examine oleum concentrations > 5 wt% SO3 as many
species are catalysts for the methane oxidation under those conditions.
A patent (N. J Bjerrum, C. Radhusvej, G. Xiao, L. Bauneporten, H. A.
Hjuler, R. K. Dreyervej, WO 99/24383) claiming the use of many
materials including iodine as catalysts for conversion of methane to
methyl bisufate in 65 wt% oleum was reported after we carried out our
initial work. No mechanistic work was reported on this patent.
5 A. Sen, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 550 and references therein.
6 G. A. Olah, G. K. S. Prakash and J. Sommer, Superacids, Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 1985.
+
reactions are plausible with the stronger oxidants I2 , IOHSO4,
IO2HSO4 or I(HSO4)3. However, given the high reaction yield
and selectivity as well as reproducible, first order kinetics with
respect to both methane and iodine, we are biased toward a non-
free radical pathway. This bias is strengthened by the observa-
tion that added oxygen gas or K2S2O8 (Table 1, #11) has no
affect on the reaction rate or selectivity. Oxygen and persulfate
are known radical scavengers and initiators, respectively, and
these species could be expected to lead to changes in rate or
selectivity. We also investigated elemental bromine and
chlorine as methane oxidation catalysts in 2–3% oleum. In both
of these cases, both the reaction rates and selectivities to methyl
bisulfate were lower (Table 1, # 9 and 10), than with iodine and
extensive poly-halogenated methanes typical of free-radical
reactions were observed. This marked difference in reactivity
between chlorine, bromine and iodine is consistent with the
proposed involvement of iodo cations such as I2+ as it has been
reported that the related cations of bromine and chlorine are not
stable in oleum.9
The unusually high reaction efficiency and product selectiv-
ity for methane conversion, along with the strong dependence
on solvent acidity is very similar to the reported, high yield
oxidation of methane in sulfuric acid solvent to methyl bisulfate
catalyzed by the soft, stable, redox-active electrophile, Hg(II).2
Based on the proposal that Hg(II) catalyzes methane oxidation
via CH activation by electrophilic substitution,2 it is possible
7 The formation of low levels of CH2DOSO3H is consistent with the
oxidation of the low levels of CH3D that is formed.
8 A. M. Rosan, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 7, 377.
9 R. J. Gillespie and M. J. Morton, Quart. Rev., 1971, 25, 553; T. A.
O’Donnel, Super Acid and Acidic Melts as Inorganic Chemical
Reaction Media, VCH Publishers Inc, New York, 1992, Chapter 4 and
references therein.
10 R. J. Gillespi and J. B. Senio, Inorg. Chem., 1964, 3, 972.
11 F. Aubke, H. A. Carter and S. P. Jones, Inorg. Chem., 1970, 9, 2485; A.
Bali and K. C. Malhotra, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1976, 38, 411.
12 The reaction of iodine radicals with methane is highly endothermic and
not a viable pathway for catalytic methane oxidation: D. M. Golden and
S. W. Benson, Chem. Rev., 1969, 69, 125.
13 Such reaction may involve inner-sphere proton-coupled electron
transfer: A. A. Fokin, T. E. Shubina, P. A. Gunchenko, S. D. Isaev, A.
G. Yurchenko and P. R. Schreiner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
10718.
14 P. J. Stang and V. V. Zhdankin, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 1123; V. A.
Grushin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2000, 29, 315.
+
that the poorly coordinated I2 H2S2O72, in spite of its known
radical character,9 is sufficiently electrophilic, soft and stable to
also react with methane by a predominantly electrophilic
substitution pathway as shown in Fig. 1, that does not involve
the formation of free radicals. The proposed electrophilic
+
substitution by I2 shown in Fig. 1, is not without precedent.
Similar electrophilic substitutions of CH bonds have been
proposed for the reaction of alkanes with H+, O3 , NO2 , and
other electrophiles.6,13 The electrophilic substitution of arenes
by aryl iodo cations is also known.14 Consistent with the
proposed functionalization step in Fig. 1 and the observation
that no free methyl iodide is formed, we find that addition of
methyl iodide to 2.5% oleum at 150 °C leads to the immediate
and quantitative formation of methyl bisulfate and blue colored
+
+
+
species due to I2 . Consistent with the observation that I2 does
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2376–2377
2377