598
Vol. 59, No. 5
Fig. 1. Structure of Polymyxin B, Polymyxin B Nonapeptide, and Synthetic Peptides ((1)—(10))
Fmoc-Thr(Bzl)-OH, Fmoc-D-Phe-OH, Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Ser(Bzl)-OH,
and Fmoc-Dap(2-ClZ)-OH. The Fmoc group was removed with 20% piperi-
dine in N-methylpyrolidone (NMP). As an example, the synthesis of [Ser2-
Dap3]-PMB(2—10) (2) and guanyl-[Dab1-Thr2-Dab3]-PMB(1—10) (5) are
described below.
similar to that described in (2).
Preparation of Guanyl-[Dab1-Thr2-Dab3]-PMB(1—10) (5) Guanyl-
[Dab1-Thr2-Dab3]-PMB(1—10) was synthesized essentially as described
above on Fmoc-Thr(Bzl)-O-HMP-resin (0.14 mmol, 100—200 mesh) using
appropriate Fmoc-derivatives. The desired protected peptide-resin, Fmoc-
Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Dab(Boc)-Dab(2-ClZ)-D-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-
ClZ)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-O-HMP-resin (785 mg) thus obtained was
treated with TFA (9.5 ml) in the presence of H2O (0.5 ml) at room tempera-
ture for 1 h to give Fmoc-Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Dab4-Dab(2-
ClZ)-d-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-ClZ)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-OH (271 mg), which was
then chromatographed on a Toyopearl HW-40-S column (1.6ꢁ95 cm) using
DMF : H2O (9 : 1). The obtained linear, partially protected peptide (221 mg,
0.095 mmol) was cyclized with DPPA (103 ml, 0.48 mmol) and NMM (97 ml,
0.95 mmol) in the same manner as described above to yield Fmoc-Dab(2-
ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-Dap(2-ClZ)-Dab4*-Dab(2-ClZ)-D-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-ClZ)-
Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)10* (*–*: amide bond between the a-COOH of Thr10
and the g-NH2 of Dab4) (173 mg). The Fmoc group of the protected cyclic
peptide was removed with 20% piperidine in DMF.
Preparation of [Ser2-Dap3]-PMB(2—10) (2) The peptide chain was
elongated on Fmoc-Thr(Bzl)-O-HMP-resin (0.25 mmol, 100—200 mesh)
and Fmoc-amino acid derivatives (1.0 mmol) were successively introduced
on the peptide chain using O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-
uronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU) (1.0 mmol) as the coupling reagent.
After construction of the desired sequence, the protected peptide-resin,
Fmoc-Ser(Bzl)-Dap(2-ClZ)-Dab(Boc)-Dab(2-ClZ)-D-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-ClZ)-
Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-O-HMP-resin (685 mg) was treated with trifluo-
roacetic acid (TFA) (9.5 ml) in the presence of H2O (0.5 ml) for 1 h at room
temperature, cleaving the peptide from the HMP-resin and removing the Ng-
Boc group from Dab4 to yield Fmoc-Ser(Bzl)-Dap(2-ClZ)-Dab4-Dab(2-
ClZ)-D-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-ClZ)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)-OH. The excess TFA
was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was lyophilized from dioxane. The
product (433 mg) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) and purified
by gel filtration on a column (1.6ꢁ95 cm) of Toyopearl HW-40-S using
DMF : H2O (9 : 1) as the eluent. Fractions containing the desired product
were combined, DMF was evaporated, and the peptide was dissolved in
dioxane and lyophilized. The linear, partially protected [Ser2-Dap3]-
PMB(2—10) (381 mg, 0.19 mmol) was dissolved in ice-cold DMF–di-
methylsulfoxide (DMSO) (1 : 1), and then diphenyl phosphorazidate (DPPA)
(161 ml, 0.75 mmol) and 4-methylmorpholine (NMM) (150 ml, 1.50 mmol)
were added. The mixture was reacted for 18 h at 4 °C to form the lactam
ring. The cyclized product Fmoc-Ser(Bzl)-Dap(2-ClZ)-Dab4*-Dab(2-ClZ)-
D-Phe-Leu-Dab(2-ClZ)-Dab(2-ClZ)-Thr(Bzl)10* (*–*: amide bond between
the a-COOH of Thr10 and the g-NH2 of Dab4) was purified on a Toyopearl
HW-40-S column (1.6ꢁ95 cm). Fractions containing the designed product
(362 mg) were combined, the solvent was evaporated, and the peptide was
re-solubilized in dioxane and lyophilized. The Fmoc group was removed
with 20% piperidine in DMF for 5 min at room temperature, the solvent was
evaporated, and the peptide was again re-solubilized in dioxane and
lyophilized. The obtained product was treated with anhydrous HF (5 ml) in
the presence of anisole (500 ml) for 1 h at 0 °C. After evaporation of the HF,
the residue was dissolved in H2O, washed with three portions of ether, then
lyophilized. The crude product (175 mg) was further purified by HPLC em-
ploying a Capcell Pak C18 UG-80 column (2ꢁ15 cm, Shiseido Co., Ltd.,
Tokyo, Japan) using an acetonitrile (CH3CN)–0.1% TFA solvent system.
The main product was collected, the fractions were combined, the solvent
was evaporated, and the product was re-solubilized in water and lyophilized.
The product (121 mg) was chromatographed on a Toyopearl HW-40-S col-
umn (1.5ꢁ57 cm) using 25% CH3CN in 5 mmol/l HCl to afford the final
preparation of compound (1) (108 mg, 0.11 mmol).
Guanylation of the cyclic partially protected peptide was performed in the
following manner.18) To a solution of the cyclic, partially protected peptide
(73 mg, 0.035 mmol) in DMF (1 ml), NMM (7.9 ml, 0.077 mmol), HgCl2
(10.5 mg, 0.039 mmol) and 1,3-bis(benzyloxycarbonyl)-2-methyl-2-thio-
pseudourea (13.8 mg, 0.039 mmol) were added at 0 °C. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 18 h at 4 °C, and then centrifuged. The supernatant was puri-
fied by gel filtration on a column (1.6ꢁ95 cm) of Toyopearl HW-40-S using
DMF as the eluent. Fractions containing the designed peptide were collected
and lyophilized. The resulting product (55 mg) was treated with anhydrous
HF (3 ml) containing anisole (0.3 ml) for 1 h at 0 °C. The crude peptide
(29 mg) thus obtained was purified by HPLC on a Capcell Pak C18 UG-80
column (2ꢁ15 cm) using a CH3CN–0.1% TFA solvent system. The product
(20 mg) was chromatographed on
(1.5ꢁ57 cm) using 25% CH3CN in 5 mM HCl to yield the desired compound
(5) (16 mg, 0.014 mmol).
The other guanyl PMB derivatives ((6)—(10)) were synthesized in a simi-
lar manner as described above. The purity of each synthetic peptide was
confirmed by analytical HPLC and FAB-MS analysis (Table 1).
Bacteria, and Antimicrobial Assay E. coli IFO 12734, S. Ty-
phimurium IFO 12529 and P. aeruginosa IFO 3080 were purchased from the
Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (IFO), Japan. These bacterial strains were
grown overnight at 37 °C on nutrient agar medium and harvested in sterile
saline. The densities of the bacterial suspensions were determined at 600 nm
using a standard curve relating absorbance to the number of colony-forming
units (CFU). The antibacterial activity of each synthetic peptide was evalu-
ated by comparing its activity with that of commercially available PMB
(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). The MIC of each synthetic
peptide against each of the bacterial strains was determined using a standard
microplate dilution method (nꢀ6—8). One hundred microliters of each pep-
a Toyopearl HW-40-S column
The other PMB derivatives ((1), (3) and (4)) were synthesized in a manner